Effect of Therapeutic Joint Arthrocentesis on Pain and Quadriceps Function in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis
NCT ID: NCT04146649
Last Updated: 2023-08-31
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
66 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-12-05
2023-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluating Changes in Synovial Fluid Before and After GAE for Knee Osteoarthritis
NCT06940479
A Crossover Designed Study to Evaluate Effects of Microcurrent Therapy on Knee Osteoarthritis
NCT03332914
Clinical Study of Novel Diagnostic Techniques for Knee Osteoarthritis
NCT01359553
Geniculate Artery Embolization for Osteoarthritis
NCT04456569
The Effects of Joint Effusion on Proprioception
NCT01060215
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Knee pain will be assessed with an 11-point numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) where 0 represents 'no pain' and 10 represents 'worst imaginable pain'. Self-reported physical function will be assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) for each knee separately. The WOMAC assesses the impact of knee osteoarthritis on multiple domains-pain, stiffness, and disability. A composite score (0-100 scale) will be used for analysis.
Range of Motion
Knee range of motion (ROM) is a direct measure of joint mobility following TKA. Knee ROM will be measured in the supine position both actively and passively using a long-arm goniometer. Goniometry has been shown to be a reliable measure of knee ROM after TKA.
Quadriceps Strength and Activation Testing
Maximum voluntary isometric quadriceps strength and quadriceps activation will be assessed before surgery and at week 3 using an electromechanical dynamometer (Humac Norm, CSMI) and a doublet interpolation test. Patients will be seated on the electromechanical dynamometer with their hips flexed to approximately 85° and their knees flexed to 60°. Two 3" by 5" self-adhesive neuromuscular stimulation electrodes will be placed over the motor points of the rectus femoris and the vastus medialis. A Grass S48 stimulator with a Grass Model SIU8T stimulus isolation unit will be used to deliver 600 µs doublet pulses. A Biopac MP150WSW system will be used for data acquisition during testing with sampling frequency of 300 Hz.
Following two warm-up contractions, a practice maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) will be performed against the dynamometer's force transducer. Visual torque targets will be set on the feedback monitor at slightly higher torques than produced during the practice MVIC trial. Trials will be repeated until maximal torque is within 5% of the previous attempt. Torque from quadriceps MVIC will be normalized to body weight for between-subject comparisons.
Voluntary activation of the quadriceps muscle will be assessed using the doublet interpolation technique, where a supramaximal stimulus will be applied by a Grass S48 stimulator during an MVIC and immediately afterwards while the quadriceps muscle is at
rest. Normalization of the force from the superimposed doublet to the resting doublet allows for comparisons of quadriceps activation across individuals and lower extremities.
Timed-Up-and-Go
The timed-up-and-go (TUG) test is a responsive, valid, and reliable functional measure of basic mobility and dynamic balance. The examiner measures the time, in seconds, required by the patient to a) rise from an arm chair; b) walk 3 meters; c) turn and walk back to the arm chair; and d) return to the seated position.
30-second Sit-to-Stand Test
The 30-second Sit-to-Stand test (30STS) is a responsive, valid, and reliable functional measure of lower extremity strength after TKA. This test counts the number of times a patient can rise to a full standing position in 30 seconds. The test starting position is sitting on an armless chair with seat plate 17 inches from the floor. Patients rise from this position with hands placed on opposite shoulders. If the patient must use his/her arms to stand, the test is stopped. If the patient is over halfway to a standing position when 30 seconds have lapsed, this counts as a stand.
Bioimpedance Spectroscopy
Bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) is a reliable, responsive measure of swelling that has been validated in observational studies of individuals after TKA. The RJL Systems Quantum® (Clinton Township, MI) bioelectrical impedance device delivers a 2.5 µA alternating current at a frequency of 50 kHz. The tissue impedance to this current is displayed in Ohms (Ω) and is recorded at a precision of 1 Ω. The level of impedance met by the current reflects the composition of the tissue, but will also fluctuate with the presence of swelling in the lower extremity. Lower levels of impedance represent the increased fluid content present with greater levels of swelling. Measuring the impedance of both the involved and uninvolved limb allows for calculation of a ratio (W-involved limb: W-uninvolved limb). To measure impedance, a four-wire measurement method will be used. The most proximal electrode pair will be placed 10 and 20 centimeters above the superior patellar pole. The most distal electrode pair will be placed at a point bisecting the medial and lateral malleolus, and also 10 cm distal to that point along the second ray of the foot. New electrodes will be used for each testing session, and skin will be cleaned with an alcohol swab prior to electrode placement.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Primary Osteoarthritis
Patients with native knees and effusions will participate in this arm.
Arthrocentesis
Patients will receive a joint arthrocentesis to remove fluid from the joint.
Primary TKA
Patients with total knee replacements will participate in this arm.
Arthrocentesis
Patients will receive a joint arthrocentesis to remove fluid from the joint.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Arthrocentesis
Patients will receive a joint arthrocentesis to remove fluid from the joint.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patients with symptomatic primary total knee arthroplasty without infection (as verified by prior aspiration) with moderate to severe effusion electing for therapeutic arthrocentesis. Must be minimum of 3 months from index surgery to be included.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patients with known history of gout or with synovial fluid samples testing positive for urate of calcium pyrophosphate crystals
3. Patients with knee effusion associated with septic arthritis or periprosthetic knee infection as determined from knee arthrocentesis.
4. Patients with inflammatory arthritis (ie. JIA, RA, psoriatic arthritis, etc).
5. Patients with revision knee arthroplasty, unicompartmental arthroplasty or other repair/reconstruction surgery
6. Patients with underlying muscular disorder (ie. Stroke, cerebral palsy, multiple sclerosis, polymyalgia, fibromyalgia, muscular dystrophy, etc.)
7. Patients with symptomatic hip pain
8. Patients with active cancer in the area
9. Patients with pacemakers
10. Patients who are pregnant
11. Invasive or injectable therapy within the last 6 months in the involved knee, to include, but not limited to, arthrocentesis, corticosteroid, hyaluronic acid, platelet-rich plasma, prolotherapy, stem cell therapy, or genicular nerve block.
12. Blood clotting disorders, sickle cell disease or trait, or chronic anticoagulation.
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Colorado Joint Replacement
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jason Jennings
Primary Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jason Jennings, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Colorado Joint Replacement
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Colorado Denver
Aurora, Colorado, United States
Colorado Joint Replacement
Denver, Colorado, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lawrence RC, Felson DT, Helmick CG, Arnold LM, Choi H, Deyo RA, Gabriel S, Hirsch R, Hochberg MC, Hunder GG, Jordan JM, Katz JN, Kremers HM, Wolfe F; National Arthritis Data Workgroup. Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and other rheumatic conditions in the United States. Part II. Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Jan;58(1):26-35. doi: 10.1002/art.23176.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Prevalence and most common causes of disability among adults--United States, 2005. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009 May 1;58(16):421-6.
Neogi T. The epidemiology and impact of pain in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013 Sep;21(9):1145-53. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2013.03.018.
Dieppe PA, Lohmander LS. Pathogenesis and management of pain in osteoarthritis. Lancet. 2005 Mar 12-18;365(9463):965-73. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)71086-2.
Egloff C, Hugle T, Valderrabano V. Biomechanics and pathomechanisms of osteoarthritis. Swiss Med Wkly. 2012 Jul 19;142:w13583. doi: 10.4414/smw.2012.13583. eCollection 2012.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1415301
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.