Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE2
2 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-10-04
2020-05-04
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Early Metabolic Support as a Potential Solution to Multi-Organ Dysfunction Syndrome (MODS) During Severe Sepsis
NCT02885688
Preemptive Resuscitation for Eradication of Septic Shock
NCT01449721
Impact of Metabolite Supplementation to Restore Mitochondrial Dysfunction During Septic Shock: a Preclinical Study
NCT04288635
A Randomized Controlled Study of Enteral Nutrition in Septic Shock
NCT02025127
Protocol-driven Hemodynamic Support for Patients With Septic Shock
NCT00335907
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
I. To assess the efficacy of administering early metabolic resuscitation with standard of care (SC + EMR) in patients diagnosed with septic shock for reducing 28-day mortality versus using the standard of care alone (SC).
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To assess whether early metabolic resuscitation with standard of care (SC + EMR) is an effective strategy to reduce intensive care unit (ICU) mortality, hospital mortality, and 90-day mortality of septic shock patients relative to SC.
II. To compare the time to death from any cause between patients administered SC + EMR versus SC after being diagnosed with septic shock.
III. To assess whether SC + EMR is an effective strategy to reduce complications of septic shock such as: i) acute kidney injury, ii) dialysis requirements, iii) need for cardiovascular support or days on vasopressors, iv) need for invasive ventilation, days on ventilator support, v) duration of ICU stay, and vi) duration of hospital stay versus SC.
IV. To describe the presence of any adverse effects between the two study groups (SC + EMR group versus \[vs\] SC group); thus, characterizing their safety.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 groups.
GROUP I: Patients receive standard of care for septic shock.
GROUP II: Patients receive standard of care treatment for septic shock and early metabolic resuscitation (IV) over continuous infusion for up to 7 days.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group I (standard of care)
Patients receive standard of care for septic shock.
Best Practice
Receive standard of care
Group II (early metabolic resuscitation)
Patients receive standard of care treatment for septic shock and early metabolic resuscitation (IV) over continuous infusion for up to 7 days.
Best Practice
Receive standard of care
early metabolic resuscitation
Given Intravenous
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Best Practice
Receive standard of care
early metabolic resuscitation
Given Intravenous
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Diagnosis of septic shock within 12 hours of ICU admission defined as meeting criteria for sepsis in addition to the following: A) Vasopressor therapy needed to elevate mean arterial pressure (MAP) \>= 65 mmg Hg. B) Lactate \> 2 mmol/L (18 mg/dL) after adequate fluid resuscitation.
* Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score meeting the following requirements A) Cardiovascular SOFA \>= 2 B) Total SOFA score =\< 12.
* Patients meeting the above and not able to tolerate enteral nutrition above 70% of their estimated daily caloric need.
* Hyperphosphatemia: Serum phosphorous \> 5.5 mg/dL.
* Patient with a history of metabolic abnormality in any one of the following amino acids: alanine, arginine, cysteine hydrochloride, glycine, histidine, isoleucine, leucine, lysine acetate, methionine, phenylalanine, phosphoric acid, proline, serine, threonine, tryptophan, and valine.
Exclusion Criteria
* Comfort care and end-of-life patients.
* Patients with SOFA scores greater than 12.
* Pregnant women.
* Jehovah Witnesses that do not accept albumin.
* Active bleeding (e.g., gastrointestinal bleeding).
* Acute neurological syndromes (e.g., stroke, hemorrhage, etc.).
* End-stage renal disease (ESRD).
* Chronic liver disease
* Child-Pugh class C
* Diagnosis of cirrhosis
* Heart rate less than 50 beats per minute (bpm).
* Respiratory rate less than 8 respirations per minute (rpm).
* Temperature less than 95 degrees Fahrenheit (F) or 35 degrees Celsius (C).
* Tumor lysis syndrome.
* Sulfite allergy: amino acids administration are contraindicated. It is more common in steroid dependent asthmatics. (Please note that this is NOT sulfa allergy and is NOT contraindicated patients with sulfa allergy). Sulfites are present in dried fruits, beer, wines, sausages, jams, maple syrup, and many other food products.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
NIH
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Joseph L. Nates, MBA,MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
M D Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
MD Anderson Cancer Center Website
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NCI-2019-01392
Identifier Type: REGISTRY
Identifier Source: secondary_id
2018-0986
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
2018-0986
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.