Effectiveness Trial for Project SafeCare for Child Neglect
NCT ID: NCT01391754
Last Updated: 2011-07-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
2175 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2003-10-31
2007-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effectiveness of a Multi-Component Evidence-Based Parent Training Program in Reducing Child Maltreatment
NCT00595010
Comparative Effectiveness Trail to Reduce Child Maltreatment, Improve Client Outcomes and Examine Client Burden
NCT02549287
University of Oklahoma Parenting Program Attrition
NCT00153465
Pilot Test of Innovative Child Maltreatment (CM) Prevention Strategy
NCT06912685
Positive Parenting Program in Foster Care
NCT03910491
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
FACTORIAL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
SafeCare with Coached Implementation
Home-based services with the SafeCare model, implemented with in vivo provider coaching as quality control
SafeCare
Behavioral home based family preservation. Weekly visits X six months.
In vivo coached quality control
Live observation of practice with expert coaching, feedback and fidelity monitoring
SafeCare without Coaching
Home-based services using the SafeCare model, implemented without in vivo coached implementation quality control
SafeCare
Behavioral home based family preservation. Weekly visits X six months.
Uncoached
No in vivo coached quality control or fidelity monitoring
Services As Usual with Coaching
Usual home based services, with in vivo coached implementation quality control
In vivo coached quality control
Live observation of practice with expert coaching, feedback and fidelity monitoring
Services As Usual
Home based services not using the SafeCare model
Services As Usual Without Coaching
Usual home based services without in vivo coached quality control
Services As Usual
Home based services not using the SafeCare model
Uncoached
No in vivo coached quality control or fidelity monitoring
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
SafeCare
Behavioral home based family preservation. Weekly visits X six months.
In vivo coached quality control
Live observation of practice with expert coaching, feedback and fidelity monitoring
Services As Usual
Home based services not using the SafeCare model
Uncoached
No in vivo coached quality control or fidelity monitoring
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
14 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
NIH
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
FED
Oklahoma Department of Health and Human Services
UNKNOWN
University of Oklahoma
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mark Chaffin, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Oklahoma
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Eastern Oklahoma Youth Services
McAlester, Oklahoma, United States
NorthCare
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
Family and Children's Services
Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Aarons GA, Sommerfeld DH, Hecht DB, Silovsky JF, Chaffin MJ. The impact of evidence-based practice implementation and fidelity monitoring on staff turnover: evidence for a protective effect. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2009 Apr;77(2):270-80. doi: 10.1037/a0013223.
Chaffin M, Bard D. Changes in parental depression symptoms during family preservation services. Child Abuse Negl. 2011 Jun;35(6):448-58. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2011.02.005. Epub 2011 Jun 1.
Chaffin M, Bard D, Hecht D, Silovsky J. Change trajectories during home-based services with chronic child welfare cases. Child Maltreat. 2011 May;16(2):114-25. doi: 10.1177/1077559511402048. Epub 2011 Apr 13.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.