Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Safe at Home Program
NCT ID: NCT04163549
Last Updated: 2022-07-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
404 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-11-19
2021-09-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
1. Determine the potential effectiveness of Safe at Home program on improvements of family functioning and secondary outcomes of reductions in intimate partner violence and child maltreatment
2. Determine the potential effectiveness of the Safe at Home program on changes in pathway outcomes such as attitudes towards harsh discipline, gender attitudes, power-sharing, positive parenting practices, etc.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of Coaching Models to Promote Implementation of an Evidence-based Parenting Program
NCT01791777
Impact of Family-Centered Care for Intimate Partner Violence (IPV)
NCT06071299
Evaluation of Parenting Interventions to Decrease Family Risk for Child Maltreatment
NCT00586677
Effectiveness of a Multi-Component Evidence-Based Parent Training Program in Reducing Child Maltreatment
NCT00595010
Comparing a Fatherhood Focused Individual Intervention to Batterer Intervention to Reduce IPV and Child Maltreatment
NCT04165291
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Safe at Home Cycle 1
The experimental arm will receive the Safe at Home program which is a community-based discussion group series aiming to prevent and respond to intimate partner violence and child maltreatment in conflict-affected communities. It includes once weekly, single-sex discussion groups with coupled men and women and once monthly family discussion groups with couples and children. During the weekly sessions men and women reflect critically and engage in dialogue related to gender, power, and privilege, learn about the causes and consequence of violence against women and children and gain skills in stress management, psychosocial support and positive parenting strategies. Family sessions focus on improving relationship quality and shared decision-making among partners and participation of children in family decision-making.
Safe at Home
Discussion-based intervention
Safe at Home Cycle 2
During the period of the study, this group will not receive an intervention. Rather, this arm will receive the Safe at Home program after endline data collection is completed for a waitlisted group.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Safe at Home
Discussion-based intervention
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* registered for the Safe at Home program
* living with intimate partner who is also registered for the program and at least one child aged 6-12
* speaker of Swahili, Kinyarwanda, or French
Exclusion Criteria
* being of a polygamous household
* not registered for program
* obvious mental, or cognitive, or communication difficulties.
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
International Rescue Committee
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Kathryn Falb
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
International Rescue Committee
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
International Rescue Committee
New York, New York, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Falb KL, Asghar K, Blackwell A, Baseme S, Nyanguba M, Roth D, Hategekimana JD. Improving family functioning and reducing violence in the home in North Kivu, Democratic Republic of Congo: a pilot cluster-randomised controlled trial of Safe at Home. BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 6;13(3):e065759. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065759.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Safe at Home
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.