Opioid Sparing General Venous Anesthesia With Magnesium Sulfate
NCT ID: NCT04005599
Last Updated: 2022-11-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-06-03
2022-01-06
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This project is based on a previous randomized, double blind prospective trial (conducted by one of these authors and not yet published) comparing two groups of patients who received general intravenous total anesthesia with propofol in controlled target infusion.
The surgical stress index is obtained by the interaction between the interval between heart beats and the amplitude of the photoplethysmography wave, whose algorithm generates a number related to the hemodynamic result of the increase of the sympathetic tone, which has shown to be the most sensitive resource in detecting the imbalance between the stimulus nociceptive and anti-nociception.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Magnesium Sulfate Dose in Obese Patients.
NCT04003688
Clinical Response to Magnesium Sulfate as an Adjunct in the Anesthesia
NCT05227716
The Effect of Intraperitoneal Injection of Magnesium Sulphate Versus Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant to Bupivacaine on Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Abdominal Aortic Surgery
NCT05577260
Comparative Study Between Intrathecal Magnesium Sulfate, Neostigmine and Fentanyl As Adjuvant for Bubivacaine in Postoperative Analgesia in Lower Abdominal Surgeries
NCT06685705
Sufentanil for Anesthesia Induction in Continuous Remifentanil Anesthesia
NCT01777100
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This project is based on a previous randomized, double blind prospective trial (conducted by one of these authors and not yet published) comparing two groups of patients who received general intravenous total anesthesia with propofol in controlled target infusion.
The surgical stress index is obtained by the interaction between the interval between heart beats and the amplitude of the photoplethysmography wave, whose algorithm generates a number related to the hemodynamic result of the increase of the sympathetic tone, which has shown to be the most sensitive resource in detecting the imbalance between the stimulus nociceptive and anti-nociception.
Objectives The main objective of this project is to evaluate the feasibility of the use of magnesium sulfate in replacement of remifentanil as the main analgesic agent in total venous general anesthesia in patients submitted to post-bariatric dermolipectomy surgery.
The secondary objectives will be comparison of propofol consumption, time to onset of action, time of action and cisatracurium consumption between groups. We will evaluate pain scores in the immediate postoperative period and in the mornings and afternoons of the 3 days after surgery.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Remifentanil group
Intravenous anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil
Remifentanil group
Venous general anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil.
Magnesium group
Intravenous anesthesia with propofol and magnesium sulfate
Magnesium sulfate group
Venous general anesthesia with propofol and magnesium sulfate
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Remifentanil group
Venous general anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil.
Magnesium sulfate group
Venous general anesthesia with propofol and magnesium sulfate
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* body mass index \< 35 kg/m²
* American Society of Anesthesiologists score \< III
* agreement to participate and sign the informed consent form.
Exclusion Criteria
* neuromuscular diagnosed disorder
* cardiac conduction blockade (atrioventricular block II or higher),
* use of illicit drugs
* use of calcium channel blockers
* creatinine \> 2 mg/dl.
18 Years
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Sao Paulo General Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Joaquim Edson Vieira
Associate professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Joaquim Vieira, Professor
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital das Clínicas - Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo
São Paulo, , Brazil
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CAAE 12614719.1.0000.0068
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.