Apical Support During Hysterectomy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT ID: NCT03379246
Last Updated: 2023-09-01
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
236 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2017-12-05
2018-08-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Apical Support During Hysterectomy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse-NSQIP Analysis.
NCT03421067
Same Day Discharge Following Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery
NCT04804826
Intraoperative Costs and Patient Perceptions in Sacrocolpopexy for Prolapse
NCT04179955
A Novel Laparoscopic Apical Promontofixation Technique With Simultaneous Perineal Reconstruction for Patients With Symptomatic Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT07271862
Difference in Pain, Quality of Life Following Vaginal Hysterectomy With Vaginal Reconstruction Versus Robotic Colpopexy?
NCT02049996
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In November 2017, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists released a new practice bulletin outlining the current standard of care for the treatment of women with pelvic organ prolapse. In this bulletin, they state that a hysterectomy alone is not adequate treatment for pelvic organ prolapse, and further that any woman having a hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse should undergo a concurrent apical suspension procedure as a standard of care.
The purpose of this study is to determine the proportion of patients already meeting the recently recommended best practice of supporting the vaginal apex at the time of hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse among the population who underwent the surgery performed at a TriHealth facility between October 2012 and October 2017.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Underwent hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse, performed at a TriHealth facility between October 2012 and October 2017
Exclusion Criteria
* Pelvic Organ Prolapse was not an indication for their surgery
* Surgery performed by a physician of Cincinnati Urogynecology Associates.
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
TriHealth Inc.
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Catrina Crisp, MD, MSc
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
TriHealth - Cincinnati Urogynecology Associates
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Cincinnati Urogynecology Associates
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hill AM, Pauls RN, Crisp CC. Practice Patterns Regarding Apical Support Procedures at Time of Hysterectomy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2020 Dec 1;26(12):774-778. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000716.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
17-091
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.