Coolief Cooled Radiofrequency vs. Conventional Radiofrequency to Manage OA Knee Pain
NCT ID: NCT04145011
Last Updated: 2023-08-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
153 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-10-04
2022-10-10
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Efficacy of Cooled and Monopolar Radiofrequency Ablation of the Geniculate Nerves for the Treatment of Chronic Osteoarthritic Knee Pain
NCT02260869
Fluoroscopic Versus Ultrasound Guidance for Cooled Radiofrequency Ablation of Geniculate Nerves in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Control Trial
NCT04472702
Patients With Chronic Knee Pain Treated With Conventional Radiofrequency of the Genicular Nerves
NCT04234984
Comparison of Conventional and Cooled Radiofrequency of the Genicular Nerves in Patients With Chronic Knee Pain
NCT05407610
Management of Knee Pain by Cooled Radiofrequency in Classical Anatomical Targets and Revised Targets
NCT05363241
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
COOLIEF Cooled Radiofrequency Probe
Cooled radiofrequency energy will be delivered to the study subjects' knee to ablate culprit sensory nerves and reduce knee pain
Cooled Radiofrequency
Delivery of energy to ablate sensory nerves via cooled radiofrequency probe (18g, 4mm active tip)
Conventional (Standard) Radiofrequency Probe
Standard (non-cooled) radiofrequency energy will be delivered to the study subjects' knee to ablate culprit sensory nerves and reduce knee pain
Standard Radiofrequency
Delivery of energy to ablate sensory nerves via non-cooled standard radiofrequency probe (22g, curved 10mm active tip)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cooled Radiofrequency
Delivery of energy to ablate sensory nerves via cooled radiofrequency probe (18g, 4mm active tip)
Standard Radiofrequency
Delivery of energy to ablate sensory nerves via non-cooled standard radiofrequency probe (22g, curved 10mm active tip)
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Able to understand and personally sign and date the informed consent form
3. Able to complete outcome measures
4. Chronic knee pain for longer than 6 months that interferes with functional activities (for example, ambulation, prolonged standing, etc.)
5. Continued pain in the target knee despite at least 3 months of conservative treatments, including activity modification, home exercise, protective weight bearing, and/or analgesics (for example, acetaminophen or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs \[NSAIDs\])
6. Positive response (defined as a decrease in numeric pain scores of at least 50%) to a single genicular nerve block of the index knee
7. Pain on NRS ≥ 6 on an 11-point scale for the index knee
8. Radiologic confirmation of osteoarthritis (x-ray/MRI/CT) grade 2 (mild), 3 (moderate) or 4 (severe) noted within 6 months for the index knee
9. Analgesics including membrane stabilizers such as Neurontin (gabapentin) and antidepressants for pain, such as Cymbalta (duloxetine), must be clinically stable (defined as stable dosage for ≥ 6 weeks prior to the screening visit) and shall not change during the course of the study without approval of the investigator
10. Agree to see one physician (study physician) for knee pain during the study period
11. Subjects of child bearing potential must be willing to utilize double barrier contraceptive method
12. Willingness to comply with the requirements of this protocol for the full duration of the study (24 months regardless of effect of initial therapy)
Exclusion Criteria
2. Evidence of neuropathic pain affecting the index knee
3. Previous or pending lower limb amputation
4. Intra-articular steroid injection into the index knee within 90 days from randomization
5. Hyaluronic acid injection, platelet rich plasma (PRP), stem cell, or arthroscopic debridement/lavage injection into the index knee within 180 days from randomization
6. Prior radiofrequency ablation of the genicular nerves of the index knee
7. Prior partial, resurfacing, or total knee arthroplasty of the index knee (residual hardware)
8. Clinically significant ligamentous laxity of the index knee
9. Clinically significant valgus/varus deformities or evidence of pathology (other than osteoarthritis of knee) that materially affects gait or function of the knee or is the underlying cause of the knee pain and/or functional limitations
10. Body mass index (BMI) \> 40 kg/m2
11. Extremely thin patients and those with minimal subcutaneous tissue thickness that would not accommodate a radiofrequency lesion of up to 14 mm in diameter to limit the risk of skin burns
12. Pending or active compensation claim, litigation, or disability remuneration (secondary gain)
13. Pregnant, nursing or intent of becoming pregnant during the study period
14. Chronic pain associated with significant psychosocial dysfunction
15. Poorly controlled severe psychiatric illness or ongoing psychological barriers to recovery, as determined by the investigator
16. Allergies to any of the medications to be used during the procedures
17. Active joint infection or systemic or localized infection at needle entry sites (subject may be considered for inclusion once infection is resolved)
18. History of uncontrolled coagulopathy, ongoing coagulation treatment that cannot be safely interrupted for procedure, or unexplained or uncontrollable bleeding that is uncorrectable
19. Identifiable anatomical variability that would materially alter the procedure as described in the protocol
20. Within the preceding 2 years, subject has suffered from active narcotic addiction, substance, or alcohol abuse
21. Current prescribed opioid medications greater than 60 mg morphine equivalent daily opioid dose
22. Uncontrolled immunosuppression (e.g. AIDS, cancer, diabetes, etc.)
23. Subject currently implanted with pacemaker, stimulator or defibrillator
24. Participating in another clinical trial/investigation which included therapeutic treatment within 30 days prior to signing informed consent
25. Subject unwilling or unable to comply with follow up schedule, protocol requirements or procedures
21 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Avanos Medical
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
David Kennedy, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Vanderbilt Stallworth Rehabilitation Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Orthopedics Center
Altoona, Pennsylvania, United States
Pain Diagnostics and Interventional Care
Sewickley, Pennsylvania, United States
University Orthopedics Center
State College, Pennsylvania, United States
Piedmont Comprehensive Pain Management
Anderson, South Carolina, United States
University of Utah
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
University of Virginia
Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
The Spine and Nerve Centers of St. Francis Hosptial
Charleston, West Virginia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
105-18-0002
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.