Mitochondrial Function in Septic Patients

NCT ID: NCT03748537

Last Updated: 2020-01-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-01-01

Study Completion Date

2019-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Aim #1 To investigate the prevalence, risk and correlation of the level of sepsis with mitochondrial dysfunction in sepsis patients Aim 1.1 To investigate the prevalence of mitochondria dysfunction among sepsis patients Aim 1.2 To investigate the risk associated with mitochondrial dysfunction in sepsis patients.

Aim 1.3 To investigate the association between sepsis severity (SOFA scoring system) and the degree of mitochondrial dysfunction Aim #2 To investigate the association of mitochondrial dysfunction in sepsis with ScvO2, lactate and ∆PCO2 Aim 3.1 To investigate the therapeutic efficacy of steroids on the improvement mitochondrial function in sepsis patients Aim 3.2. To investigate the efficacy of steroids on the reduction mortality rate in sepsis patients with norepinephrine-resistant hypotension

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Aim #1 To investigate the prevalence, risk and correlation of the level of sepsis with mitochondrial dysfunction in sepsis patients Aim 1.1 To investigate the prevalence of mitochondria dysfunction among sepsis patients Hypothesis: Most of sepsis patients are affected by mitochondria dysfunction. Since there are many suspected cases of sepsis in the emergency department, mitochondrial function measurements will be collected. After the patients are diagnosed, the degree of mitochondrial function will be reported as a percent among all of sepsis patients.

Aim 1.2 To investigate the risk associated with mitochondrial dysfunction in sepsis patients.

Hypothesis: Some risks other than infection are associated with mitochondrial dysfunction in septic patient.

Since there are many suspected cases of sepsis in the emergency department, mitochondrial function measurements will be collected. After the patients are diagnosed, the degree of mitochondrial function will be reported at intervals. Additionally, the correlation among sex, age, obesity, underlying symptoms, cause of infection, pathogen, onset of fever before emergency department visit, number of organ dysfunction, presence of shock and other hemodynamic parameter will be collected.

Aim 1.3 To investigate the association between sepsis severity (SOFA scoring system) and the degree of mitochondrial dysfunction Hypothesis: The severity of sepsis and organ dysfunction are associated with the severity of mitochondrial dysfunction.

Since there are many suspected cases of sepsis in the emergency department, mitochondrial function measurements will be collected. After the patients are diagnosed, the degree of mitochondrial function will be reported at intervals along with the correlation with the severity of sepsis in SOFA scoring system.

Aim #2 To investigate the association of mitochondrial dysfunction in sepsis with ScvO2, lactate and ∆PCO2 Hypothesis: Persistence of high lactate and extreme change of ScvO2 or ∆PCO2 after sepsis bundle care are associated with severity of mitochondrial dysfunction.

Since patients are suspected of having sepsis with hypoperfusion (1. Blood lactate \> 4 mmol/L, 2. Refractory hypotension: after bolus fluid 20 mL/kg and Systolic Blood Pressure still \< 90 mmHg or require vasopressor), the sepsis bundle care will be started in the emergency department. The goals of this treatment are 1. A mean arterial pressure of \> 65 is achieved by fluid resuscitation and vasopressor, 2. Lactate \> 4 mmol/L or ScvO2 \> 70 is achieved. After 6 hours following the beginning of resuscitation, blood examination for mitochondrial function, ScvO2 and ∆PCO2 will be determined. The correlation between these physiologic/biomarkers and mitochondrial function will be evaluated.

Aim #3 To investigate the roles of steroid administration on mitochondrial function in sepsis patients (Therapeutic trial) Aim 3.1 To investigate the therapeutic efficacy of steroids on the improvement mitochondrial function in sepsis patients Hypothesis: Steroids administration improve mitochondrial function in norepinephrine-resistant sepsis.

After resuscitation, hypoperfusion in the sepsis patients will be treated by fluid resuscitation and vasopressor. Some groups of patients may be not responsive to this treatment (MAP \<65 mmHg), administration of steroids to this group will be blindly randomized (treatment and control group). During resuscitation of septic shock patients with fluid resuscitation and vasopressors, some may not respond to treatment (MAP \< 65 mmHg). Patients who have shock refractory to fluid resuscitation and norepinephrine therapy for more than 0.5 mcg/kg/min will be blindly randomized to receive steroid (treatment group) or placebo (control group). Blood samples will be obtained to determine mitochondrial functioning before, at day 1 and day 7 after administration of study medications in both groups.

Aim 3.2. To investigate the efficacy of steroids on the reduction mortality rate in sepsis patients with norepinephrine-resistant hypotension Hypothesis: Steroids improve survival in septic shock patients with norepinephrine-resistant hypotension.

During resuscitation of septic shock patients with fluid resuscitation and vasopressors, some may not respond to treatment (MAP \< 65 mmHg). Patients who have shock refractory to fluid resuscitation and norepinephrine administration more than 0.5 mcg/kg/min will be blindly randomized to receive steroid (treatment group) or placebo (control group). Blood samples will be obtained to determine mitochondrial functioning before, at day 1 and day 7 after administration of study medications in both groups. Thirty-day survival will be analyzed by a survival analysis.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Sepsis Septic Shock

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Eligible patients for aim#3 will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio of hydrocortisone and no hydrocortisone administration (control group), in a block of four patterns. Serum cortisol will be collected before administration.

Hydrocortisone will be administered intravenously at 200 mg every 24 hours for 5 days, then tapered to a 50 mg intravenous bolus every 12 hours for days 6 to 8 and 50 mg every 24 hours for days 9 to 11, and then stopped. In control group, patient will not receive any corticosteroids for seven day after inclusion.
Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Hydrocortisone

Hydrocortisone will be administered intravenously at 200 mg every 24 hours for 5 days, then tapered to a 50 mg intravenous bolus every 12 hours for days 6 to 8 and 50 mg every 24 hours for days 9 to 11, and then stopped.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Hydrocortisone

Intervention Type DRUG

After resuscitation, hypoperfusion in the sepsis patients will be treated by fluid resuscitation and vasopressor. Some groups of patients may be not responsive to this treatment (MAP \<65 mmHg), administration of steroids to this group will be blindly randomized (treatment and control group). During resuscitation of septic shock patients with fluid resuscitation and vasopressors, some may not respond to treatment (MAP \< 65 mmHg). Patients who have shock refractory to fluid resuscitation and norepinephrine therapy for more than 0.5 mcg/kg/min will be blindly randomized to receive steroid (treatment group) or placebo (control group). Blood samples will be obtained to determine mitochondrial functioning before, at day 1 and day 7 after administration of study medications in both groups.

No Hydrocortisone

In control group, patient will not receive any corticosteroids for seven day after inclusion.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Hydrocortisone

After resuscitation, hypoperfusion in the sepsis patients will be treated by fluid resuscitation and vasopressor. Some groups of patients may be not responsive to this treatment (MAP \<65 mmHg), administration of steroids to this group will be blindly randomized (treatment and control group). During resuscitation of septic shock patients with fluid resuscitation and vasopressors, some may not respond to treatment (MAP \< 65 mmHg). Patients who have shock refractory to fluid resuscitation and norepinephrine therapy for more than 0.5 mcg/kg/min will be blindly randomized to receive steroid (treatment group) or placebo (control group). Blood samples will be obtained to determine mitochondrial functioning before, at day 1 and day 7 after administration of study medications in both groups.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Cortisol

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Adults (≥18 years of age)
2. Diagnosis of sepsis within 1 hour after presentation to the emergency department: known or presumed infection and SOFA score \> 2 (table1)
3. Norepinephrine-resistant hypotension (refractory hypotension and not response to norepinephrine dose ≥ 0.5 mcg/k/min)

Exclusion Criteria

1. Known pregnancy
2. Primary diagnosis of:

1. acute cerebral vascular event
2. acute coronary syndrome
3. acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema
4. status asthmaticus
5. major cardiac arrhythmia (as part of primary diagnosis)
6. seizure
7. drug overdose
8. injury from burn or trauma
3. Hemodynamic instability due to active hemorrhage
4. Requirement for immediate surgery
5. Do-Not-Attempt-Resuscitation (DNAR) order
6. Advanced directives restricting implementation of the resuscitation protocol
7. Transferred from another in-hospital setting
8. Sepsis or septic shock is not final diagnosis
9. Known history of HIV infection with suspected or known Cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4) \<100 /mm2
10. Contraindication to central venous catheterization
11. Contraindication to blood transfusion
12. Attending clinician deems aggressive resuscitation unsuitable
13. Known history of HIV infection with suspected or known CD4 \<100 /mm2
14. Neurodegenerative disease (effected mitochondria function)
15. known case adrenal insufficiency or chronic steroid user (Patient in this group should receive Hydrocortisone)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Chiang Mai University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Borwon Wittayachamnankul

Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

BORWON WITTAYACHAMNANKUL, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Emergency Department, Medicine Faculty, Chiang Mai University, Thailand

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Emergency Department, Faculty of Medicine, Chaing Mai University

Chiang Mai, , Thailand

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Thailand

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

EME-2559-04262

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.