Blended Cognitive Behavioural Therapy Versus Face-to-face Cognitive Behavioural Therapy
NCT ID: NCT02796573
Last Updated: 2022-05-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
76 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-03-31
2020-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The presents study aims to investigate the potential of blending Internet based interventions with face-to-face consultations using cognitive behavioural therapy (B-CBT). The main hypotheses are, that that B-CBT will be as clinically effective as TAU, and that it will be acceptable to patients and clinicians.
The study is designed as a two arm randomised non-inferiority trial comparing internet based B-CBT for depression to treatment as usual (TAU) defined as 12 sessions of face-to-face CBT.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effectiveness of Telephone Versus Face-to-Face CBT in Treating People With Depression
NCT00498706
Blended Depression Therapy: Cognitive Behaviour Therapy Face-to-face and Via Internet
NCT02449447
ICBT for Depression - A Factorial Investigation of Kinds of Therapist Support and Self-/Expert-selected Content
NCT04260750
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Treatment of Depression With Smartphone Support
NCT01819025
iCBT for Depression - Standard Versus Condensed Treatment Material
NCT01788657
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
B-CBT
6 face-to-face consultations plus 6 online modules.
cognitive behavioural therapy
Face-to-Face CBT
12 face-to-face consultations.
cognitive behavioural therapy
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
cognitive behavioural therapy
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Meet Diagnostic and Statistic Manual of Mental Disorders 4th. edition (DSM-IV) diagnostic criteria for major depressive disorder as confirmed by the telephone administered Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview version 5.0 (MINI)and a score of 5 or higher on the Patient Health Questionnaire nine items (PHQ-9).
Exclusion Criteria
* Co-morbid substance dependence, bipolar affective disorder, psychotic illness, obsessive compulsive disorder, as established at the MINI interview.
* Currently receiving psychological treatment for depression in primary or specialised mental health care
* Being unable to comprehend the spoken and written language of Danish.
* Not having access to a computer and fast Internet connection (i.e. broadband or comparable)
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Southern Denmark
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Kim Mathiasen
Ph.D. fellow
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Centre for Telepsychiatry
Odense, Fyn, Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Doukani A, Quartagno M, Sera F, Free C, Kakuma R, Riper H, Kleiboer A, Cerga-Pashoja A, van Schaik A, Botella C, Berger T, Chevreul K, Matynia M, Krieger T, Hazo JB, Draisma S, Titzler I, Topooco N, Mathiasen K, Vernmark K, Urech A, Maj A, Andersson G, Berking M, Banos RM, Araya R. Comparison of the Working Alliance in Blended Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Treatment as Usual for Depression in Europe: Secondary Data Analysis of the E-COMPARED Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2024 May 31;26:e47515. doi: 10.2196/47515.
Mathiasen K, Andersen TE, Lichtenstein MB, Ehlers LH, Riper H, Kleiboer A, Roessler KK. The Clinical Effectiveness of Blended Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Compared With Face-to-Face Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Adult Depression: Randomized Controlled Noninferiority Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2022 Sep 7;24(9):e36577. doi: 10.2196/36577.
Mathiasen K, Andersen TE, Riper H, Kleiboer AA, Roessler KK. Blended CBT versus face-to-face CBT: a randomised non-inferiority trial. BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Dec 5;16(1):432. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-1140-y.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
S-20150150
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.