Efficacy and Safety of the Physical Activity Program in Women With Post-menopausal Osteoporosis
NCT ID: NCT04179903
Last Updated: 2023-09-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
52 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-02-01
2021-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The investigators hypothesize that effectiveness and safety of the exercise program are equal when administered as gym trainer or individual home trainer. However, the investigators expect differences in adherence among the two groups which may cause different impact on the outcome measures.
Given the large amount of evidence on the efficacy of Physical Activity in women with Osteoporosis, the investigators considered it ethically unacceptable to advise a control group inactivity. On the other hand, it seemed particularly relevant for the purpose of addressing the advice to the improvement of the active lifestyle, to evaluate the impact of the ACTLIFE exercise program when administered as gym trainer or individual home trainer
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effects of Physical Exercise to Prevent Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Women
NCT03091088
Bone Health in Postmenopausal Women: The Effect of Exercise With or Without Medication for Osteoporosis
NCT07267325
Effects of Physical Training on Bone Turnover and Quality of Life in Osteopenic Postmenopausal Women.
NCT03195517
Prevention of Osteoporosis: Effects of Mini-trampoline Training on the Bone Remodeling
NCT04942691
Treatment Exercises With Core Stability and Dynamic Resistance Exercise for Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis
NCT06264401
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
It is aimed at evaluating differences in efficacy and safety of a PA program specifically designed for improving physical function and, here in after, QoL in post menopausal women with Osteoporosis (T-score \<-2,5) under usual pharmacological treatment, when administered as gyms as group training (GGT) or Individual Home Training IHT. During the study patients will be recommended to maintain their usual pharmacological treatment for OP, as prescribed.
The primary objective of the study is to compare modifications of QoL measured with the Short Osteoporosis Quality of Life Questionnaire (ECOS-16) induced by the ACTLIFE exercise programme when administered as IHT or GGT. ECOS-16 is a specific-disease instrument with the purpose to measure the health related QoL (HRQoL) in post menopausal women with OP.
The secondary objectives of the study are to investigate differences between IHT and GGT on domains which are considered to be determinants of QoL:
* WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) which evaluates the six activity and participation domains of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF): cognition, mobility, self-care, interacting with other people, life activities, participation.
* Fear of falls evaluated by the Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I);
* Walking (6-Minute Walk Test), standing balance (stability Index), muscle force (hand grip), postural alignment (occiput-wall distance) and joint mobility will be also evaluated as fundamental prerequisites of motor behavior;
* Body Mass index and body composition.
The adherence of each patient to the exercise program will be monitored. The adherence will be measured as percent of exercise sessions actually performed /total number of scheduled exercise sessions. The investigators hypothesize that effectiveness and safety of the exercise program are equal when administered as GGT or IHT. However, the investigators expect differences in adherence among the two groups which may cause different impact on the outcome measures. In the context of the evaluation of adherence to the program, the satisfaction of the participants for the ACTLIFE program administered as GGT or IHT at the end of the 12 months of exercise will be evaluated with a specific questionnaire based on 7-point Likert scale and the reasons of abandoning the exercise program (question with structured answers). Education attainment, work activity, marital status and home-gym distance will be also recorded since recognized to influence the adherence in an exercise program.
The ultimate goal of the ACTLIFE exercise program is to increase physical activity in a sedentary population. The exercise program, through its beneficial effects on health, is expected to generate a virtuous circle of greater activity and participation. In this context, to evaluate differences between GGT or IHT, the investigators introduced in the study protocol the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE). PASE is an easily scored survey designed specifically to measure the weekly physical activity in adult and aged population. Its score combines information on leisure, household and occupational activity.
RT with two parallel groups: in the first group the 12-month ACTLIFE program is performed as IHT, while in the second as GGT. The study will be single blinded since professionals who will evaluate patients will not know to which exercise group they have been assigned. Patients will be assessed at baseline and after 6 and 12 months.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Gym Trainer
Physical Activity program is performed in a group in a gym (Gym Group Training-GGT), with activity sessions conducted by a trainer graduated in Science and Techniques of Preventive and Adapted Physical Activity
Physical activity
Physical Activity program is performed in a group in a gym and at home
Individual Home
Physical Activity program is performed at home individually (Individual Home Training-IHT), without the supervision of a trainer during the exercise session.
Physical activity
Physical Activity program is performed in a group in a gym and at home
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Physical activity
Physical Activity program is performed in a group in a gym and at home
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* post menopausal women aged \>40 years (with or without history of fractures, with or without pharmacological therapy for OP)
* lumbar spine or femur T-score ≤-2,5
* functional motor capacity normal or moderately reduced (Short Physical Performance Battery)
* sedentary life style (having exercised less than 30 minutes per week in the last 6 months).
Exclusion Criteria
* heart failure (NYHA class \>2);
* unstable angina, pulmonary disease requiring oxygen therapy;
* symptomatic peripheral arteriopathy;
* myocardial infarction or hospital admission in the previous 6 months,
* symptomatic orthostatic hypotension;
* hypertension in poor pharmacologic control (diastolic \>95 mmHg, systolic \>160 mmHg),
* previous implant of prosthesis at upper or lower limbs,
* relevant neurological condition impairing motor or cognitive function, any other condition that the medical doctor (MD) considers to contraindicate the participation in an exercise program of moderate intensity.
40 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Bologna
OTHER
Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Claudio Ripamonti
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
IOR
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
Bologna, , Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
45/18
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.