Exploring the Effectiveness of a Suicide Ideation Prevention Program: Reframe-IT+

NCT ID: NCT06759441

Last Updated: 2025-06-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

75 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-06-03

Study Completion Date

2024-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Suicide is a leading cause of death among young people, with worldwide prevalence rates of suicidal ideation, suicidal ideation with a plan, and suicide attempts in youth aged 14-21 years. These behaviors have a significant negative impact on individuals, families, and the community at large. In Latin America, including Chile, suicide rates have increased in recent decades. Youth suicide prevention is a public health priority in Chile, although evidence-based interventions of high quality are lacking.

Secondary schools are a suitable and accessible setting for youth suicide prevention programs, with interventions that raise awareness about suicide and improve skills to reduce suicide attempts and suicidal ideation. Despite the effectiveness of interventions such as cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), these are less common in school settings, although digital technologies offer a potentially efficient way to implement suicide prevention programs in schools.

The Reframe-IT program is an Internet-based cognitive-behavioral therapy designed to reduce suicidal ideation in youth, supported by school wellness staff. Studies in Australia demonstrated the effectiveness and acceptability of Reframe-IT, although it is suggested that digital interventions may have a greater impact when combined with face-to-face sessions.

This study examined the acceptability and feasibility of a combined intervention that included Reframe-IT and four additional in-person sessions for adolescents in Chile. It is suggested that these combined interventions could be a promising strategy for youth suicide prevention in school settings, especially in Latin American countries where mental health support is limited.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Suicide is a leading cause of death among young people and suicide-related behaviors (SRBs) are common. Worldwide, 12-month prevalence rates of suicidal ideation, suicidal ideation with a plan, and suicide attempts in youth aged 14-21 years are 15.4-18.4%, 7.9-10.9%, and 5.7-7.1%, respectively. Suicide and suicide-related behaviors have a significant negative impact on individuals' family, friends, and the broader community. It may also increase the risk of subsequent suicides in those exposed to death by suicide. In Latin America, suicide rates have increased over the past two decades, with Chile having one of the highest rates in the region (8.0/100,000 per year, 13.4 for men and 3.0 for women). Youth suicide prevention is a key public health priority in Chile, but limited high-quality, evidence-based interventions are available.

Secondary schools are an appropriate and accessible setting for youth suicide prevention programs and have been identified as a relevant prevention setting in national and international prevention strategies. Interventions implemented in school settings have a broad reach and facilitate prevention programs to support adolescents on a large scale. School-based prevention programs have been shown to increase suicide awareness and improve skills to reduce suicidal attempts and ideation. Indicated interventions focused on the application of clinical or psychosocial interventions (e.g., cognitive-behavioral therapy, CBT) for at-risk groups have been less common in school settings. However, evidence for these interventions is widely established in other contexts, and further school-based research on such programs is warranted.

Digital technologies are a potentially viable and efficient way to implement and scale up suicide prevention programs in schools. While digital suicide prevention programs have been shown to be safe and effective, only a small number of studies have relied on digital technologies in school settings. This is a missed opportunity, as research suggests that digital interventions for other mental health problems, such as depression and anxiety, are acceptable and minimize youth concerns regarding privacy, safety, stigma, and anonymity that may be associated with in-person programs. Digital programs may also reduce costs and increase accessibility to support when resource constraints may hinder access to services. This combination of factors has sparked significant international interest in finding technology-based solutions for suicide prevention.

The Reframe-IT program is an Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) program that aims to reduce suicidal ideation in youth. Reframe-IT's eight online modules have a unique focus on youth, and the program is distinguished by being designed to be facilitated and supported by school wellness staff. The staff support component is an important feature, as research suggests that digital programs delivered with support from clinicians have better treatment outcomes, lower dropout rates, and improved adherence. Reframe-IT was piloted in two phases in Australia. During the first phase, a case series study was conducted using pre- and post-tests, and results indicated that the program was associated with decreased suicidal thoughts, depression, and feelings of hopelessness. For the second phase, a pilot randomized controlled trial demonstrated that those who received the intervention had greater (although not statistically significant, due to being underpowered) reductions in suicidal ideation, depression, and hopelessness compared to the control group. Participants provided positive feedback on Reframe-IT in both studies, and it was not associated with any iatrogenic effects. Reframe-IT is currently part of a large randomized controlled trial in Australia.

Previous studies have shown that stand-alone digital interventions might have a lower impact than when combined with face-to-face sessions (26). One possible explanation suggests that face-to-face sessions may reinforce the therapeutic alliance, promoting adherence and efficacy in the digital intervention (27, 28). To our knowledge, no previous study has used combined interventions to reduce SRB delivered in school settings. The small body of evidence available suggests that school-based digital interventions targeting at-risk youth are a promising avenue for suicide prevention, primarily where mental health support is limited (29). It has been suggested that developing and testing this type of intervention is suitable in Latin American countries (30). The Reframe-IT program was adapted for Chilean youth to address this need. The current study examined the acceptability and feasibility of a combined intervention that included Reframe-IT plus four additional in-person sessions for adolescents.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Suicidal Ideation Depression Anxiety Hopelessness

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

This study has a quasi-experimental design, without a control group with pre-post intervention evaluation. This design is suitable to start the study of an intervention and its applicability to the target population, especially when it comes to interventions that have multiple components. This type of study allows determining changes in behavior before and after the intervention in the same subjects, which allows exploring possible effects of this intervention. This study hopes to generate evidence of the effectiveness of the intervention, taking into account the limitations of the generalization of these results as it is a quasi-experimental study.
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intervention group

Participants will receive an individual intervention (Reframe-It+) based on cognitive behavioral therapy, with a focus on problem-solving and help-seeking, which is carried out at the Educational Establishment with a trained psychologist. It consists of 13 weekly sessions of 25 minutes each, of which 5 sessions have a face-to-face component and 8 sessions have a face-to-face-digital component where students use a computer always in the company of a psychologist facilitating the program.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Reframe-It+

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Reframe-IT+ is an individual intervention based on cognitive behavioral therapy, with a problem-solving and help-seeking approach, which is carried out at the Educational Establishment with a trained psychologist. It consists of 13 weekly sessions of 25 minutes each, of which 5 sessions have a face-to-face component and 8 sessions have a face-to-face-digital component where students use a computer always in the company of a psychologist facilitating the program.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Reframe-It+

Reframe-IT+ is an individual intervention based on cognitive behavioral therapy, with a problem-solving and help-seeking approach, which is carried out at the Educational Establishment with a trained psychologist. It consists of 13 weekly sessions of 25 minutes each, of which 5 sessions have a face-to-face component and 8 sessions have a face-to-face-digital component where students use a computer always in the company of a psychologist facilitating the program.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Students in first, second and third year of secondary school from educational establishments with high socioeconomic vulnerability.
* Students who attend educational establishments located in Santiago (Chile).
* Students who attend educational establishments with secondary education (first to fourth year of secondary school).
* Students who attend mixed educational establishments.
* Students who attend educational establishments with at least two courses in first, second and third year of secondary school.
* Students who attend educational establishments with at least 30 students per course.
* Students who attend educational establishments with vulnerability (≥55%), measured with the School Vulnerability Index - National Allocation System for Equality (IVE-SINAE). This index is the proportion of students in each school with high vulnerability. This index considers the following socioeconomic variables to group schools: mother's educational level, father's educational level, and total monthly household income, among others.
* Students who score high in suicidal ideation in the past month (score ≥ 3 on the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS).

Exclusion Criteria

* Students with severe depressive symptoms assessed by the PHQ-9 (\>19 points).
* Students with high severity of psychotic symptoms assessed by the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences-Positive Scale (CAPE, P15) with score ≥ 3 on items n°13 and/or n°14 and/or n°15.
* Students with suicide attempt(s) in the past month.
Minimum Eligible Age

14 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

17 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Fundación Crecer y Sanar

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Talca

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Universidad de los Andes, Chile

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jorge Gaete

Full Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jorge Gaete, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Universidad de Los Andes

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Universidad de los Andes

Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, Chile

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Chile

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

World Health Organization. Suicide worldwide in 2019: global health estimates. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021. Contract No.: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Van Meter AR, Knowles EA, Mintz EH. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis: International Prevalence of Suicidal Ideation and Attempt in Youth. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2023 Sep;62(9):973-986. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2022.07.867. Epub 2022 Dec 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 36563876 (View on PubMed)

Pitman A, Osborn D, King M, Erlangsen A. Effects of suicide bereavement on mental health and suicide risk. Lancet Psychiatry. 2014 Jun;1(1):86-94. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(14)70224-X. Epub 2014 Jun 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26360405 (View on PubMed)

Hawton K, Hill NTM, Gould M, John A, Lascelles K, Robinson J. Clustering of suicides in children and adolescents. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020 Jan;4(1):58-67. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(19)30335-9. Epub 2019 Oct 9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31606323 (View on PubMed)

Hill NTM, Robinson J, Pirkis J, Andriessen K, Krysinska K, Payne A, Boland A, Clarke A, Milner A, Witt K, Krohn S, Lampit A. Association of suicidal behavior with exposure to suicide and suicide attempt: A systematic review and multilevel meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2020 Mar 31;17(3):e1003074. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003074. eCollection 2020 Mar.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32231381 (View on PubMed)

Hill NTM, Too LS, Spittal MJ, Robinson J. Understanding the characteristics and mechanisms underlying suicide clusters in Australian youth: a comparison of cluster detection methods. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2020 Aug 6;29:e151. doi: 10.1017/S2045796020000645.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32758330 (View on PubMed)

Teti GL, Rebok F, Rojas SM, Grendas L, Daray FM. Systematic review of risk factors for suicide and suicide attempt among psychiatric patients in Latin America and Caribbean. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2014 Aug;36(2):124-33.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25345534 (View on PubMed)

Ministerio de Salud. Chile. Informe de la década de mortalidad por suicidio. Santiago, Chile: Oficina de Vigilancia de Enfermedades No Transmisibles y Encuestas Poblacionales, Departamento de Epidemiología, Ministerio de Salud; 2022.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Schilling SH, Carreno A, Tapia E, Mascayano F, Pitronello R, Santander F, Jorquera MJ, Burrone MS, Alvarado RV. Experts by Experience: Qualitative Evaluation of Adolescent Participation in the Development of a Technological Intervention to Prevent Youth Suicide in Chile. Front Psychiatry. 2021 Jan 25;11:522057. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.522057. eCollection 2020.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33603681 (View on PubMed)

Robinson J, Cox G, Malone A, Williamson M, Baldwin G, Fletcher K, O'Brien M. A systematic review of school-based interventions aimed at preventing, treating, and responding to suicide- related behavior in young people. Crisis. 2013;34(3):164-82. doi: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000168.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23195455 (View on PubMed)

World Health Organization. Live life: an implementation guide for suicide prevention in countries. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021. Contract No.: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Calear AL, Christensen H, Freeman A, Fenton K, Busby Grant J, van Spijker B, Donker T. A systematic review of psychosocial suicide prevention interventions for youth. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2016 May;25(5):467-82. doi: 10.1007/s00787-015-0783-4. Epub 2015 Oct 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26472117 (View on PubMed)

Brann KL, Baker D, Smith-Millman MK, Watt SJ, DiOrio C. A meta-analysis of suicide prevention programs for school-aged youth. Children and Youth Services Review. 2021;121:105826.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Wasserman D, Hoven CW, Wasserman C, Wall M, Eisenberg R, Hadlaczky G, Kelleher I, Sarchiapone M, Apter A, Balazs J, Bobes J, Brunner R, Corcoran P, Cosman D, Guillemin F, Haring C, Iosue M, Kaess M, Kahn JP, Keeley H, Musa GJ, Nemes B, Postuvan V, Saiz P, Reiter-Theil S, Varnik A, Varnik P, Carli V. School-based suicide prevention programmes: the SEYLE cluster-randomised, controlled trial. Lancet. 2015 Apr 18;385(9977):1536-44. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61213-7. Epub 2015 Jan 9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25579833 (View on PubMed)

Singer JB, Erbacher TA, Rosen P. School-Based Suicide Prevention: A Framework for Evidence-Based Practice. School Mental Health. 2019;11(1):54-71.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Breet E, Matooane M, Tomlinson M, Bantjes J. Systematic review and narrative synthesis of suicide prevention in high-schools and universities: a research agenda for evidence-based practice. BMC Public Health. 2021 Jun 10;21(1):1116. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11124-w.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34112141 (View on PubMed)

Lai MH, Maniam T, Chan LF, Ravindran AV. Caught in the web: a review of web-based suicide prevention. J Med Internet Res. 2014 Jan 28;16(1):e30. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2973.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24472876 (View on PubMed)

Stefanopoulou E, Hogarth H, Taylor M, Russell-Haines K, Lewis D, Larkin J. Are digital interventions effective in reducing suicidal ideation and self-harm? A systematic review. J Ment Health. 2020 Apr;29(2):207-216. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2020.1714009. Epub 2020 Jan 28.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31989852 (View on PubMed)

Torok M, Han J, Baker S, Werner-Seidler A, Wong I, Larsen ME, Christensen H. Suicide prevention using self-guided digital interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Jan;2(1):e25-e36. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(19)30199-2. Epub 2019 Nov 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33328037 (View on PubMed)

Cuijpers P, van Straten A, Andersson G. Internet-administered cognitive behavior therapy for health problems: a systematic review. J Behav Med. 2008 Apr;31(2):169-77. doi: 10.1007/s10865-007-9144-1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18165893 (View on PubMed)

Lehtimaki S, Martic J, Wahl B, Foster KT, Schwalbe N. Evidence on Digital Mental Health Interventions for Adolescents and Young People: Systematic Overview. JMIR Ment Health. 2021 Apr 29;8(4):e25847. doi: 10.2196/25847.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33913817 (View on PubMed)

Robinson J, Hetrick S, Cox G, Bendall S, Yuen HP, Yung A, Pirkis J. Can an Internet-based intervention reduce suicidal ideation, depression and hopelessness among secondary school students: results from a pilot study. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2016 Feb;10(1):28-35. doi: 10.1111/eip.12137. Epub 2014 Mar 31.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24684946 (View on PubMed)

Hetrick SE, Yuen HP, Bailey E, Cox GR, Templer K, Rice SM, Bendall S, Robinson J. Internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy for young people with suicide-related behaviour (Reframe-IT): a randomised controlled trial. Evid Based Ment Health. 2017 Aug;20(3):76-82. doi: 10.1136/eb-2017-102719. Epub 2017 Jul 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28701336 (View on PubMed)

Robinson J, Hetrick S, Cox G, Bendall S, Yung A, Pirkis J. The safety and acceptability of delivering an online intervention to secondary students at risk of suicide: findings from a pilot study. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2015 Dec;9(6):498-506. doi: 10.1111/eip.12136. Epub 2014 Mar 31.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24684927 (View on PubMed)

Byrne SJ, Bailey E, Lamblin M, McKay S, Pirkis J, Mihalopoulos C, Spittal MJ, Rice S, Hetrick S, Hamilton M, Yuen HP, Lee YY, Boland A, Robinson J. Study protocol for the Multimodal Approach to Preventing Suicide in Schools (MAPSS) project: a regionally based randomised trial of an integrated response to suicide risk among secondary school students. Trials. 2022 Mar 2;23(1):186. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06072-8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35236397 (View on PubMed)

Rasing SPA, Stikkelbroek YAJ, Bodden DHM. Is Digital Treatment the Holy Grail? Literature Review on Computerized and Blended Treatment for Depressive Disorders in Youth. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 24;17(1):153. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17010153.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31878249 (View on PubMed)

Garrido S, Millington C, Cheers D, Boydell K, Schubert E, Meade T, Nguyen QV. What Works and What Doesn't Work? A Systematic Review of Digital Mental Health Interventions for Depression and Anxiety in Young People. Front Psychiatry. 2019 Nov 13;10:759. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00759. eCollection 2019.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31798468 (View on PubMed)

Leavey K, Hawkins R. Is cognitive behavioural therapy effective in reducing suicidal ideation and behaviour when delivered face-to-face or via e-health? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cogn Behav Ther. 2017 Sep;46(5):353-374. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2017.1332095. Epub 2017 Jun 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28621202 (View on PubMed)

Mascayano F, Schilling S, Tapia E, Santander F, Burrone MS, Yang LH, Alvarado R. Using Information and Communication Technologies to Prevent Suicide Among Secondary School Students in Two Regions of Chile: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Front Psychiatry. 2018 Jun 5;9:236. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00236. eCollection 2018.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29922187 (View on PubMed)

Jimenez-Molina A, Franco P, Martinez V, Martinez P, Rojas G, Araya R. Internet-Based Interventions for the Prevention and Treatment of Mental Disorders in Latin America: A Scoping Review. Front Psychiatry. 2019 Sep 13;10:664. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00664. eCollection 2019.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31572242 (View on PubMed)

Nunez D, Gaete J, Meza D, Andaur J, Robinson J. Testing the Effectiveness of a Blended Intervention to Reduce Suicidal Ideation among School Adolescents in Chile: A Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 26;19(7):3947. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19073947.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35409630 (View on PubMed)

Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11556941 (View on PubMed)

Argyropoulos SV, Ploubidis GB, Wright TS, Palm ME, Hood SD, Nash JR, Taylor AC, Forshall SW, Anderson IM, Nutt DJ, Potokar JP. Development and validation of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Inventory (GADI). J Psychopharmacol. 2007 Mar;21(2):145-52. doi: 10.1177/0269881107069944.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17329293 (View on PubMed)

Posner K, Brown GK, Stanley B, Brent DA, Yershova KV, Oquendo MA, Currier GW, Melvin GA, Greenhill L, Shen S, Mann JJ. The Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale: initial validity and internal consistency findings from three multisite studies with adolescents and adults. Am J Psychiatry. 2011 Dec;168(12):1266-77. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.10111704.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22193671 (View on PubMed)

Capra C, Kavanagh DJ, Hides L, Scott JG. Current CAPE-15: a measure of recent psychotic-like experiences and associated distress. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2017 Oct;11(5):411-417. doi: 10.1111/eip.12245. Epub 2015 May 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25962504 (View on PubMed)

Reynolds WM. Suicidal ideation questionnaire: Professional manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources; 1988.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

D'Zurilla TJ, Chang EC, Nottingham EJ 4th, Faccini L. Social problem-solving deficits and hopelessness, depression, and suicidal risk in college students and psychiatric inpatients. J Clin Psychol. 1998 Dec;54(8):1091-107. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4679(199812)54:83.0.co;2-j.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9840781 (View on PubMed)

Beck AT, Steer RA. Manual for the Beck hopelessness scale. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation. 1988.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Jacob KL, Christopher MS, Neuhaus EC. Development and validation of the cognitive-behavioral therapy skills questionnaire. Behav Modif. 2011 Nov;35(6):595-618. doi: 10.1177/0145445511419254. Epub 2011 Sep 5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21893554 (View on PubMed)

Gullone E, Taffe J. The Emotion Regulation Questionnaire for Children and Adolescents (ERQ-CA): a psychometric evaluation. Psychol Assess. 2012 Jun;24(2):409-17. doi: 10.1037/a0025777. Epub 2011 Oct 24.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22023559 (View on PubMed)

Ravens-Sieberer U, Erhart M, Rajmil L, Herdman M, Auquier P, Bruil J, Power M, Duer W, Abel T, Czemy L, Mazur J, Czimbalmos A, Tountas Y, Hagquist C, Kilroe J; European KIDSCREEN Group. Reliability, construct and criterion validity of the KIDSCREEN-10 score: a short measure for children and adolescents' well-being and health-related quality of life. Qual Life Res. 2010 Dec;19(10):1487-500. doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9706-5. Epub 2010 Jul 30.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20668950 (View on PubMed)

Valdes JM, Diaz FJ, Christiansen PM, Lorca GA, Solorza FJ, Alvear M, Ramirez S, Nunez D, Araya R, Gaete J. Mental Health and Related Factors Among Undergraduate Students During SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study. Front Psychiatry. 2022 May 31;13:833263. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.833263. eCollection 2022.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35711588 (View on PubMed)

Nunez D, Arias V, Vogel E, Gomez L. Internal structure of the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences-Positive (CAPE-P15) scale: Evidence for a general factor. Schizophr Res. 2015 Jul;165(2-3):236-42. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2015.04.018. Epub 2015 Apr 30.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25935814 (View on PubMed)

Davis JM. Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment. 1992;10(3):298-301.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Nuñez D, Villacura-Herrera C, Gaete J, Meza D, Andaur J, Robinson J. Psychometric assessment of the Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire Junior: A two-study validation in Spanish-speaking adolescents. Current Psychology. 2023.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

De La Torre MT, Morera OF, Wood JM. Measuring social problem solving using the Spanish version for Hispanics of the Social Problem Solving Inventory-Revised. Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2010 Oct;16(4):501-6. doi: 10.1037/a0021372.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21058813 (View on PubMed)

Crockett MA, Martinez V, Jimenez-Molina A. Subthreshold depression in adolescence: Gender differences in prevalence, clinical features, and associated factors. J Affect Disord. 2020 Jul 1;272:269-276. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.03.111. Epub 2020 Apr 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32553367 (View on PubMed)

Beck AT, Brown G, Berchick RJ, Stewart BL, Steer RA. Relationship between hopelessness and ultimate suicide: a replication with psychiatric outpatients. Am J Psychiatry. 1990 Feb;147(2):190-5. doi: 10.1176/ajp.147.2.190.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 2278535 (View on PubMed)

Alamo P. C, Baader M. T, Antúnez S. Z, Bagladi L. V, Bejer T. T. Escala de desesperanza de Beck como instrumento útil para detectar riesgo de suicidio en universitarios chilenos. Revista chilena de neuro-psiquiatría. 2019;57:167-75.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Pastor MC, Lopez-Penades R, Cifre E, Moliner-Urdiales D. The Spanish Version of the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire for Children and Adolescents (ERQ-CA): A Psychometric Evaluation in Early Adolescence. Span J Psychol. 2019 May 31;22:E30. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2019.30.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31148532 (View on PubMed)

Villacura-Herrera C, Gaete J, Andaur J, Meza D, Robinson J, Núñez D. Evidence for validity, reliability and measurement invariance of the emotion regulation questionnaire for children and adolescents (ERQ-CA) in secondary students from Chile. Current Psychology. 2022.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Baader T, Molina JL, Venezian S, Rojas C, Farías R, Fierro-Freixenet C, et al. Validación y utilidad de la encuesta PHQ-9 (Patient Health Questionnaire) en el diagnóstico de depresión en pacientes usuarios de atención primaria en Chile. Revista chilena de neuro-psiquiatría. 2012;50(1):10-22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Garcia-Campayo J, Zamorano E, Ruiz MA, Pardo A, Perez-Paramo M, Lopez-Gomez V, Freire O, Rejas J. Cultural adaptation into Spanish of the generalized anxiety disorder-7 (GAD-7) scale as a screening tool. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010 Jan 20;8:8. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-8-8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20089179 (View on PubMed)

Erhart M, Ottova V, Gaspar T, Jericek H, Schnohr C, Alikasifoglu M, Morgan A, Ravens-Sieberer U; HBSC Positive Health Focus Group. Measuring mental health and well-being of school-children in 15 European countries using the KIDSCREEN-10 Index. Int J Public Health. 2009 Sep;54 Suppl 2:160-6. doi: 10.1007/s00038-009-5407-7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19652910 (View on PubMed)

The World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment (WHOQOL): position paper from the World Health Organization. Soc Sci Med. 1995 Nov;41(10):1403-9. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00112-k.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8560308 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

FCS 202401

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Behavioral Activation With Depressed Adolescents
NCT01137149 UNKNOWN PHASE1/PHASE2
Treating Suicidality Remotely
NCT06370104 RECRUITING NA