RCT of the Clinical and Cost Effectiveness of Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT) Delivered Remotely Versus Treatment as Usual in Adolescents and Young Adults With Depression Who Repeatedly Self-harm

NCT ID: NCT02377011

Last Updated: 2018-01-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

22 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-01-31

Study Completion Date

2016-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A randomized controlled trial to test the whether remote delivery of cognitive based therapy (CBT) is clinically and cost effective when compared to treatment as usual in adolescents and young adults with depression who self-harm.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Self harm is one of the five leading causes of admission to acute hospital with rates increasing by nearly 50% from 2003-2009 (South West Public Health Observatory, 2012). Re-admission within 30 days is frequent. People who repeatedly self harm are at high risk for suicide and and as a result suicide, self-harm and crisis are priorities for CCGs and HWBs in the East Midlands.

The NICE Clinical Guideline 133 on longer-term treatment of self-harm recommends between 3 to 12 sessions of psychological treatment involving problem solving and alternative coping. Presently however, the biggest at risk group for self-harm and suicide is not offered any psychological treatment.

Studies have shown that mobile phones are a highly acceptable method of engaging adolescents with depression in psychological treatments such as CBT (Whittaker et al 2012). Furthermore a systematic review has show that treatment delivery via remote technology is just as effective as face-to-face in people with anxiety or depression (Bee et al, 2008).

The study therefore has the following aims and objectives:

1. To optimise and determine the acceptability and feasibility of engaging and retaining patients with depression who repeatedly self-harm in a remotely delivered (through video calling/telephone) CBT intervention over 10 sessions.
2. To outline the barriers and drivers to delivering both the study and the remotely delivered PS CBT intervention and how barriers to the interventions are addressed through a network of practice or other means.
3. If the recruitment and retention into the study and the remotely delivered PS therapy are feasible and acceptable, then we will determine the clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness of the intervention versus treatment as usual.
4. If the intervention (pilot study) proves to be clinically effective and cost effective then the barriers and drivers to implementation in all counties in the East Midlands will be explored using a network of practice linking with NHS organisations, strategic clinical networks, and the AHSN (see qualitative analysis of barriers and drivers to the implementation of the intervention below).

The main hypothesis of this study is:

Adolescents and young adults who receive problem solving cognitive behaviour therapy (plus treatment as usual) will report greater reduction in their depressive symptoms (as measured using Beck depression inventory 2) from baseline to 6 months in comparison to those receiving treatment as usual.

Secondary objectives will be to observe a change over 12 months on measures of depression, hopelessness and suicidality.

Study configuration:

This study will compare two groups: participants will be randomly assigned to the TAU group (control group) or the remotely delivered PS CBT (and TAU) group (intervention group).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Depression and Self-Harm

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

PS CBT

Problem solving cognitive behaviour therapy (PS CBT) will be delivered remotely by means of telephone or video calling by a cognitive behaviour therapist in addition to their usual care.

The duration of the intervention will be 10 sessions. Research measures will be completed at baseline, 3,6,9 and 12 months

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Problem solving cognitive behaviour therapy (PS CBT)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Treatment as Usual

Participants will not receive any CBT therapy in addition to their usual care. Research measures will be completed at baseline,3,6,9 and 12 months.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Problem solving cognitive behaviour therapy (PS CBT)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* \>2 self-harm episodes.
* With high levels of unipolar depressive symptoms (BDI-2 score of 17 or more).
* Sufficient understanding of English (spoken and written).
* Ability to give informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Clinical judgement of high level of suicide risk, other risk to self or others requiring other urgent approaches e.g. admission to mental health unit.
* Other severe mental illness e.g. psychosis, bipolar disorder, substance use disorder or organic mental disorder e.g. secondary to head injury as the primary mental health problem as determined by a structured psychiatric interview (SCID).
* Currently receiving structured psychological therapy
Minimum Eligible Age

16 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

30 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Nottingham

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Kapil Sayal, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

CLAHRC-EM, University of Nottingham

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Derbyshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust

Derby, Derbyshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Derbyshire Hoispitals NHS Foundation Trust

Derby, Derbyshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

Chesterfield, Deryshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS foundation Trust.

Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Beck AT. Beck Hopelessness Scale. The Psychological Corporation: San Antonio, Texas, 1988.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK. Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory-II. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation, 1996.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Bee PE, Bower P, Lovell K, Gilbody S, Richards D, Gask L, Roach P. Psychotherapy mediated by remote communication technologies: a meta-analytic review. BMC Psychiatry. 2008 Jul 22;8:60. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-8-60.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18647396 (View on PubMed)

EuroQol Group. EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990 Dec;16(3):199-208. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10109801 (View on PubMed)

Whittaker R, Merry S, Stasiak K, McDowell H, Doherty I, Shepherd M, Dorey E, Parag V, Ameratunga S, Rodgers A. MEMO--a mobile phone depression prevention intervention for adolescents: development process and postprogram findings on acceptability from a randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2012 Jan 24;14(1):e13. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1857.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22278284 (View on PubMed)

Witt KG, Hetrick SE, Rajaram G, Hazell P, Taylor Salisbury TL, Townsend E, Hawton K. Psychosocial interventions for self-harm in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 22;4(4):CD013668. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013668.pub2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33884617 (View on PubMed)

Sayal K, Roe J, Ball H, Atha C, Kaylor-Hughes C, Guo B, Townsend E, Morriss R. Feasibility of a randomised controlled trial of remotely delivered problem-solving cognitive behaviour therapy versus usual care for young people with depression and repeat self-harm: lessons learnt (e-DASH). BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Jan 24;19(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-2005-3.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30678674 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CLAHRC-EM 14059

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Depression Management Project
NCT01150604 COMPLETED NA
Bounce-Back From Depression
NCT06832605 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA
Treatment of Post-TBI Depression
NCT00211835 COMPLETED NA
Treating Suicidality Remotely
NCT06370104 RECRUITING NA
The Short-Term MBT Project
NCT03677037 COMPLETED PHASE3