Effect of Intravenous Magnesium on Post-spinal Fentanyl Induced Pruritus Incidence
NCT ID: NCT04160598
Last Updated: 2020-09-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
144 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-09-02
2021-03-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Methods: ASA I-II Patient's candidate for orthopedic operations under spinal anesthesia (10-15mg hyperbaric bupivacaine and 25 µg fentanyl intrathecal) and will be divided randomly into two groups:
Control group (Placebo group): bolus 100 ml nacl 0.9% at end of surgery Study group (Mg ++ group): (continuous IV Magnesium 10mg/kg in 100 ml Nacl0.9% over 30 minutes at end of surgery).
Study outcome:
1. Hemodynamics: Systolic blood pressure, Mean arterial blood pressure, pulse rate, O2 saturation will be recorded in 5 min,10 min,30 min,60 min and every one hour till 6 hours after the operation.
2. Pruritus Patients were asked about existence (present=1,no=0), severity (mild=1, modret=2, sever =3) and site of pruritus (Face(trigeminal) =1, neuroaxial(dermatome)=2), 1,2,4, and 6 hours after operation. Incidence of pruritus total group incidence %.
3. The incidence of PONV.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Magnesium Sulphate Versus Fentanyl for Conscious Sedation in CSDH
NCT03548493
Magnesium Versus High Dose Fentanyl in Endotracheal Intubation
NCT04544163
Evaluation of Adding Magnesium Sulfate to (Fentanyl/Bupivacaine)Bi-mixture in Caudal Block
NCT06162806
Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine VS Magnesium Sulphate With Bupivacaine in Erector Spinae Block for Thoracotomy Pain
NCT05851768
Influence Of Low Dose Intrathecal Naloxone On Bupivacaine - Fentanyl Spinal Anaesthesia For Lower Limb Orthopedic Surgery In Elderly Patients
NCT04673812
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Methods This prospective randomized double blinded controlled study will be carried out in Mansoura faculty of medicine in Mansoura University hospital on cases subjected to LL orthopedic operations under spinal anesthesia utilizing bupivacaine plus adjuvant fentanyl which is documented to have high incidence of postspinal pruritus.
Patients: ASA I-II, of both genders, aged 20-70 years old Patient's candidate for LL orthopedic operations under spinal anesthesia. Total patient number of 144, will be enrolled into two groups 72 patients each, all patients will be anesthetized intrathecaly using10-15mg hyperbaric bupivacaine and 30 µg fentanyl and will be subdivided randomly into two groups:
Control group (Placebo Group): bolus 50 ml Nacl 0.9% at the end of surgery over 20 minutes 5ml/minute infusion rate.
Study group (MG++ Group): continuous IV infusion pump of Magnesium 10mg/kg in 50 ml Nacl0.9% over 20 minutes at end of surgery 5ml/minute infusion rate.
Randomization and blindness; the study drugs were prepared in 50 ml saline syringe according to the study randomization envelop method by an anesthesiologist who did not participate in the care and evaluation of the patients. The investigator and the patients were not aware of the drug they received.
Study outcomes (were assessed by the same clinician who cared for the patients in the perioperative and postoperative periods.)
1. Demographic data Age weight, length, BMI, operative type and operative time.
2. Hemodynamics:
Systolic blood pressure, mean arterial blood pressure, heart rate, O2 saturation will be recorded basal, 10 min, 30 min, 60 min and every one hour till 6 hours after operation then every 6 h for the 1st 12 h after surgery.
3. Pruritus Primary outcome =Incidence of pruritus in each group incidence %. Includes 3 items 1. Existence (present=1, no=0), 2. Severity (mild=1, modret=2, sever =3) 3. Site of pruritus (Face (trigeminal) =1, neuraxial (dermatome) =2) during the 1st 6 hours after spinal fentanyl injection.
4. PO 1st 24 h Magnesium dose.
5. PO 1st 24 h Naloxone.
6. The incidence of PO vomiting% in each group. -Exclusion Criteria: BMI\>35, Patient refusal, Hypersensitivity to amide local anesthetics, Fentanyl opioids, Magnesium and naloxone. Patients with coagulopathy, hepatic failure, LBBB and trifacicular block, General contraindications to spinal anesthesia, surgeon total refusal, Cardiac, hepatic, renal or respiratory failure, Difficult communication with the patient (psychological or deafness).
Side effects Management:
1. Residual Sever pruritus after the 1st magnesium bolus will be controlled 1st by 2 second postoperative 10mg/kg dose of magnesium bolus IV if not controlled within one hour Naloxone bolus dose of 0.4 mg then if pruritus attack not controlled another 0.4 mg naloxone in 100ml normal saline iv infusion over the next 1hour during the postoperative 12 hours.
2. Moderate Abdominal Pain: VAS \>4 during surgical manipulation is unaccepted and managed soon using multimodal analgesia regimen including; ketorolac slow injection in an IV bolus of 0.5mg/kg if general anesthesia needed to control pain case will be excluded from the study.
3. Nausea \& Vomiting: treated by metoclopramide 10 mg, if resistant IV bolus ondansetron 4mg, with treatment of hypotension if present.
4. Hypotension (mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) less than 65 mmHg, will be managed by using ephedrine bolus doses of 6mg, fluids and blood transfusion according to events and requirements.
5. Bradycardia (HR less than 60 b/m.) will be managed by atropine bolus of 0.5 mg.
6. Desaturation (SaO2\< 90%) will be managed by increase oxygen face mask flow up to 10 L/sec. and dealing with the airway according to the situation targeting a patient airway with breathing comfort and O2saturation\>94% In case of any respiratory depression, emergency airway equipment's and drugs for resuscitation for airway management and ventilation were kept ready.
* Sample size calculation Sample size was calculated using Power Analysis and Sample Size software program (PASS) version 15.0.5 for windows (2017) using the results published by \[S.S. Jahanbakhsh and S. Bazyar. Study on prophylactic impact of ondansetron IV on intrathecal fentanyl-induced pruritus. British Journal of Anesthesia 108 (S2): ii387-ii437 (2012) doi:10.1093/bja/aer489\] (37) With the incidence of post-operative opioid induced pruritis after spinal anesthesia as the primary outcome. Patients will be allocated into two groups: control group (placebo Group) and the study group (MG++ Group). Jahanbakhsh 2012 resulted in post-spinal fentanyl induced pruritus incidence of 34% ondansetron group versus 60% in the placebo group. The null hypothesis is assumed to be the absence of difference between both treatment modalities. A sample of 65 patients is in each group needed to achieve 80% power (1-β or the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is false) to detect a difference between the group proportions of 26% using two-sided Fisher's exact test with a significance level of 0.05(α or the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is true). The expected number of dropouts is 7 patients in each group so 72 patients will be enrolled into each group with a total study sample size number of 144 patients.
Statistical analysis IBM's SPSS Statistics (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) for Windows (version 25) will be used for statistical analysis of the collected data. Shapiro-Wilk test will be used to check the normality of the data distribution. Normally distributed continuous variables will be expressed as mean ± SD while categorical variables and the abnormally distributed continuous ones will be expressed as median and inter-quartile range or number and percentage (as appropriate). Student t-test and Mann-Whitney will be used for normally and abnormally distributed continuous data respectively. Chi-square tests will be used for categorical data using the crosstabs function. All tests will be conducted with a 95% confidence interval. If needed, bivariate correlations will be assessed using Pearson's or Spearman's correlation coefficient depending on the nature of data. P (probability) value \< 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Placebo group
bolus 50 ml nacl 0.9% at the end of surgery over 20 minutes 5ml/minute infusion rate.
IV infusion
Control group (Placebo Group): bolus 50 ml Nacl 0.9% at the end of surgery over 20 minutes 5ml/minute infusion rate.
intrathecal fentanyl
10-15mg hyperbaric bupivacaine and 30µg fentanyl intrathecally injected
IV Mg ++ group
continuous IV infusion pump of Magnesium 10mg/kg in 50 ml Nacl0.9% over 20 minutes at end of surgery 5ml/minute infusion rate.
IV infusion
Control group (Placebo Group): bolus 50 ml Nacl 0.9% at the end of surgery over 20 minutes 5ml/minute infusion rate.
intrathecal fentanyl
10-15mg hyperbaric bupivacaine and 30µg fentanyl intrathecally injected
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
IV infusion
Control group (Placebo Group): bolus 50 ml Nacl 0.9% at the end of surgery over 20 minutes 5ml/minute infusion rate.
intrathecal fentanyl
10-15mg hyperbaric bupivacaine and 30µg fentanyl intrathecally injected
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
20 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mansoura University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mohamed Abd Latif Ghanim
Associate Professor os anesthesia ICU & Pain medicine.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
mohamed ghanem
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Mansoura Faculty of Medicine-Mansoura University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Anesthesia department,Faculty of medicine, Mansoura univerisety
Al Mansurah, Dakahlia Governorate, Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
R.19.09.628.R1.R2
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.