Safety and Efficiency of Combined Extracorporeal Blood Purification in Neurosurgical ICU. Prospective RCT
NCT ID: NCT04152174
Last Updated: 2021-09-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
14 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-04-10
2021-11-10
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Selective Plasmofiltration for Abdominal Septic Shock: a Clinical Ctudy
NCT07121647
Preemptive Resuscitation for Eradication of Septic Shock
NCT01449721
Combined Hemoperfusion and Therapeutic Plasma Exchange for Treatment of Patients With Septic Shock
NCT06404424
Effectiveness of Non-invasive Vagus Nerve Stimulation as an Adjuvant Treatment in Patients With Sepsis in Intensive Care.
NCT04774705
Clearance of Antibacterial Agents During Hemoperfusion in Patients With Sepsis
NCT06602245
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Effectiveness of other extracoporeal blood purification methods, such as hemoadsorption or combined blood purification (hemoadsorption combined with CRRT) is widely pointed out in current publications: contemporary studies in general ICU patients demonstrated that the use of hemoadsorption or combined extracorporeal blood purification methods is effective for septic shock patients treatment.
It has been proven that cytokines discharged into the systemic blood flow are the key pathophysiological mechanism of septic shock. Hemoadsorption allows for significantly more effective removal of different inflammatory mediators than the traditional methods of CRRT. The combined extracorporeal blood purification method demonstrated similar efficacy in general ICU patients.
The aim of this study is to assess the efficiency and safety of combined extracorporeal blood purification in with septic shock in neurosurgical ICU in comparison with the efficiency and safety of the continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) with AN69 membrane.
Study novelty: We have not encountered published studies evaluating the efficiency of combined extracorporeal blood purification methods in neurosurgical patients with septic shock. Furthermore, currently there is not enough data to compare combined extracorporeal blood purification with CRRT for septic shock treatment. The planned study is the first to investigate the safety and efficiency of combined extracorporeal blood purification in patients with septic shock in neurosurgical ICU.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Combined extracorporeal blood purification
CRRT with CVVHDF mode plus treatment with CytSorb adsorber
Combined extracorporeal blood purification
Patients receive combined extracorporeal blood purification: CRRT in CVVHDF mode with AN 69 ST set (Baxter) and hemoadsorption with Cytosorbents Corp. CytoSorb adsorber.
Control
CRRT with CVVHDF mode
CRRT
Patients receive CRRT in CVVHDF mode with AN 69 ST set (Baxter)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Combined extracorporeal blood purification
Patients receive combined extracorporeal blood purification: CRRT in CVVHDF mode with AN 69 ST set (Baxter) and hemoadsorption with Cytosorbents Corp. CytoSorb adsorber.
CRRT
Patients receive CRRT in CVVHDF mode with AN 69 ST set (Baxter)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Glasgow Coma Scale of 4 and more on admission
* invasive hemodynamics monitoring
* norepinephrine \> 0,1 µg/kg/min or use of 2 vasopressors
Exclusion Criteria
* \>24 hours after diagnosis of septic shock
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Burdenko Neurosurgery Institute
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Aleksandr Burov
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
N. N. Burdenko National Medical Research Center of Neurosurgery
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Federal State Autonomous Institution "N .N. Burdenko National Medical Research Center of Neurosurgery" of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
Moscow, , Russia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PPI-2018-06-5
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.