RCT of the Clinical and Cost Effectiveness of Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT) Delivered Remotely Versus Treatment as Usual in Adolescents and Young Adults With Depression Who Repeatedly Self-harm
NCT ID: NCT02377011
Last Updated: 2018-01-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
22 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-01-31
2016-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Feasibility of Internet-delivered CBT for Adolescents With Depression
NCT04117789
Blended Cognitive Behavioural Therapy Versus Face-to-face Cognitive Behavioural Therapy
NCT02796573
ICBT for Depression - A Factorial Investigation of Kinds of Therapist Support and Self-/Expert-selected Content
NCT04260750
Efficacy and Cost-effectiveness of Internet-delivered CBT for Adolescents with Depression
NCT04977856
Comparing Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy Versus Mindfulness-Based Therapy for Autistic Adults
NCT06060860
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The NICE Clinical Guideline 133 on longer-term treatment of self-harm recommends between 3 to 12 sessions of psychological treatment involving problem solving and alternative coping. Presently however, the biggest at risk group for self-harm and suicide is not offered any psychological treatment.
Studies have shown that mobile phones are a highly acceptable method of engaging adolescents with depression in psychological treatments such as CBT (Whittaker et al 2012). Furthermore a systematic review has show that treatment delivery via remote technology is just as effective as face-to-face in people with anxiety or depression (Bee et al, 2008).
The study therefore has the following aims and objectives:
1. To optimise and determine the acceptability and feasibility of engaging and retaining patients with depression who repeatedly self-harm in a remotely delivered (through video calling/telephone) CBT intervention over 10 sessions.
2. To outline the barriers and drivers to delivering both the study and the remotely delivered PS CBT intervention and how barriers to the interventions are addressed through a network of practice or other means.
3. If the recruitment and retention into the study and the remotely delivered PS therapy are feasible and acceptable, then we will determine the clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness of the intervention versus treatment as usual.
4. If the intervention (pilot study) proves to be clinically effective and cost effective then the barriers and drivers to implementation in all counties in the East Midlands will be explored using a network of practice linking with NHS organisations, strategic clinical networks, and the AHSN (see qualitative analysis of barriers and drivers to the implementation of the intervention below).
The main hypothesis of this study is:
Adolescents and young adults who receive problem solving cognitive behaviour therapy (plus treatment as usual) will report greater reduction in their depressive symptoms (as measured using Beck depression inventory 2) from baseline to 6 months in comparison to those receiving treatment as usual.
Secondary objectives will be to observe a change over 12 months on measures of depression, hopelessness and suicidality.
Study configuration:
This study will compare two groups: participants will be randomly assigned to the TAU group (control group) or the remotely delivered PS CBT (and TAU) group (intervention group).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
PS CBT
Problem solving cognitive behaviour therapy (PS CBT) will be delivered remotely by means of telephone or video calling by a cognitive behaviour therapist in addition to their usual care.
The duration of the intervention will be 10 sessions. Research measures will be completed at baseline, 3,6,9 and 12 months
Problem solving cognitive behaviour therapy (PS CBT)
Treatment as Usual
Participants will not receive any CBT therapy in addition to their usual care. Research measures will be completed at baseline,3,6,9 and 12 months.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Problem solving cognitive behaviour therapy (PS CBT)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* With high levels of unipolar depressive symptoms (BDI-2 score of 17 or more).
* Sufficient understanding of English (spoken and written).
* Ability to give informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Other severe mental illness e.g. psychosis, bipolar disorder, substance use disorder or organic mental disorder e.g. secondary to head injury as the primary mental health problem as determined by a structured psychiatric interview (SCID).
* Currently receiving structured psychological therapy
16 Years
30 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Nottingham
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Kapil Sayal, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
CLAHRC-EM, University of Nottingham
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Derbyshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
Derby, Derbyshire, United Kingdom
Derbyshire Hoispitals NHS Foundation Trust
Derby, Derbyshire, United Kingdom
Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Chesterfield, Deryshire, United Kingdom
Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS foundation Trust.
Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Beck AT. Beck Hopelessness Scale. The Psychological Corporation: San Antonio, Texas, 1988.
Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK. Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory-II. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation, 1996.
Bee PE, Bower P, Lovell K, Gilbody S, Richards D, Gask L, Roach P. Psychotherapy mediated by remote communication technologies: a meta-analytic review. BMC Psychiatry. 2008 Jul 22;8:60. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-8-60.
EuroQol Group. EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990 Dec;16(3):199-208. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9.
Whittaker R, Merry S, Stasiak K, McDowell H, Doherty I, Shepherd M, Dorey E, Parag V, Ameratunga S, Rodgers A. MEMO--a mobile phone depression prevention intervention for adolescents: development process and postprogram findings on acceptability from a randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2012 Jan 24;14(1):e13. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1857.
Witt KG, Hetrick SE, Rajaram G, Hazell P, Taylor Salisbury TL, Townsend E, Hawton K. Psychosocial interventions for self-harm in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 22;4(4):CD013668. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013668.pub2.
Sayal K, Roe J, Ball H, Atha C, Kaylor-Hughes C, Guo B, Townsend E, Morriss R. Feasibility of a randomised controlled trial of remotely delivered problem-solving cognitive behaviour therapy versus usual care for young people with depression and repeat self-harm: lessons learnt (e-DASH). BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Jan 24;19(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-2005-3.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CLAHRC-EM 14059
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.