Segmental Mobilization vs Entire Spine Mobilization In Lumbar Spondylosis

NCT ID: NCT04158115

Last Updated: 2020-01-13

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: COMPLETED
• Clinical Phase: NA
• Total Enrollment: 40 participants
• Study Classification: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2019-03-01
• Study Completion Date: 2019-06-30

Brief Summary

This study will compare the effect of segmental spine mobilization and entire spine mobilization in the patients with lumber spondylosis.

There will be two groups ; experimental and control. Half of study group will receive segmental mobilization along with conventional treatment such as moist heat , soft tissue mobilization and traditional stretching exercises and half of study group will receive entire spine mobilization along with the same conventional treatment given to other group.

Detailed Description

This is a randomized controlled trial which is being conducted in Pakistan Railway hospital enrolled total 40 participants diagnosed with lumbar spondylosis who fulfilled the inclusion criteria through sealed envelope method using purposive sampling technique into two groups I-e experimental (n=21) and control group(n=19).The treatment protocol administered to experimental group was Maitland entire spine mobilization along with other conventional treatments such as hot pack, soft tissue mobilization.

and home-based exercises (Bridging, knee to chest, Hamstrings stretching and TA stretching). While the control group received segmental spine mobilization along with same conventional treatment as mentioned above for 8 sessions. Physical therapy along with pharmaceutical management is effective in improving pain on NPRS, ODI values in patients with lumbar stenosis. Based on evidence that manual therapy interventions when used in combination with exercise therapy in clinical practice has beneficial effect in the treatment of degenerated lumbar spinal stenosis.

effects of 'specific segmental level 'spinal joint mobilization techniques in creating positive outcomes on pain NPRS measures and range of motion concluded that a single session of segmental joint mobilization can lead to pain reduction at both rest and with most painful offending movement.

Manual therapy approaches such as Maitland mobilizations are more productive in the management of chronic low back pain, quality of function and lumbar spine range of motion in patients of lumbar spondylosis than traditional physical therapy interventions such as muscle stretching and spinal traction.

Osteophytes were the most numerous radiographic feature detected in patients with lumbar spondylosis, with greater occurrence in men. Intervertebral disc space narrowing was more prevalent in women than men. Both distinctive radiographic features presence increased with increasing age. Disc space reduction seemed more strongly related with chronic low back pain than osteophytosis, especially in men and disc space narrowing at 2 or more segments appeared more powerfully associated with low back pain than disc space reduction at only 1 intervertebral segment.

Maitland posteroanterior spinal mobilizations are performed by a therapist on symptomatic segments after assessment compared with mobilization treatment given on any random spinal segment in patients suffering with chronic low back pain. The results were greater degree of immediate reduction of pain in patients receiving posteroanterior mobilization on symptomatic segment rather than any random segments in offending movement direction.

Conditions

Spondylosis Lumbar

Study Design

• Allocation Method: RANDOMIZED
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Primary Study Purpose: TREATMENT
• Blinding Strategy: SINGLE

Study Groups

Entire Spinal Mobilization

Entire Spinal Mobilization( All spinal segment from Co-C1to L5-S1 Moist heat. Soft tissue Mobilization Exercises. (Knee to chest, Bridging. Hamstrings Stretching, TA stretching)

Group Type: EXPERIMENTAL

Entire Spine Mobilization

Intervention Type: OTHER

8 sessions of Following: -Entire Spinal Mobilization of all spinal segment from C0 to C1 to L5 to S1 (10 reps × 3 sets), - Moist heat: 10 to 15 minutes, - Soft tissue Mobilization, - Exercises : (Knee to chest, Bridging. Hamstrings Stretching, TA stretching)

Segmental Mobilization

Segmental Mobilization. (All lumbar segment from L1-L2 to L5-S1) Moist heat. Soft tissue Mobilization Exercises (Knee to chest, Bridging. Hamstrings Stretching, TA stretching)

Group Type: ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Segmental Mobilization

Intervention Type: OTHER

8 sessions of following -Segmental Mobilization: All lumbar segment from L1 to L2 to L5 to S1 (10 reps × 3 sets) - Moist heat: (10 to 15 minutes), -Soft tissue Mobilization

• Exercises: (Knee to chest, Bridging. Hamstrings Stretching, TA stretching)

Interventions

Entire Spine Mobilization

8 sessions of Following: -Entire Spinal Mobilization of all spinal segment from C0 to C1 to L5 to S1 (10 reps × 3 sets), - Moist heat: 10 to 15 minutes, - Soft tissue Mobilization, - Exercises : (Knee to chest, Bridging. Hamstrings Stretching, TA stretching)

Intervention Type: OTHER

Segmental Mobilization

8 sessions of following -Segmental Mobilization: All lumbar segment from L1 to L2 to L5 to S1 (10 reps × 3 sets) - Moist heat: (10 to 15 minutes), -Soft tissue Mobilization

• Exercises: (Knee to chest, Bridging. Hamstrings Stretching, TA stretching)

Intervention Type: OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• Lumbar spondylosis.
• Limited ROM (at least two)
• Symptoms more than month

Exclusion Criteria

• Spinal stenosis.
• Osteoporosis in X-ray.
• Significant Trauma/Fracture (with in last 06 month)
• Spondylolysis.
• Inflammatory arthritis.

• Minimum Eligible Age: 30 Years
• Maximum Eligible Age: 60 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Sponsors

Riphah International University

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Responsibility Role: SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Abdul Ghafoor Sajjad, Phd*

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Riphah International University

Locations

Riphah International university

Rawalpindi, Punjab Province, Pakistan

Countries

Pakistan

References

Reiman MP, Harris JY, Cleland JA. Manual therapy interventions for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review. InDatabase of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE): Quality-assessed Reviews [Internet] 2009. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (UK).

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Slaven EJ, Goode AP, Coronado RA, Poole C, Hegedus EJ. The relative effectiveness of segment specific level and non-specific level spinal joint mobilization on pain and range of motion: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Man Manip Ther. 2013 Feb;21(1):7-17. doi: 10.1179/2042618612Y.0000000016.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 24421608 (View on PubMed)

Sharma A, Alahmari K, Ahmed I. Efficacy of Manual Therapy versus Conventional Physical Therapy in Chronic Low Back Pain Due to Lumbar Spondylosis. A Pilot Study. Med Sci (Basel). 2015 Jun 26;3(3):55-63. doi: 10.3390/medsci3030055.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 29083391 (View on PubMed)

Osama, Muhammad & Malik, Reem & Ahmad, Shakeel. (2017). Effects of facet joint mobilization in patients with straightening of the cervical spine: A pilot study. 10.13140/RG.2.2.15585.10083.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Other Identifiers

Sadaf nisar REC/00343

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id