Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
1880 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2008-05-31
2015-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Age 12 Follow-up of Early Preventive Intervention (Memphis)
NCT00438165
Follow-up Evaluation of Home Nurse Visitation Program for Socially Disadvantaged Women and Their Children
NCT00443586
Intervention for IPV-exposed Pregnant Women
NCT04068662
Brief Intervention in At-Risk First-time Mothers
NCT00230009
Age 9 Follow-up of Preventive Intervention (Denver)
NCT00438594
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Hypotheses for Primary Grant
We specified hypotheses based upon the pattern of results found through child age 12, and separated them into primary and secondary hypotheses. Following the original formulation of hypotheses, we edited them to take into account results from the earlier Elmira trial10 that were analyzed following the submission of the proposal for the current phase of follow-up in Memphis. We had originally hypothesized that program effects would be more pronounced for mothers and children living in the most disadvantaged neighborhoods in Memphis, but realized as these data were being gathered that virtually all of the participants in the Memphis trial lived in neighborhoods that were so disadvantaged that there was little meaningful variation among neighborhoods, and therefore removed this aspect of our hypotheses. We also found that it was impossible to consistently gather information from children's school records on outcomes like conduct grades from hundreds of schools, so substituted high school graduation as a secondary outcome. These refined hypotheses were specified prior to the completion of data gathering and any analysis of treatment-control differences. We specify the original hypotheses and then indicate the revised hypotheses for maternal and child outcomes. Compared to control-group counterparts:
Original Maternal Outcomes Hypotheses
1. (Primary) The program will continue to improve maternal life-course (fewer short inter-birth intervals, less use of welfare, more stable partner relations), especially for mothers with higher psychological resources.
2. (Secondary) The program will reduce maternal substance use disorders (SUDs) and depression, effects that will be more pronounced for a) mothers with low psychological resources, and b) those living in the most disadvantaged neighborhoods at registration.
Revised Maternal Outcome Hypotheses
1. (Primary) The program will continue to improve maternal life-course (reflected in total costs of welfare - SNAP, TANF, Medicaid), especially for mothers with higher psychological resources.
2. (Secondary) The program will reduce maternal substance use disorders (SUDs) and depression.
Original Child Outcomes Hypotheses
3. (Primary) The program will improve the health and development of firstborn children who will exhibit: a) superior cognitive, language, and academic functioning, and executive cognitive functioning (ECF); b) less depression and anxiety; c) fewer failed conduct grades and school disciplinary actions, d) less violent behavior and gang membership, and fewer arrests, juvenile detentions, and convictions - especially for crimes involving interpersonal violence.
4. (Primary) The program will reduce youth risk for HIV infection, including a) use of substances and SUDs; b) risky sexual behaviors; c) sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and d) pregnancies.
5. (Primary) Program effects on youth will be more pronounced for a) males, b) those born to low-resource mothers, and c) those living in the most disadvantaged neighborhoods at registration.
Revised Child Outcome Hypotheses 3. (Primary) The program will improve the health and development of firstborn children who will exhibit: a) superior cognitive, language, and academic functioning; b) less depression and anxiety; d) less gang membership, and fewer arrests, convictions, and self-reported antisocial behavior - especially for crimes involving interpersonal violence.
4\. (Primary) The program will reduce youth risk for HIV infection, pregnancies, births, use of substances, and SUDs.
5\. (Secondary) The program will improve firstborn children's executive cognitive functioning (ECF); and rates of high school graduation.
6\. (Primary) Program effects on cognitive, language, and academic functioning, and executive cognitive functioning will be more pronounced among those born to low-resource mothers and on arrests and convictions among females.
Maternal and Child Outcomes (Not Revised) 7. (Secondary) Program effects on mothers and youth, in preliminary analyses, will be more pronounced for those with genetic vulnerabilities:
1. Effects on youth depression and anxiety will be greater for those with low-activity genotypes (S/S, LG/LG, S/LG) of the serotonin transporter gene (SLC6A4) promoter polymorphism, 5-HTTLPR, compared to those with high-activity genotypes (LA/LA); effects on these outcomes will be of intermediate magnitude for those with intermediate activity-level genotypes (S/LA, LA/LG).
2. Effects on youth violent antisocial behavior, SUDs, and risky sexual behavior will be more pronounced among males with the MAOA-LPR low activity alleles compared to males with MAOA-LPR high activity alleles, and among both males and females with 2 copies of the high-activity Val allele of the COMT Val158Met polymorphism compared to those with 2 copies of the low-activity met allele or heterozygotes.
3. Effects on maternal SUDs will be concentrated among mothers with 2 copies of the Val158 alleles.
4. Effects on child outcomes will be more pronounced among youth born to mothers with either 1) the S/S, S/LG and "LG/LG" (low-activity) genotypes of 5-HTTLPR (conferring susceptibility for depression under adversity) or 2) 2 copies of the high activity COMT Val158 allele (conferring susceptibility to compromised ECF and SUDs under conditions of adversity).
8\. (Secondary) Program effects on adolescent functioning will be explained by its improvement in prenatal health, early care of the child, maternal life-course, and earlier child academic and behavioral functioning.
Examination of Intervention Effects on Subsequent Children With an administrative supplement, we addressed the following questions focused on subsequent children born within 5 years of the first child. Note that these questions were framed with no specific hypotheses about the degree to which particular subgroups would benefit from the intervention, given that intervention impact on pregnancy planning had been most pronounced on women with higher psychological resources.
1. To what degree does this program improve the health and development of subsequent children in terms of their a) language, academic, and executive cognitive functioning (ECF); b) depression and anxiety; c) failed conduct grades, d) violent behavior and gang membership, and e) arrests, juvenile detentions, and convictions, especially for violent crimes?
2. To what degree does this program reduce subsequent children's risk for HIV infection, including a) use and abuse of substances; b) risky sexual behaviors; c) sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and d) pregnancies?
3. To what degree are the program effects on subsequent children more pronounced for a) males, b) those born to high-resource mothers, and c) those living in the most disadvantaged neighborhoods at registration?
4. To what degree are program effects on subsequent children's functioning explained by its earlier impact on a) the timing and rates of subsequent births; b) families' use of welfare-related services; c) stability in partner relationships; d) improvements in neighborhood contexts; and e) antisocial behavior among the first-borns?
Aims of the Benefit-Cost Analysis
With an administrative supplement, we conducted a benefit-cost analysis of NFP in Memphis. The benefit-cost study was designed to:
1. Estimate return on investment in Memphis NFP from the perspectives of government, society and individual participants.
2. Estimate the quality-adjusted life year (QALY) savings produced by the Memphis NFP.
3. Combine effectiveness estimates from Memphis NFP with those from other NFP evaluations and produce a combined estimate.
4. Develop a model that states can use to estimate the value of funding NFP programs.
5. Compare the cost-effectiveness of the NFP to other commonly delivered childhood interventions.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Treatment 2: Transportation, Child Screening/Referral
The 514 families received: 1) free transportation for prenatal care; and 2) child developmental screening and referral services.
No interventions assigned to this group
Treatment 4: Nurse Home Visiting through Age 2
The 228 families: 1) free transportation for prenatal care; 2) nurse home-visiting during pregnancy and through child's second birthday; and 3) child developmental screening and referral.
Nurse Home Visiting
Visits from nurses from mid-pregnancy to child age 2 years.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Nurse Home Visiting
Visits from nurses from mid-pregnancy to child age 2 years.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
17 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Rochester
OTHER
Emory University
OTHER
University of Colorado, Boulder
OTHER
RTI International
OTHER
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
NIH
Yale University
OTHER
University of Colorado, Denver
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
David L Olds, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Colorado, Denver
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Memphis Study Office
Memphis, Tennessee, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kitzman H, Olds DL, Henderson CR Jr, Hanks C, Cole R, Tatelbaum R, McConnochie KM, Sidora K, Luckey DW, Shaver D, Engelhardt K, James D, Barnard K. Effect of prenatal and infancy home visitation by nurses on pregnancy outcomes, childhood injuries, and repeated childbearing. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1997 Aug 27;278(8):644-52.
Kitzman H, Olds DL, Sidora K, Henderson CR Jr, Hanks C, Cole R, Luckey DW, Bondy J, Cole K, Glazner J. Enduring effects of nurse home visitation on maternal life course: a 3-year follow-up of a randomized trial. JAMA. 2000 Apr 19;283(15):1983-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.15.1983.
Olds DL, Kitzman H, Cole R, Robinson J, Sidora K, Luckey DW, Henderson CR Jr, Hanks C, Bondy J, Holmberg J. Effects of nurse home-visiting on maternal life course and child development: age 6 follow-up results of a randomized trial. Pediatrics. 2004 Dec;114(6):1550-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0962.
Olds DL, Kitzman H, Hanks C, Cole R, Anson E, Sidora-Arcoleo K, Luckey DW, Henderson CR Jr, Holmberg J, Tutt RA, Stevenson AJ, Bondy J. Effects of nurse home visiting on maternal and child functioning: age-9 follow-up of a randomized trial. Pediatrics. 2007 Oct;120(4):e832-45. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-2111.
Olds DL, Kitzman HJ, Cole RE, Hanks CA, Arcoleo KJ, Anson EA, Luckey DW, Knudtson MD, Henderson CR Jr, Bondy J, Stevenson AJ. Enduring effects of prenatal and infancy home visiting by nurses on maternal life course and government spending: follow-up of a randomized trial among children at age 12 years. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2010 May;164(5):419-24. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2010.49.
Kitzman HJ, Olds DL, Cole RE, Hanks CA, Anson EA, Arcoleo KJ, Luckey DW, Knudtson MD, Henderson CR Jr, Holmberg JR. Enduring effects of prenatal and infancy home visiting by nurses on children: follow-up of a randomized trial among children at age 12 years. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2010 May;164(5):412-8. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2010.76.
Olds DL, Kitzman H, Knudtson MD, Anson E, Smith JA, Cole R. Effect of home visiting by nurses on maternal and child mortality: results of a 2-decade follow-up of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2014 Sep;168(9):800-6. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.472.
Conti G, Smith J, Anson E, Groth S, Knudtson M, Salvati A, Olds D. Early Home Visits and Health Outcomes in Low-Income Mothers and Offspring: 18-Year Follow-Up of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jan 2;7(1):e2351752. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.51752.
Kitzman H, Olds DL, Knudtson MD, Cole R, Anson E, Smith JA, Fishbein D, DiClemente R, Wingood G, Caliendo AM, Hopfer C, Miller T, Conti G. Prenatal and Infancy Nurse Home Visiting and 18-Year Outcomes of a Randomized Trial. Pediatrics. 2019 Dec;144(6):e20183876. doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-3876. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
Olds DL, Kitzman H, Anson E, Smith JA, Knudtson MD, Miller T, Cole R, Hopfer C, Conti G. Prenatal and Infancy Nurse Home Visiting Effects on Mothers: 18-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Trial. Pediatrics. 2019 Dec;144(6):e20183889. doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-3889. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
Enoch MA, Kitzman H, Smith JA, Anson E, Hodgkinson CA, Goldman D, Olds DL. A Prospective Cohort Study of Influences on Externalizing Behaviors Across Childhood: Results From a Nurse Home Visiting Randomized Controlled Trial. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2016 May;55(5):376-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2016.02.007. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Related Info
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
08-0616
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.