Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
53 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-03-31
2016-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Strength for U in Relationship Empowerment
NCT04218864
Prevention of Childhood Maltreatment in Families With Young Children
NCT04341376
Can Safety Planning Improve Perinatal Outcomes Among Pregnant Women Exposed to Intimate Partner Violence?
NCT00831831
Enhanced Nurse Home Visitation to Prevent Intimate Partner Violence
NCT01811719
Intervention for IPV-exposed Pregnant Women
NCT04068662
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This study is the first step towards developing a computer-based brief intervention ("Reach Out for a Safe Environment") that targets intimate partner violence in perinatal women in mental health treatment and constitutes the developmental aims of a larger study. The aims were to perform a small open trial (n = 8) of the Reach Out for a Safe Environment (ROSE) intervention to assess feasibility of recruitment of target population and acceptability of intervention and study procedures. Also, to conduct a randomized controlled pilot study in a sample of 50 perinatal women seeking mental health treatment who screen positive for recent IPV to demonstrate the acceptability and feasibility of the ROSE intervention via participant report of ease of use, helpfulness, and overall satisfaction.
We collected several measures on the feasibility of the research design, the acceptability of ROSE, and on intervention effects for IPV severity and level of self-care strategies (primary outcomes), motivation and self efficacy (secondary outcomes), and use of recommended mental health treatment services (tertiary outcome). This phase used a two-group, randomized, controlled design with an initial session for both conditions plus booster session one month later for the intervention condition. The initial intervention session was conducted close to an intake visit for mental health difficulties, with a booster session within one month following baseline. There was a 3-month follow up assessment. Assessments and the booster session were conducted in a private room or at a location that was a convenient location for the woman and one that provided a confidential, safe, and comfortable environment for the participant.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
ROSE Program
Participants received a 35-40-minute intervention on the Tablet PC and an in-person 10-15-minute booster session conducted by interventionists within a month after the intervention. Participants in this condition completed a baseline assessment as well as a follow-up assessment 3 months later.
ROSE Program
The ROSE Program was specifically tailored, innovative and relevant to diverse, racial and ethnic perinatal women in a number of ways including the images and content used in the intervention and coordinating study appointments with treatment visits. It was tailored to the current IPV risk assessment, pregnancy or postpartum status of each participant, was designed to reach participants across levels of motivation for change. The content of ROSE was theory-driven, consistent with the Motivational Interviewing model of behavior, and consistent with the literature on effective interventions that address IPV.
Control Condition
Control Condition consisted of a series of questions regarding television show preferences and then viewed a brief series of videos of popular entertainers/shows, with subsequent requests for ratings of subjective preference. Participants in this condition completed a baseline assessment as well as a follow-up assessment 3 months later.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
ROSE Program
The ROSE Program was specifically tailored, innovative and relevant to diverse, racial and ethnic perinatal women in a number of ways including the images and content used in the intervention and coordinating study appointments with treatment visits. It was tailored to the current IPV risk assessment, pregnancy or postpartum status of each participant, was designed to reach participants across levels of motivation for change. The content of ROSE was theory-driven, consistent with the Motivational Interviewing model of behavior, and consistent with the literature on effective interventions that address IPV.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age 18 or older
* Seeking mental health treatment at The Center for Women's Behavioral Health (WBH) at Women and Infants Hospital (WIH)
* Endorsed any IPV during the past 12 months as measured by the Woman Abuse Screening Tool (WAST)
Exclusion Criteria
* Inability to understand English (understand the consent form when read aloud and assessments that are narrated by computer)
18 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
NIH
Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Caron Zlotnick
Director of Behavioral Medicine Research
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Caron Zlotnick, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Women and Infants' Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Center for Women's Behavioral Health at Women and Infants' Hospital
Providence, Rhode Island, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hameed M, O'Doherty L, Gilchrist G, Tirado-Munoz J, Taft A, Chondros P, Feder G, Tan M, Hegarty K. Psychological therapies for women who experience intimate partner violence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 1;7(7):CD013017. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013017.pub2.
Zlotnick C, Tzilos Wernette G, Raker CA. A randomized controlled trial of a computer-based brief intervention for victimized perinatal women seeking mental health treatment. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2019 Jun;22(3):315-325. doi: 10.1007/s00737-018-0895-1. Epub 2018 Aug 7.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
14-0056
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.