To Compare Ridge Preservation Technique Using Leukocyte Platelet Rich Fibrin (L-PRF) and Freeze-dried Bone Allograft (FDBA) Layered Technique vs L-PRF/FDBA and L-PRF Alone in Influencing Quantity and Quality of New Bone Formation in Grafted Extraction Sockets
NCT ID: NCT04133363
Last Updated: 2024-09-26
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-06-15
2023-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Pre (baseline)- and post-grafting (3 months) clinical as well as 2- and 3-dimensional radiographic measurements will be used to evaluate the dimensional ridge changes between sites grafted with L-PRF/FDBA layered technique vs. L-PRF/FDBA and L-PRF alone.
Histological analysis will be performed by a bone biopsy taken at time of surgical re-entry (after 3 months) of grafted sites to place the dental implant and assessed for differences in new bone formation between the three types of graft.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Changes of Soft and Hard Tissues After Alveolar Ridge Preservation: Freeze-dried Bone Allograft vs. L-PRF Clot
NCT03331185
Leukocyte-platelet Rich Fibrin for Alveolar Ridge Preservation
NCT05572242
A 14 Weeks Longitudinal Study to Investigate the Effect of Leukocyte- Platelet Rich Fibrin Plug on the Quality of the Newly Formed Bone in Ridge Preservation Procedure Following a Tooth Extraction. It is a Clinical, Radiographic and Histomorphometric Study.
NCT03487718
Bovine-derived Xenograft With or Without L-PRF for Alveolar Ridge Preservation After Tooth Extraction: a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT06172114
Influence of Platelet-Rich Fibrin on Post-extraction Alveolar Ridge Healing/Preservation as a Stand-alone or Adjunct to Particulate Graft
NCT02707536
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Qualifying participants and defects will be randomized following a computerized permutation block to receive either technique on day of surgery. Tooth extraction will be performed with a flapless minimally invasive technique, followed by socket grafting with a randomized graft.
The mineralized cortico-cancellous bone allograft that will be used in this study will be obtained from the same donor, lot and tissue bank to account for variation in age, race, gender and related healing potential of different graft sources.
Bone core biopsies will be harvested at time of implant placement 3 months following socket grafting. Bone cores will then undergo histological and histomorphometrical analyses to determine qualitative and quantitative healing differences between three treatment groups.
Clinical measurements are gathered at 2 time points (grating and implant placement) at all defects and will be compared for differences.
Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) initial scans are conducted immediately following socket grafting and second scans obtained prior to implant placement. Virtual implant planning software will be utilized to assess and compare the 2- and 3-dimensional changes for all defects.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Ridge preservation using L-PRF/ FDBA Layered
Atraumatic tooth extraction following by socket grafting using L-PRF/FDBA layered technique
Ridge preservation using L-PRF/FDBA layered technique
Atraumatic tooth extraction following by socket grafting using L-PRF/FDBA layered technique
Ridge preservation using L-PRF/ FDBA
Atraumatic tooth extraction following by socket grafting using L-PRF/FDBA
Ridge preservation using L-PRF/FDBA
Atraumatic tooth extraction following by socket grafting using L-PRF/FDBA
Ridge preservation using L-PRF
Atraumatic tooth extraction following by socket grafting using L-PRF alone
Ridge preservation using L-PRF
Atraumatic tooth extraction following by socket grafting using L-PRF
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ridge preservation using L-PRF/FDBA layered technique
Atraumatic tooth extraction following by socket grafting using L-PRF/FDBA layered technique
Ridge preservation using L-PRF/FDBA
Atraumatic tooth extraction following by socket grafting using L-PRF/FDBA
Ridge preservation using L-PRF
Atraumatic tooth extraction following by socket grafting using L-PRF
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* At least 18 years old.
* Must be a patient at the UAB School of Dentistry
* Patient is willing and able to comply with all steps of the study
* Hopeless single-rooted tooth planned to be replaced with a dental implant and with healthy adjacent teeth not planned for extraction.
Exclusion Criteria
* Pregnant women
* Patient is a poor compliance risk (i.e., poor oral hygiene, history of alcohol or drug abuse)
18 Years
99 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Alabama at Birmingham
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Nicolaas C. Geurs, DDS, MS
Principal Investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRB-300004112
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.