Resistance Training and Injection Treatment for Chronic Achilles Tendinopathy
NCT ID: NCT04210999
Last Updated: 2024-08-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
90 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-04-05
2026-03-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The primary purpose of the study is to compare treatment with supervised or homebased resistance training. The secondary purpose is to compare treatment with either corticosteroid or High Volume Injection (HVI) for those patients not responding to the primary treatment.
The tertiary purpose is to evaluate the effect of surgery in those patients not responding to the primary and the secondary treatment.
It is hypothesized that:
1. Homebased resistance training is as effective as supervised resistance training for treating chronic achilles tendinopathy
2. HVI injection is better than CS injection for those patients not responding sufficiently to treatment 1
3. Surgery improves symptoms in patients not responding to treatment 1 and treatment 2
Study 1: 90 patients between 18 and 65 years of age with achilles tendinopathy for at least 3 months are randomly assigned to either A. Resistance training at home instructed via a smart phone training app and avoidance of pain aggravating activities for 3 months B. Heavy slow resistance training in the gym instructed by a physiotherapist and avoidance of pain aggravating activities for 3 months
Outcomes are change in patient reported outcome (VISA-A) from baseline to 3 and 6 months, ultrasound measured thickness and dopler activity of the achilles tendon, self reported activity level in percentage of the pre injury activity level.
After the 3-month training intervention, and for the following 9 months, those patients that not are satisfied with the outcome will have the opportunity to participate in the second part of the study.
Study 2: Patients from study 1 which not are satisfied with the outcome are randomly assigned to either
A. Same training intervention continued + High Volume Injection (HVI) B. Same training intervention continued + corticosteroid injection
After the 4-month and for the following 8 months, those patients that not are satisfied with the outcome will have the opportunity to participate in the third part of the study.
Study 3: Patients from study 2 which not are satisfied with the outcome are operated
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Does Resistance Training Protocol Change Micromorphology in Achilles Tendinopathy?
NCT06009536
Isometric Contraction-Based Pain Modulation Versus Eccentric Strengthening in Treating Achilles Tendinopathy
NCT06905743
Effects of Low-load Resistance Training With Blood Flow Restriction in Patients With Achilles Tendinopathy
NCT05241197
Effect of Myofacial Release vs. Eccentric Resistance on Pain, ROM and Functional Disability on Achilles Tendonitis
NCT05550857
Effects of Resistance Training Preconditioning on Skeletal Muscle Recovery From a Period of Disuse in Young Adults
NCT05760066
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The primary purpose of the study is to compare treatment with supervised or homebased resistance training.
The secondary purpose is to compare treatment with either corticosteroid or High Volume Injection (HVI) for those patients not responding to the primary treatment.
The tertiary purpose is to evaluate the effect of surgery in those patients not responding to the primary and the secondary treatment.
It is hypothesized that:
4\. Homebased resistance training is as effective as supervised resistance training for treating chronic achilles tendinopathy (RCT, non-inferiority design).
5\. HVI injection is better than CS injection for those patients not responding sufficiently to treatment 1. (RCT, superiority design).
6\. Surgery improves symptoms in patients not responding to treatment 1. and treatment 2. (prospective cohort).
Study 1: 90 patients with achilles tendinopathy are randomly assigned to either
C. Resistance training at home instructed via a smart phone training app and avoidance of pain aggravating activities for 3 months D. Heavy slow resistance training in the gym instructed by a physiotherapist and avoidance of pain aggravating activities for 3 months
Inclusion criteria
* Pain from the achilles tendon either unilateral or bilateral for at least 3 months
* Achilles tendinopathy in the tendon midsubstance verified by ultrasound
* Between 18 and 65 years of age
* For patients with unilaterale symptoms the symptomatic tendon must be at least 20% thicker than on the asymptomatic side or more than 7 mm thick
* For patients with bilateral symptoms the achilles tendons must have diameters above 7 mm Exclusion criteria
* Prior surgery in the leg with the exception of knee arthroscopy
* Known medial conditions including diabetes or rheumatologic diseases
* Taking pain medication regularly
* Injection therapy for treatment of achilles tendinopathy within the last 6 months
Patients are stratified based on the severity of symptoms (below or above 50 on VISA-A) and duration of symptoms (shorter or longer than 1 year)
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Homebased resistance training
Resistance training at home instructed via a smart phone training app and avoidance of pain aggravating activities for 3 months
Homebased resistance training
Resistance training at home instructed via a smart phone training app
Supervised resistance training
Heavy slow resistance training in the gym instructed by a physiotherapist and avoidance of pain aggravating activities for 3 months
Supervised heavy slow resistance training
Heavy slow resistance training in the gym instructed by a physiotherapist
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Homebased resistance training
Resistance training at home instructed via a smart phone training app
Supervised heavy slow resistance training
Heavy slow resistance training in the gym instructed by a physiotherapist
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Achilles tendinopathy in the tendon midtsubstance verified by ultrasound
* Between 18 and 65 years of age
* For patients with unilaterale symptoms the symptomatic tendon must be at least 20% thicker than on the asymptomatic side or more than 7 mm thick
* For patients with bilateral symptoms the achilles tendons must have diameters above 7 mm
Exclusion Criteria
* Known medial conditions including diabetes or rheumatologic diseases
* Taking pain medication regularly
* Injection therapy for treatment of achilles tendinopati within the last 6 months
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Bispebjerg Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Simon Doessing, M.D., PhD
Senior Surgeon
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Michael Kjaer, MD. PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
University of Copenhagen and Bispebjerg Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Bispebjerg Hospital
Copenhagen, , Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
H-19040270
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.