Evaluating the Effectiveness of Keeping Safe - a School Based Intervention Aimed at Preventing Abuse
NCT ID: NCT02961010
Last Updated: 2019-06-27
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
6300 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-06-30
2018-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
* Comprises three themes (1) Healthy Relationships; (2) My Body; and (3) Being Safe and includes content across the following keeping safe concepts; bullying, neglect, emotional, physical, domestic and sexual abuse, in online and offline contexts.
* Includes activities for the formal and informal school curricula - 63 lessons will be taught to children by their classroom teacher; 3 per term, 9 per year across 7 years from Primary 1 to primary 7 (age 4-11 years).
* Each lesson is accompanied by directed homework activities to involve and engage parents and enable them reinforce learning at home. A number of whole school, key stage and year group assemblies have also been prepared.
* At the beginning of each term school leaders will deliver a prepared assembly to introduce the theme for the term. Following this assembly each teacher will deliver 3 lessons tailored to the age group of their class and parents will assist with home works. The lessons use eBooks, character animations, stories, rhymes, and interactive whiteboard activities to engage children in their learning.
The intervention adopts a whole-school approach and seeks to build the capacity and skills of teachers and parents as key partners. Teachers will receive a comprehensive package of training, ongoing support and resource materials to equip them with the skills they need to effectively communicate sensitive keeping safe messages. Parents will also receive a package of resources to help them feel confident about communicating sensitive messages to their children.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of Parenting Interventions to Decrease Family Risk for Child Maltreatment
NCT00586677
Safe Touches: A Rigorous Evaluation of a Sexual Abuse Prevention Program for Children
NCT02181647
Effectiveness of a Multi-Component Evidence-Based Parent Training Program in Reducing Child Maltreatment
NCT00595010
Tertiary Prevention of Child Sexual Abuse
NCT06126926
Prevention of Violent Behavior Among Children
NCT00056940
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This study uses a cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) design to evaluate the effectiveness of Keeping Safe, a whole school preventative education intervention in improving children's knowledge and understanding to keep safe in situations of abuse including sexual and domestic abuse.
Randomisation will take place at school level. Schools will be allocated either to the intervention group or a waitlist control group. Following randomisation, intervention schools will receive the package of training and support across a 3 month period. This comprises a blended package of continuing professional development training and support for teachers and school staff to enable them teach sensitive preventative education concepts through the formal statutory Personal Development curriculum, and all other informal opportunities that present in the daily life of the school. Intervention schools will then implement the Keeping Safe intervention in their school for 2 school years, between 2016 and 2018.
The Wait List Control group will continue with standard practice, teaching the Personal Development curriculum between 2016 and 2018. Both groups will participate in the evaluation between March 2016 and July 2018 and the wait list control group will receive the programme in Sept 2018.
This RCT will collect data at 3 timepoints: Baseline (March/ June 2016), Time One (May -June 2017) and Time Two (May- June 2018). Outcome data on children's knowledge and understanding will be collected at all 3 time points as will data on (1) teacher confidence and teaching practice, (2) parent confidence and practice, (3) school level administrative data (e.g. incidence of disclosure and referral out) and (4) school climate/organizational culture.
Primary outcomes (childrens)
1. If exposure to the Keeping Safe programme:
1. Impacts/changes children's self-reported knowledge and understanding of the following keeping safe concepts; bullying, neglect, physical, emotional, domestic and sexual abuse and in what ways?
2. Impacts/changes children's self-reported self-efficacy to keep safe in situations of bullying, neglect, physical, emotional, domestic and sexual abuse and in what ways?
2. If children's self-reported knowledge and understanding in relation to the above keeping safe concepts changes over the 2 year period that the programme is being implemented and in what ways?
3. If changes in children's knowledge and understanding vary for different groups of children, and in what ways?
Secondary Outcomes (teachers and parents)
1. If engagement with the Keeping Safe programme:
1. Impacts/changes teachers' self-reported knowledge in teaching keeping safe messages and in what ways?
2. Impacts/changes teachers' self-reported confidence and comfort in their own skills to manage sensitive issues in relation to Keeping Safe in the classroom and in what ways?
2. How school context factors such as size, sector and management type, and professional experience factors (length of teaching service, nature of role in school) impact on teacher knowledge, comfort and confidence in teaching Keeping Safe messages.
3. If the continuing professional development training and resources specifically designed for the Keeping Safe programme impact on teachers' teacher knowledge, comfort and confidence in teaching keeping safe messages.
4. If implementing the Keeping Safe programme leads to change in school ethos/climate, and if this differs across schools and in what ways?
5. If engagement with the Keeping Safe programme (parent resources and directed homework activities):
1. Impacts/changes parents' self-reported knowledge of and confidence to communicate with their child about keeping safe messages and in what ways?
2. Impacts/changes parents' self-reported current and future confidence to communicate with their child about keeping safe messages and in what ways?
6. If reported changes in parents' knowledge and confidence vary for different groups of parents and in what ways?
7. How personal (gender) parenting profile (age of children, no of children, relationship to child) and home context (postcode and household income) factors impact on parents' knowledge and confidence in relation to keeping safe messages.
8. How parents' knowledge and confidence change over the 2 year period that the programme is being implemented and in what ways?
Data will be collected from children using a questionnaire designed to assess their knowledge and understanding of a range of keeping safe concepts and their self-reported self-efficacy to keep safe in unsafe situations. The questionnaire is a composite measure comprising existing and adapted standardised measures across a range of keeping safe concepts.
The content and administration of the questionnaire (online and paper versions available) have been tailored to ensure age and developmental appropriateness (a number of different versions will be used with varying age groups).
All classroom teachers will be invited to complete a self-report questionnaire (online or paper versions available) measuring their confidence, comfort and teaching practices with regards the programme. Fidelity data with regard to completion of continuing professional learning will be collated from the analytics function on the e-learning programme. Self-reported fidelity to programme implementation in the classroom will be collated using a fidelity monitoring form.
Information on school context (size, sector, management type) and professional experience (length of teaching service, nature of role in school) will also be collected to identify if these impact on teacher knowledge and confidence in teaching keeping safe messages.
All parents will be invited to complete a self-report questionnaire (online and paper) to assess their knowledge and confidence to talk to their children about sensitive keeping safe messages.
Information will also be collected on parents' personal profile (gender) parenting profile (age of children, no of children, relationship to child) home context (Postcode and household income) to identify if these make a difference to parent knowledge and confidence in communicating with their child(ren) about keeping safe messages
Additional school-level administrative data will be collected on Free School Meals/ newcomer children, level of Social Service engagement with school (referrals out etc) to see if these types of experience impact on teacher knowledge and confidence in teaching keeping safe messages, and to examine any difference between intervention and wait-list control schools.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention Group
The intervention group will receive the Keeping Safe programme between 2016 and 2018. This comprises a blended package of continuing professional development training and support (plus resource materials) for teachers and school staff to enable them teach sensitive preventative education concepts through the formal statutory Personal Development curriculum, and all other informal opportunities that present in the daily life of the school. Following randomisation, intervention schools will receive the package of training and support across a 3 month period and will then implement/teach in their school across 2 school years. The intervention group will collect outcome data for the evaluation between March 2016 and June 2018.
Keeping Safe
A whole school Preventative Education programme
Wait-list Control Group
The Wait List Control group will continue with standard practice of teaching the statutory Personal Development curriculum between 2016 and 2018. They will not receive the Keeping Safe intervention until Sept 2018 following completion of the evaluation. The Waitlist control intervention group will collect outcome data for the evaluation between March 2016 and June 2018.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Keeping Safe
A whole school Preventative Education programme
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
2. children 4-11 years attending mainstream sector primary school in Northern Ireland whose school has not been invited/ rejected the invitation to take part in the RCT
3. children 4-11 years attending mainstream sector primary school in Northern Ireland whose school has accepted the invitation to take part in the RCT and whose parents have not provided consent for their participation.
4 Years
12 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Department of Education Northern Ireland
UNKNOWN
National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Aisling M McElearney, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
National Society for the Prevention fo Cruelty to Children
Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Dake JA, Price JH, Murnan J. Evaluation of a child abuse prevention curriculum for third-grade students: assessment of knowledge and efficacy expectations. J Sch Health. 2003 Feb;73(2):76-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2003.tb03576.x.
Sudermann M, Marshall L. and Loosely S. Evaluation of the London (Ontario) community group treatment programme for children who have witnessed woman abuse. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment and Trauma 3(1): 127-146, 2000.
Tutty L. The revised Children's Knowledge of Abuse Questionnaire: development of a measure of children's understanding of sexual abuse prevention concepts. Social Work Research 19(2): 112-120, 1995.
Lynagh M.Gilligan G. and Handley T. Teaching about, and dealing with, sensitive issues in schools: How confident are pre-service teachers? Asia-Pacific Journal of Health, Sport and Physical Education 1 (3/4) 2010
Olweus D. The revised Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire for Students. Bergen, Norway: University of Bergen.1996
Cohen JN. Byers SE. and Sears HA. Factors Affecting Canadian Teachers' Willingness to Teach Sexual Health Education. Sex Education: Sexuality, Society and Learning, 12 (3): 299-316, 2012.
Kantor GK, Holt MK, Mebert CJ, Straus MA, Drach KM, Ricci LR, MacAllum CA, Brown W. Development and preliminary psychometric properties of the multidimensional neglectful behavior scale-child report. Child Maltreat. 2004 Nov;9(4):409-28. doi: 10.1177/1077559504269530.
Aldridge JM. Laugksch RC and Fraser BJ School -level environment and outcomes - based education in South Africa. Learning Environment Research 9: 123-147. 2006
Walsh K, Brandon L, Chirio L. Mother-child communication about sexual abuse prevention. J Child Sex Abus. 2012;21(4):399-421. doi: 10.1080/10538712.2012.675424.
Saslawsky DA, Wurtele SK. Educating children about sexual abuse: implications for pediatric intervention and possible prevention. J Pediatr Psychol. 1986 Jun;11(2):235-45. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/11.2.235. No abstract available.
Morawska A, Walsh A, Grabski M, Fletcher R. Parental confidence and preferences for communicating with their child about sexuality. Sex Education 15(3): 235-48, 2015.
McElearney A, Scott J, Adamson G, Turtle K, McBride O, Stephenson P. Keeping safe: establishing the need to teach 'keeping safe' messages in primary schools in Northern Ireland: what do children currently know and understand? London: NSPCC, 2011.
Stephenson P, McElearney A, Stead J. The development of effective preventative education in primary schools in Northern Ireland: summary report. London: NSPCC, 2011.
McElearney A, Stephenson P, Adamson G. The development of effective preventative education in primary schools in Northern Ireland: exploring practice, policy and research implications. London: NSPCC, 2011.
McElearney A, Scott J, Stephenson P, Tracey A, Corry D. The views of principals, teachers and other school staff in relation to teaching "keeping safe" messages in primary schools in Northern Ireland. London: NSPCC, 2011.
Stephenson P, Tracey A, McElearney A. The views of cross-sector stakeholders in relation to teaching "keeping safe" messages in primary schools in Northern Ireland. London: NSPCC, 2011.
McElearney A, Brennan-Wilson A, Murphy C, Stephenson P, Bunting B. Cluster randomised controlled trial of 'whole school' child maltreatment prevention programme in primary schools in Northern Ireland: study protocol for Keeping Safe. BMC Public Health. 2018 May 3;18(1):590. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5492-8.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Click here for more information about this study: Preventative 'Keeping Safe' Education in Northern Ireland
Department of Education website
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NIKS001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.