An Autobiographical Memory-Based Intervention for Suicidality

NCT ID: NCT06225531

Last Updated: 2024-11-12

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: COMPLETED
• Clinical Phase: NA
• Total Enrollment: 3 participants
• Study Classification: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2024-05-15
• Study Completion Date: 2024-08-21

Brief Summary

The study involves a short therapy intervention for people who are experiencing thoughts of suicide. The intervention will focus upon different memories from the person's life. These memories will vary in the emotions they evoke - some memories will be associated with neutral emotions, whereas others will bring up positive emotions. The intervention will have a particular focus upon memories of times when the participants have moved away from thinking about suicide, with the aim of reinforcing memories of what helped them to reconnect with life. The intervention will also introduce relaxation techniques, in addition to involving a safety planning component. The project aims to consider whether this intervention is acceptable and feasible for this population.

Detailed Description

This study is looking at whether an autobiographical memory-based intervention is acceptable and suitable for people with thoughts of suicide within a secondary mental health population. Autobiographical memory involves the recollection of past events in a person's own life, and this has been linked to a person's sense of identity, goals, and orientation in the present. Memories linked to negative emotions have been shown to be durable, accessible, and easily and vividly remembered. The power that memories of suicidal ideation and suicide attempts hold is therefore concerning. This intervention aims to support participants to more readily access positive and neutral autobiographical memories, using memory tasks and worksheets. By focusing upon individuals' moves away from suicidal thinking, it also aims to shift the focus onto remembering what led people to reconnect with life.

The study is an experimental case series using a non-concurrent A-B multiple baseline design, in which the participants first attend 3-5 baseline sessions prior to attending 6 intervention sessions. Sessions are one-to-one. The initial baseline session and all intervention sessions will take place face-to-face. The follow-up baseline sessions can be conducted in-person, online via Microsoft Teams, or via telephone, depending on participant preference.

The initial baseline session will involve assessing risk and updating participants' safety plan. The intervention involves 6 sessions of approximately one hour. The first session will focus upon familiarisation to concepts in the intervention, using imagery-based metaphors to support understanding. Sessions 2-4 will focus on different memories - neutral, positive, and memories of moves away from suicidal thinking. Memory tasks will broadly follow the 5 stages outlined in the broad-minded affective coping (BMAC) procedure, but with a focus on these specific memories. In the final 2 sessions, participants will have a choice around which memory to focus on. The final session will also involve post-intervention planning. Outcome measures will be completed in all baseline and intervention sessions.

The study aims to recruit 5-7 participants from community mental health teams (CMHTs) in which supervisory support can be arranged. The intervention will be conducted by the principle investigator (AP), a trainee psychologist, under the supervision of clinical psychologists within the CMHTs (JK and NI) who are also members of the research team.

Conditions

Suicidal Ideation; Mental Health Disorder

Study Design

• Allocation Method: NA
• Intervention Model: SINGLE_GROUP
• Primary Study Purpose: OTHER
• Blinding Strategy: NONE

Study Groups

Autobiographical Memory Based Intervention

All participants will be placed into the intervention arm, in which the participants will receive 6 autobiographical memory based intervention sessions, lasting approximately one hour.

Baseline lengths will vary from 3 - 5 sessions, with the initial session lasting approximately one hour, and follow up sessions lasting approximately 30 minutes. This randomisation is 1) to enable the effects of treatment to be separated from the effects of time seen clinically and 2) in order to control for the therapeutic value of contact.

Group Type: EXPERIMENTAL

Autobiographical Memory Based Intervention

Intervention Type: OTHER

The intervention involves 6 sessions of therapeutic input based around autobiographical memories. Memory based activities will broadly follow the 5 stages outlines in the broad-minded affective coping (BMAC) procedure, but with a focus on specific memories. It will follow the following structure:

Session 1 - Introduction and Familiarisation Session 2 - Neutral Memories Session 3 - Positive Memories Session 4 - Memories of Moves Away from Suicidality Session 5 - Practice of Preferred Memory (from Sessions 2-4) Session 6 - Continued Practice and Post-Intervention Planning

Interventions

Autobiographical Memory Based Intervention

The intervention involves 6 sessions of therapeutic input based around autobiographical memories. Memory based activities will broadly follow the 5 stages outlines in the broad-minded affective coping (BMAC) procedure, but with a focus on specific memories. It will follow the following structure:

Session 1 - Introduction and Familiarisation Session 2 - Neutral Memories Session 3 - Positive Memories Session 4 - Memories of Moves Away from Suicidality Session 5 - Practice of Preferred Memory (from Sessions 2-4) Session 6 - Continued Practice and Post-Intervention Planning

Intervention Type: OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• Individual has experienced suicidal ideation and/or suicidal behaviours within the previous 3 months. This will be screened for by asking the questions:

1. Have you had thoughts or images of ending your life within the past three months? or

2. Have you attempted to end your life within the past 3 months?

• Currently under a Community Mental Health Team (CMHT) within which supervisory support can be arranged.

Exclusion Criteria

• Moderate/severe learning disability
• Organic cerebral disease/injury which significantly affects language comprehension or expression
• Non-English speaking
• Acute psychosis which would affect engagement
• Receiving psychological treatment or participating in another research intervention
• At imminent risk of acting upon thoughts of suicide or of harm to others. This will be screened for by assessing for the presence of active intent or plans to harm themselves or others within the next month. If these individuals consent to be contacted again after a month, the researcher will consider approaching them again to assess for changes to imminent risk. If the individual met the eligibility criteria at this point, the individual would be invited to take part in the study.
• A history of violence or harm to others to a degree in which clinicians have assessed one-to-one sessions to be unsafe
• Currently within an inpatient setting or open to a home-based treatment team.

• Minimum Eligible Age: 18 Years
• Maximum Eligible Age: 65 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes

Sponsors

Lancaster University

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Alexandra Powell

Trainee Clinical Psychologist

Responsibility Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

James Kelly, ClinPsyD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Lancaster University

Locations

Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust

Manchester, , United Kingdom

Countries

United Kingdom

References

Gershman SJ. Predicting the Past, Remembering the Future. Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2017 Oct;17:7-13. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.05.025. Epub 2017 Jun 9.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 28920071 (View on PubMed)

Johnson, J., Gooding, P.A., Wood, A.M. et al. A Therapeutic Tool for Boosting Mood: The Broad-Minded Affective Coping Procedure (BMAC). Cogn Ther Res 37, 61-70 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-012-9453-8

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Hatcher, R. L., & Gillaspy, J. A. (2006). Development and validation of a revised short version of the working alliance inventory. Psychotherapy Research, 16(1), 12-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503300500352500

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Hutton, P. (2016). Positive Clinical Psychology and the Promotion of Happiness, Compassion, and Autonomy in People with Psychosis. In The Wiley Handbook of Positive Clinical Psychology (pp. 245-260). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118468197.ch17

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Gilbert P, Allan S. The role of defeat and entrapment (arrested flight) in depression: an exploration of an evolutionary view. Psychol Med. 1998 May;28(3):585-98. doi: 10.1017/s0033291798006710.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 9626715 (View on PubMed)

De Beurs D, Cleare S, Wetherall K, Eschle-Byrne S, Ferguson E, B O'Connor D, C O'Connor R. Entrapment and suicide risk: The development of the 4-item Entrapment Scale Short-Form (E-SF). Psychiatry Res. 2020 Feb;284:112765. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112765. Epub 2020 Jan 9.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 31945600 (View on PubMed)

Talmi D, Anderson AK, Riggs L, Caplan JB, Moscovitch M. Immediate memory consequences of the effect of emotion on attention to pictures. Learn Mem. 2008 Mar 5;15(3):172-82. doi: 10.1101/lm.722908. Print 2008 Mar.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 18323572 (View on PubMed)

Williams JM, Barnhofer T, Crane C, Herman D, Raes F, Watkins E, Dalgleish T. Autobiographical memory specificity and emotional disorder. Psychol Bull. 2007 Jan;133(1):122-48. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.133.1.122.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 17201573 (View on PubMed)

Williams SE, Ford JH, Kensinger EA. The power of negative and positive episodic memories. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2022 Oct;22(5):869-903. doi: 10.3758/s13415-022-01013-z. Epub 2022 Jun 14.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 35701665 (View on PubMed)

Sekhon M, Cartwright M, Francis JJ. Acceptability of healthcare interventions: an overview of reviews and development of a theoretical framework. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jan 26;17(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2031-8.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 28126032 (View on PubMed)

Busner J, Targum SD. The clinical global impressions scale: applying a research tool in clinical practice. Psychiatry (Edgmont). 2007 Jul;4(7):28-37.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 20526405 (View on PubMed)

Taylor CDJ, Bee PE, Kelly J, Emsley R, Haddock G. iMAgery focused psychological therapy for persecutory delusions in PSychosis (iMAPS): a multiple baseline experimental case series. Behav Cogn Psychother. 2020 Sep;48(5):530-545. doi: 10.1017/S1352465820000168. Epub 2020 Apr 8.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 32264985 (View on PubMed)

Van Orden KA, Cukrowicz KC, Witte TK, Joiner TE. Thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness: construct validity and psychometric properties of the Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire. Psychol Assess. 2012 Mar;24(1):197-215. doi: 10.1037/a0025358. Epub 2011 Sep 19.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 21928908 (View on PubMed)

Posner K, Brown GK, Stanley B, Brent DA, Yershova KV, Oquendo MA, Currier GW, Melvin GA, Greenhill L, Shen S, Mann JJ. The Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale: initial validity and internal consistency findings from three multisite studies with adolescents and adults. Am J Psychiatry. 2011 Dec;168(12):1266-77. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.10111704.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 22193671 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

316697

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id