Resistance Training and Injection Treatment for Chronic Achilles Tendinopathy

NCT ID: NCT04210999

Last Updated: 2024-08-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

90 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-04-05

Study Completion Date

2026-03-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Achilles tendinopathy is a common and often long-lasting injury among exercising individuals.

The primary purpose of the study is to compare treatment with supervised or homebased resistance training. The secondary purpose is to compare treatment with either corticosteroid or High Volume Injection (HVI) for those patients not responding to the primary treatment.

The tertiary purpose is to evaluate the effect of surgery in those patients not responding to the primary and the secondary treatment.

It is hypothesized that:

1. Homebased resistance training is as effective as supervised resistance training for treating chronic achilles tendinopathy
2. HVI injection is better than CS injection for those patients not responding sufficiently to treatment 1
3. Surgery improves symptoms in patients not responding to treatment 1 and treatment 2

Study 1: 90 patients between 18 and 65 years of age with achilles tendinopathy for at least 3 months are randomly assigned to either A. Resistance training at home instructed via a smart phone training app and avoidance of pain aggravating activities for 3 months B. Heavy slow resistance training in the gym instructed by a physiotherapist and avoidance of pain aggravating activities for 3 months

Outcomes are change in patient reported outcome (VISA-A) from baseline to 3 and 6 months, ultrasound measured thickness and dopler activity of the achilles tendon, self reported activity level in percentage of the pre injury activity level.

After the 3-month training intervention, and for the following 9 months, those patients that not are satisfied with the outcome will have the opportunity to participate in the second part of the study.

Study 2: Patients from study 1 which not are satisfied with the outcome are randomly assigned to either

A. Same training intervention continued + High Volume Injection (HVI) B. Same training intervention continued + corticosteroid injection

After the 4-month and for the following 8 months, those patients that not are satisfied with the outcome will have the opportunity to participate in the third part of the study.

Study 3: Patients from study 2 which not are satisfied with the outcome are operated

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Achilles tendinopathy is a common and often long-lasting injury among exercising individuals. Treatment options typically include rest from high load weight bearing activities, resistance training, injections with corticosteroid (CS) or High Volume Injection (HVI) and surgery.

The primary purpose of the study is to compare treatment with supervised or homebased resistance training.

The secondary purpose is to compare treatment with either corticosteroid or High Volume Injection (HVI) for those patients not responding to the primary treatment.

The tertiary purpose is to evaluate the effect of surgery in those patients not responding to the primary and the secondary treatment.

It is hypothesized that:

4\. Homebased resistance training is as effective as supervised resistance training for treating chronic achilles tendinopathy (RCT, non-inferiority design).

5\. HVI injection is better than CS injection for those patients not responding sufficiently to treatment 1. (RCT, superiority design).

6\. Surgery improves symptoms in patients not responding to treatment 1. and treatment 2. (prospective cohort).

Study 1: 90 patients with achilles tendinopathy are randomly assigned to either

C. Resistance training at home instructed via a smart phone training app and avoidance of pain aggravating activities for 3 months D. Heavy slow resistance training in the gym instructed by a physiotherapist and avoidance of pain aggravating activities for 3 months

Inclusion criteria

* Pain from the achilles tendon either unilateral or bilateral for at least 3 months
* Achilles tendinopathy in the tendon midsubstance verified by ultrasound
* Between 18 and 65 years of age
* For patients with unilaterale symptoms the symptomatic tendon must be at least 20% thicker than on the asymptomatic side or more than 7 mm thick
* For patients with bilateral symptoms the achilles tendons must have diameters above 7 mm Exclusion criteria
* Prior surgery in the leg with the exception of knee arthroscopy
* Known medial conditions including diabetes or rheumatologic diseases
* Taking pain medication regularly
* Injection therapy for treatment of achilles tendinopathy within the last 6 months

Patients are stratified based on the severity of symptoms (below or above 50 on VISA-A) and duration of symptoms (shorter or longer than 1 year)

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Achilles Tendinopathy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

RCT
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Homebased resistance training

Resistance training at home instructed via a smart phone training app and avoidance of pain aggravating activities for 3 months

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Homebased resistance training

Intervention Type OTHER

Resistance training at home instructed via a smart phone training app

Supervised resistance training

Heavy slow resistance training in the gym instructed by a physiotherapist and avoidance of pain aggravating activities for 3 months

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Supervised heavy slow resistance training

Intervention Type OTHER

Heavy slow resistance training in the gym instructed by a physiotherapist

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Homebased resistance training

Resistance training at home instructed via a smart phone training app

Intervention Type OTHER

Supervised heavy slow resistance training

Heavy slow resistance training in the gym instructed by a physiotherapist

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Pain from the achilles tendon either unilateral or bilateral for at least 3 months
* Achilles tendinopathy in the tendon midtsubstance verified by ultrasound
* Between 18 and 65 years of age
* For patients with unilaterale symptoms the symptomatic tendon must be at least 20% thicker than on the asymptomatic side or more than 7 mm thick
* For patients with bilateral symptoms the achilles tendons must have diameters above 7 mm

Exclusion Criteria

* Prior surgery in the leg with the exception of knee artroscopy
* Known medial conditions including diabetes or rheumatologic diseases
* Taking pain medication regularly
* Injection therapy for treatment of achilles tendinopati within the last 6 months
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Bispebjerg Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Simon Doessing, M.D., PhD

Senior Surgeon

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Michael Kjaer, MD. PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University of Copenhagen and Bispebjerg Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Bispebjerg Hospital

Copenhagen, , Denmark

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

H-19040270

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.