Evaluating the Effectiveness of Keeping Safe - a School Based Intervention Aimed at Preventing Abuse

NCT ID: NCT02961010

Last Updated: 2019-06-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

6300 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-06-30

Study Completion Date

2018-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study evaluates the effectiveness of Keeping Safe, a whole school preventative education intervention in improving children's knowledge and understanding to keep safe in situations of abuse. The intervention

* Comprises three themes (1) Healthy Relationships; (2) My Body; and (3) Being Safe and includes content across the following keeping safe concepts; bullying, neglect, emotional, physical, domestic and sexual abuse, in online and offline contexts.
* Includes activities for the formal and informal school curricula - 63 lessons will be taught to children by their classroom teacher; 3 per term, 9 per year across 7 years from Primary 1 to primary 7 (age 4-11 years).
* Each lesson is accompanied by directed homework activities to involve and engage parents and enable them reinforce learning at home. A number of whole school, key stage and year group assemblies have also been prepared.
* At the beginning of each term school leaders will deliver a prepared assembly to introduce the theme for the term. Following this assembly each teacher will deliver 3 lessons tailored to the age group of their class and parents will assist with home works. The lessons use eBooks, character animations, stories, rhymes, and interactive whiteboard activities to engage children in their learning.

The intervention adopts a whole-school approach and seeks to build the capacity and skills of teachers and parents as key partners. Teachers will receive a comprehensive package of training, ongoing support and resource materials to equip them with the skills they need to effectively communicate sensitive keeping safe messages. Parents will also receive a package of resources to help them feel confident about communicating sensitive messages to their children.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Exploratory research, funded by the Department of Education and undertaken by the NSPCC in 2008, investigated the need for preventative education that aimed to equip pupils with the skills to recognise and respond appropriately to bullying, child abuse and domestic abuse in primary schools in Northern Ireland. Subsequently, an intervention was designed based on the findings from stakeholder consultations (NSPCC reports, 2011) and existing research in the field of school based prevention.

This study uses a cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) design to evaluate the effectiveness of Keeping Safe, a whole school preventative education intervention in improving children's knowledge and understanding to keep safe in situations of abuse including sexual and domestic abuse.

Randomisation will take place at school level. Schools will be allocated either to the intervention group or a waitlist control group. Following randomisation, intervention schools will receive the package of training and support across a 3 month period. This comprises a blended package of continuing professional development training and support for teachers and school staff to enable them teach sensitive preventative education concepts through the formal statutory Personal Development curriculum, and all other informal opportunities that present in the daily life of the school. Intervention schools will then implement the Keeping Safe intervention in their school for 2 school years, between 2016 and 2018.

The Wait List Control group will continue with standard practice, teaching the Personal Development curriculum between 2016 and 2018. Both groups will participate in the evaluation between March 2016 and July 2018 and the wait list control group will receive the programme in Sept 2018.

This RCT will collect data at 3 timepoints: Baseline (March/ June 2016), Time One (May -June 2017) and Time Two (May- June 2018). Outcome data on children's knowledge and understanding will be collected at all 3 time points as will data on (1) teacher confidence and teaching practice, (2) parent confidence and practice, (3) school level administrative data (e.g. incidence of disclosure and referral out) and (4) school climate/organizational culture.

Primary outcomes (childrens)

1. If exposure to the Keeping Safe programme:

1. Impacts/changes children's self-reported knowledge and understanding of the following keeping safe concepts; bullying, neglect, physical, emotional, domestic and sexual abuse and in what ways?
2. Impacts/changes children's self-reported self-efficacy to keep safe in situations of bullying, neglect, physical, emotional, domestic and sexual abuse and in what ways?
2. If children's self-reported knowledge and understanding in relation to the above keeping safe concepts changes over the 2 year period that the programme is being implemented and in what ways?
3. If changes in children's knowledge and understanding vary for different groups of children, and in what ways?

Secondary Outcomes (teachers and parents)

1. If engagement with the Keeping Safe programme:

1. Impacts/changes teachers' self-reported knowledge in teaching keeping safe messages and in what ways?
2. Impacts/changes teachers' self-reported confidence and comfort in their own skills to manage sensitive issues in relation to Keeping Safe in the classroom and in what ways?
2. How school context factors such as size, sector and management type, and professional experience factors (length of teaching service, nature of role in school) impact on teacher knowledge, comfort and confidence in teaching Keeping Safe messages.
3. If the continuing professional development training and resources specifically designed for the Keeping Safe programme impact on teachers' teacher knowledge, comfort and confidence in teaching keeping safe messages.
4. If implementing the Keeping Safe programme leads to change in school ethos/climate, and if this differs across schools and in what ways?
5. If engagement with the Keeping Safe programme (parent resources and directed homework activities):

1. Impacts/changes parents' self-reported knowledge of and confidence to communicate with their child about keeping safe messages and in what ways?
2. Impacts/changes parents' self-reported current and future confidence to communicate with their child about keeping safe messages and in what ways?
6. If reported changes in parents' knowledge and confidence vary for different groups of parents and in what ways?
7. How personal (gender) parenting profile (age of children, no of children, relationship to child) and home context (postcode and household income) factors impact on parents' knowledge and confidence in relation to keeping safe messages.
8. How parents' knowledge and confidence change over the 2 year period that the programme is being implemented and in what ways?

Data will be collected from children using a questionnaire designed to assess their knowledge and understanding of a range of keeping safe concepts and their self-reported self-efficacy to keep safe in unsafe situations. The questionnaire is a composite measure comprising existing and adapted standardised measures across a range of keeping safe concepts.

The content and administration of the questionnaire (online and paper versions available) have been tailored to ensure age and developmental appropriateness (a number of different versions will be used with varying age groups).

All classroom teachers will be invited to complete a self-report questionnaire (online or paper versions available) measuring their confidence, comfort and teaching practices with regards the programme. Fidelity data with regard to completion of continuing professional learning will be collated from the analytics function on the e-learning programme. Self-reported fidelity to programme implementation in the classroom will be collated using a fidelity monitoring form.

Information on school context (size, sector, management type) and professional experience (length of teaching service, nature of role in school) will also be collected to identify if these impact on teacher knowledge and confidence in teaching keeping safe messages.

All parents will be invited to complete a self-report questionnaire (online and paper) to assess their knowledge and confidence to talk to their children about sensitive keeping safe messages.

Information will also be collected on parents' personal profile (gender) parenting profile (age of children, no of children, relationship to child) home context (Postcode and household income) to identify if these make a difference to parent knowledge and confidence in communicating with their child(ren) about keeping safe messages

Additional school-level administrative data will be collected on Free School Meals/ newcomer children, level of Social Service engagement with school (referrals out etc) to see if these types of experience impact on teacher knowledge and confidence in teaching keeping safe messages, and to examine any difference between intervention and wait-list control schools.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Child Maltreatment

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intervention Group

The intervention group will receive the Keeping Safe programme between 2016 and 2018. This comprises a blended package of continuing professional development training and support (plus resource materials) for teachers and school staff to enable them teach sensitive preventative education concepts through the formal statutory Personal Development curriculum, and all other informal opportunities that present in the daily life of the school. Following randomisation, intervention schools will receive the package of training and support across a 3 month period and will then implement/teach in their school across 2 school years. The intervention group will collect outcome data for the evaluation between March 2016 and June 2018.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Keeping Safe

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

A whole school Preventative Education programme

Wait-list Control Group

The Wait List Control group will continue with standard practice of teaching the statutory Personal Development curriculum between 2016 and 2018. They will not receive the Keeping Safe intervention until Sept 2018 following completion of the evaluation. The Waitlist control intervention group will collect outcome data for the evaluation between March 2016 and June 2018.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Keeping Safe

A whole school Preventative Education programme

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

(1) children 4-11 years attending mainstream sector primary school in Northern Ireland whose school has accepted the invitation to take part in the RCT and whose parents have provided consent for their participation.

Exclusion Criteria

1. children attending special sector primary schools in Northern Ireland.
2. children 4-11 years attending mainstream sector primary school in Northern Ireland whose school has not been invited/ rejected the invitation to take part in the RCT
3. children 4-11 years attending mainstream sector primary school in Northern Ireland whose school has accepted the invitation to take part in the RCT and whose parents have not provided consent for their participation.
Minimum Eligible Age

4 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

12 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Department of Education Northern Ireland

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Aisling M McElearney, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

National Society for the Prevention fo Cruelty to Children

Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Dake JA, Price JH, Murnan J. Evaluation of a child abuse prevention curriculum for third-grade students: assessment of knowledge and efficacy expectations. J Sch Health. 2003 Feb;73(2):76-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2003.tb03576.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12643023 (View on PubMed)

Sudermann M, Marshall L. and Loosely S. Evaluation of the London (Ontario) community group treatment programme for children who have witnessed woman abuse. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment and Trauma 3(1): 127-146, 2000.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Tutty L. The revised Children's Knowledge of Abuse Questionnaire: development of a measure of children's understanding of sexual abuse prevention concepts. Social Work Research 19(2): 112-120, 1995.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Lynagh M.Gilligan G. and Handley T. Teaching about, and dealing with, sensitive issues in schools: How confident are pre-service teachers? Asia-Pacific Journal of Health, Sport and Physical Education 1 (3/4) 2010

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Olweus D. The revised Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire for Students. Bergen, Norway: University of Bergen.1996

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Cohen JN. Byers SE. and Sears HA. Factors Affecting Canadian Teachers' Willingness to Teach Sexual Health Education. Sex Education: Sexuality, Society and Learning, 12 (3): 299-316, 2012.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Kantor GK, Holt MK, Mebert CJ, Straus MA, Drach KM, Ricci LR, MacAllum CA, Brown W. Development and preliminary psychometric properties of the multidimensional neglectful behavior scale-child report. Child Maltreat. 2004 Nov;9(4):409-28. doi: 10.1177/1077559504269530.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15538039 (View on PubMed)

Aldridge JM. Laugksch RC and Fraser BJ School -level environment and outcomes - based education in South Africa. Learning Environment Research 9: 123-147. 2006

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Walsh K, Brandon L, Chirio L. Mother-child communication about sexual abuse prevention. J Child Sex Abus. 2012;21(4):399-421. doi: 10.1080/10538712.2012.675424.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22809046 (View on PubMed)

Saslawsky DA, Wurtele SK. Educating children about sexual abuse: implications for pediatric intervention and possible prevention. J Pediatr Psychol. 1986 Jun;11(2):235-45. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/11.2.235. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 3723285 (View on PubMed)

Morawska A, Walsh A, Grabski M, Fletcher R. Parental confidence and preferences for communicating with their child about sexuality. Sex Education 15(3): 235-48, 2015.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

McElearney A, Scott J, Adamson G, Turtle K, McBride O, Stephenson P. Keeping safe: establishing the need to teach 'keeping safe' messages in primary schools in Northern Ireland: what do children currently know and understand? London: NSPCC, 2011.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Stephenson P, McElearney A, Stead J. The development of effective preventative education in primary schools in Northern Ireland: summary report. London: NSPCC, 2011.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

McElearney A, Stephenson P, Adamson G. The development of effective preventative education in primary schools in Northern Ireland: exploring practice, policy and research implications. London: NSPCC, 2011.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

McElearney A, Scott J, Stephenson P, Tracey A, Corry D. The views of principals, teachers and other school staff in relation to teaching "keeping safe" messages in primary schools in Northern Ireland. London: NSPCC, 2011.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Stephenson P, Tracey A, McElearney A. The views of cross-sector stakeholders in relation to teaching "keeping safe" messages in primary schools in Northern Ireland. London: NSPCC, 2011.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

McElearney A, Brennan-Wilson A, Murphy C, Stephenson P, Bunting B. Cluster randomised controlled trial of 'whole school' child maltreatment prevention programme in primary schools in Northern Ireland: study protocol for Keeping Safe. BMC Public Health. 2018 May 3;18(1):590. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5492-8.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29724196 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.nspcc.org.uk/keeping-safe-NI

Click here for more information about this study: Preventative 'Keeping Safe' Education in Northern Ireland

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NIKS001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Evaluation of HRP Among Pre-K Through 5th Grade
NCT06388850 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA