Evaluation of a Trauma-Informed Partner Violence Intervention Program

NCT ID: NCT06803043

Last Updated: 2025-05-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

800 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-02-13

Study Completion Date

2028-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this study is to conduct a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing outcomes between two programs to reduce intimate partner violence (IPV)- the Strength at Home (SAH) program and a standard, state-approved IPV intervention program, Treatment as Usual (TAU). Primary outcomes will include self- and partner-reported physical and psychological IPV. Secondary outcomes will include self-reported PTSD symptoms, alexithymia, alcohol use problems, and treatment satisfaction, assessed across five time points.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A mixed-methods approach will be used for this single site, parallel group RCT. All participants will be randomized at the individual level to Strength at Home (SAH) or Treatment as Usual (TAU), with a 1:1 allocation ratio. Assessments will occur pre-treatment and post-treatment with follow-up assessments scheduled every three months post-treatment through month 12. Assessments have been designed to examine reductions in IPV and other outcomes including posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms and alcohol use.

The primary hypotheses are that those receiving SAH will evidence greater reductions in physical and psychological IPV, symptoms of PTSD, alexithymia, and alcohol use problems, and higher treatment satisfaction relative to those receiving TAU across the time points.

The specific aims and sub aims are:

1. Test the comparative effectiveness of SAH and TAU by conducting an RCT comparing 200 justice-involved men randomly assigned to each program.

* Compare the frequency of physical and psychological IPV, the primary outcomes of interest, across conditions as reported by the male participants and their intimate partners across Time 1 (baseline) and four 3-month follow ups (Times 2-5). Additionally, at Time 5, the study may make use of available arrest record data from the state of Rhode Island.
* Compare symptoms of PTSD, alexithymia, and alcohol use problems across conditions and assessment time points as reported by the male participants.
* Compare treatment satisfaction across conditions as reported by the male participants across the four 3-month follow ups (Times 2-5).
2. Facilitate future use of SAH by working closely with the Stakeholder Advisory Board to identify potential barriers and facilitators to successful implementation in civilian community settings.

* Identify barriers and facilitators to implementation.
* Assess the acceptability of SAH among stakeholders in the community setting and areas in need of refinement.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Domestic Violence Post Traumatic Stress Disorder

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

A mixed-methods approach will be used for this single site, parallel group RCT. Participants will be randomized at the individual level to Strength at Home (SAH) or Treatment as Usual (TAU), with a 1:1 allocation ratio.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Strength at Home (SAH)

SAH isa trauma-informed 12-week intimate partner violence (IPV) intervention program.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

SAH

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

SAH is a group trauma informed intervention that uses motivational strategies and self-monitoring of one's thoughts and responses. It provides a unique fusion of interventions for trauma and IPV and consists of 12 two-hour weekly sessions. Throughout the program, group members complete in-session practice exercises and are provided "practice assignments" to consolidate and apply information learned in group.

Treatment as Usual (TAU)

TAU is a 20-week state-approved IPV intervention program.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

TAU

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

TAU is a court mandated 20 week, psychoeducational/directed program that emphasizes the sharing of power and control in relationships and personal accountability. Topics also focus on equality wheels, substance abuse impacts, culture and socialization impact on gender roles, defense mechanisms versus coping skills, triggers for stress and anger, and healthy versus unhealthy communication.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

SAH

SAH is a group trauma informed intervention that uses motivational strategies and self-monitoring of one's thoughts and responses. It provides a unique fusion of interventions for trauma and IPV and consists of 12 two-hour weekly sessions. Throughout the program, group members complete in-session practice exercises and are provided "practice assignments" to consolidate and apply information learned in group.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

TAU

TAU is a court mandated 20 week, psychoeducational/directed program that emphasizes the sharing of power and control in relationships and personal accountability. Topics also focus on equality wheels, substance abuse impacts, culture and socialization impact on gender roles, defense mechanisms versus coping skills, triggers for stress and anger, and healthy versus unhealthy communication.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Men court-mandated to IPV intervention from the Rhode Island Department of Parole and Probation and their partners

Exclusion Criteria

* None
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Rhode Island Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Boston University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Casey T Taft, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

CABU School Medicine, Psychiatry

Lindsay Orchowski, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Rhode Island Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CABU School of Medicine, Psychiatry

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Rhode Island Hospital

Providence, Rhode Island, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

BPS-2023C1-31039

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

H-45014

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.