Apical Support During Hysterectomy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse-NSQIP Analysis.
NCT ID: NCT03421067
Last Updated: 2019-03-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
3458 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2018-02-27
2019-02-14
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Apical Support During Hysterectomy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT03379246
Difference in Pain, Quality of Life Following Vaginal Hysterectomy With Vaginal Reconstruction Versus Robotic Colpopexy?
NCT02049996
Vaginal Vault Suspension During Benign Hysterectomy. A Questionnaire and Register-based Study.
NCT02859272
A Standardized Bundle Protocol to Optimize Outcomes With Patients Undergoing Gynecological Surgery
NCT03610425
Hysterectomy Versus Uterine Preservation for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery
NCT04890951
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Our understanding of pelvic anatomy and its support has been significantly improved over recent decades, with many researchers reporting on details and mechanics previously not understood.
In November 2017, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists released a new practice bulletin outlining the current standard of care for the treatment of women with pelvic organ prolapse. In this bulletin, they state that a hysterectomy alone is not adequate treatment for POP, and further that any woman having a hysterectomy for POP should undergo a concurrent apical suspension procedure as a standard of care.
The purpose of this study is to determine the proportion of patients undergoing hysterectomy for the indication of POP having concurrent apical suspension among the population whose cases are reported within the NSQIP database, and who underwent hysterectomy between 2015 and 2017.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Pelvic Organ Prolapse was not recorded in their postoperative diagnoses
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
TriHealth Inc.
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Catrina Crisp, MD, MSc
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
TriHealth - Cincinnati Urogynecology Associates
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
TriHealth - Cincinnati Urogynecology Associates
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
17-111
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.