Community Outpatient Psychotherapy Engagement Service for Self-harm

NCT ID: NCT04191122

Last Updated: 2022-04-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-10-01

Study Completion Date

2022-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Background: Self-harm (SH) is any act of intentional self-injury or self-poisoning, with or without the intention to die. People who SH are at high risk for future suicide and often suffer considerable emotional distress. Depression is common among people who SH and may be an underlying driver of self-harm behaviour. Treating depression in people who SH has the potential to reduce the risk of further SH and suicide. Self-harm is often repeated, and risk of repetition is highest immediately after an act of self-harm. Readily accessible brief talking therapies show promise in helping people who SH, but further evaluation of these approaches is needed. The Community Outpatient Psychological Engagement Service for Self-Harm (COPESS) is a brief talking therapy intervention for depression and self-harm. This intervention was shown to be feasible and acceptable in hospital emergency department settings, but accessibility was limited; thus, the investigators wish to develop and test a community-based version of this intervention. The COPESS project moves this therapy into a community setting, thereby increasing the number of people who can be helped, especially those in hard-to-reach groups and from disadvantaged areas.

Aim: To assess the feasibility of conducting a trial of the COPESS intervention in a community setting, for people with depression who self-harm, in relation to participant recruitment and retention. Therapy, acceptability and safety of the intervention will also be assessed.

Methods: Using a Single Blind Randomised Control Trial (RCT) design, the investigators will recruit a sample of n=60 participants with a history of SH within the last six months, who are also currently depressed. Recruitment will take place via GP practices for patients who: 1) seek consultation for self-harm; 2) have consulted for self-harm in the previous 6 months (determined by GPs' search of their own data-systems); or 3) self-refer via their GP. Following baseline assessment participants will be randomly allocated to either receive COPESS plus Treatment as Usual \[TAU; n = 30)\] or TAU alone (n=30). Follow-up assessments will take place at one, two and three months. Recruitment rates, attrition and data completeness will be monitored. Qualitative interviews with participants and stakeholders will further investigate feasibility.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Design A mixed-method evaluation of a single-blind randomised controlled trial (RCT) will determine the acceptability and safety of the COPES intervention, in preparation for a future large-scale trial of the efficacy of COPES for depression in people who SH. People who have depression and SH in the community will be randomised to receive either COPES plus treatment-as-usual (TAU) or TAU alone.

Recruitment rates and power calculations This study is intended as a preliminary evaluation of the feasibility of conducting a future large-scale RCT of the COPES intervention. As, the investigators are not conducting any hypothesis testing of effectiveness, or estimation of prevalence (other than attrition) a formal power calculation is not appropriate. A recruitment target of n=60 (n=30 per trial arm) will be used. This is a common and realistic recruitment target for feasibility trials, and will allow adequate precision in estimating rates relevant to trial outcomes (e.g. attrition, adverse events). This will allow an overall attrition rate of 30% to be estimated with 95% confidence intervals of +/- 12% or, 16% for a single arm. This sample size is adequate for estimating relevant analysis parameters, such as the standard deviation of effects, which are needed for determining the feasibility of a later efficacy trial. To avoid high attrition rates, the investigators will keep participants engaged via text and/or telephone reminders. The previous pilot of HOPE within the ED achieved an average recruitment of nine eligible referrals each month. Sixty-one percent of participants engaged with the therapy and attended at least one session. Rates of attendance for SH at GP practices and walk-in centres in the Liverpool area have been estimated at 70 per month. Based on these figures a recruitment rate of 3 to 4 participants each month with a goal of n=60 participants overall is achievable.

Research Sites The research will take place in Liverpool, in the North West of England. The North West has particularly high rates of SH. Between April 2011 and March 2014, there were 16,405 presentations for deliberate SH to emergency departments within Merseyside and Cheshire. Liverpool local authority had one of the highest number of attendances for SH in this area (15%, n = 2,489). Therefore, Liverpool provides a good location for undertaking work on SH.

Recruitment of GP Practices Lead GPs and/or practice managers at practices identified as suitable for inclusion in the COPES study will be invited to take part in writing. Invitation packs will be given by GPs and followed up by a telephone/skype/face time/face-to-face contact from a member of the research team to ascertain level of interest, and if appropriate, to arrange a meeting to discuss the study in more detail. The Clinical Research Network (CRN) will assist with recruitment of GP practices and have provided a letter of support (see Appendix B). Clinicians will be briefed on the COPES trial and provided with guidance on referring patients in to the study. To assist recruitment, clinicians will be provided with a brief screening checklist to help identify patients where depression-linked SH may be a concern.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Self-Harm Depression

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

COPES is a brief (4 + 1 sessions, 50 minutes) psychotherapy based on psychodynamic and cognitive analytic principles that was developed to help those struggling with SH and depression. COPES is designed to be brief and accessible and involves working collaboratively with a client to try and identify patterns or conflicts in emotional experiences and interpersonal relationships, linked to depressed mood and acts of SH. The therapist works with the client to build a shared map or understanding of these experiences. A goal of therapy is to work towards a small number of specific "exits", representing helpful steps the client might make to improve their difficulties. Therapy would take place either in the participant's home or in a community setting (e.g. health centre or clinic) depending on preference.

Safety for the therapist and/or mobility for the patient will be reviewed throughout the recruitment period. Participants in the COPES arm of the trial will also receive TAU.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Caregivers
Participants will be randomized to receive COPES plus TAU or TAU via a random sequence generation computer algorithm within STATA to generate (stratified) randomised (block) allocations. Randomisation will be carried out by the study statistician using an independent computerised randomisation system with a randomly sized block design with block sizes of 2, 4 and 6. The study population will be stratified for those receiving TAU and those receiving COPES plus TAU. Researchers completing study assessments will be masked to treatment allocation, facilitated by briefing members of the research team and participants on the need to avoid disclosure of treatment details. The trial will follow an Intent-To-Treat (ITT) protocol. Attrition and reasons for drop-out will be recorded where possible. Guidance will be sought from the patient advisory group on how to manage and minimise attrition over the study period.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

COPESS and Treatment as usual

COPES is a brief (4 + 1 sessions, 50 minutes) psychotherapy based on psychodynamic and cognitive analytic principles that was developed to help those struggling with SH and depression. COPES is designed to be brief and accessible, and involves working collaboratively with a client to try and identify patterns or conflicts in emotional experiences and interpersonal relationships, linked to depressed mood and acts of SH. The therapist works with the client to build a shared map or understanding of these experiences. A goal of therapy is to work towards a small number of specific "exits", representing helpful steps the client might make to improve their difficulties. Therapy would take place either in the participant's home or in a community setting (e.g. health centre or clinic) depending on preference.

Safety for the therapist and/or mobility for the patient will be reviewed throughout the recruitment period. Participants in the COPES arm of the trial will also receive TAU.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

COPESS

Intervention Type OTHER

The intervention includes brief psychotherapy to be delivered within primary care settings

Treatment as usual only

The control group will receive Treatment-as usual (TAU), defined as the standard care provided to individuals struggling with self-harm (SH) as detailed within the 'Managing SH in primary care' NICE guidelines. These include: an initial comprehensive psychosocial assessment of skills and risks; co-production of a care and risk management care plan, which should include harm reduction plans, the need for between 3 and 12 sessions of psychological intervention as well as treatment for associated mental health conditions. Primary care practices in the control arm will be asked to provide information on what constitutes TAU within their organisation. This trial may enhance TAU as researchers will provide details of NICE guidance to GP practices that may not currently be following these guidelines. We will collect data regarding the acceptability of TAU for SH offered by GPs within both treatment arms.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

COPESS

The intervention includes brief psychotherapy to be delivered within primary care settings

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Community Outpatients Psychotherapy Engagement Service for Self-harm

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Recent episode of SH (in the past six months, self-reported)
* A score of 14 or greater on the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) corresponding to the BDI-II score where 14-19 = mild depression, 20-28 = moderate depression, \>28 = severe depression
* Aged 16 years and over (SH is especially prevalent in adolescents and young adults and often this transitional age is neglected. This study will be offering at least TAU which young people may not otherwise access. To leave 16-18 year olds out of this study may be unethical and guidance from the British Psychological Society states that people aged 16 years and over can give informed consent)
* Help-seeking, defined as attendance at GP practices or self-referral into the trial

Exclusion Criteria

* Non-English speaking
* Diagnosed with an intellectual disability as determined by review of clinical notes - the therapy has not yet been adapted for working with this population
* Experiencing severe problems with addiction to alcohol or illicit drugs
* Actively suicidal or psychotic and/or severely depressed and unresponsive to treatment as judged by clinical team
* Unable or unwilling to give written informed consent to participate in the study
* Currently receiving talking therapy for SH
Minimum Eligible Age

16 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Liverpool

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Manchester

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Leeds

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Liverpool John Moores University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Pooja Saini

Senior Lecturer

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Pooja Saini, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Liverpool John Moores University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Brownlow Medical Group

Liverpool, , United Kingdom

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Pooja Saini, PhD

Role: CONTACT

01512318121

Pauline Parker

Role: CONTACT

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Diane Exley

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Saini P, Hunt A, Clements C, Gabbay M, Mills C, Kvamme-Mitchell K, Tahir N, Mulholland H, Kullu C, Hann M, Duarte R, Murphy A, Guthrie E, Taylor P. Feasibility and acceptability of the Community Outpatient Psychotherapy Engagement Service for Self-harm (COPESS): randomised controlled trial. BJPsych Open. 2025 Aug 20;11(5):e190. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2025.10780.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40831028 (View on PubMed)

Saini P, Hunt A, Taylor P, Mills C, Clements C, Mulholland H, Kullu C, Hann M, Duarte R, Mattocks F, Guthrie E, Gabbay M. Community Outpatient Psychotherapy Engagement Service for Self-harm (COPESS): a feasibility trial protocol. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2021 Aug 27;7(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s40814-021-00902-3.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34452642 (View on PubMed)

Witt KG, Hetrick SE, Rajaram G, Hazell P, Taylor Salisbury TL, Townsend E, Hawton K. Psychosocial interventions for self-harm in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 22;4(4):CD013668. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013668.pub2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33884617 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NIHR200543

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.