The Consistency of Drug Screening in Vitro and Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Results in Breast Cancer Patients

NCT ID: NCT04131881

Last Updated: 2019-10-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

45 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-04-01

Study Completion Date

2019-09-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer could make unresectable breast cancer be resectable and improve breast conservation rate. Patients with triple negative or Her2 enriched subtype who achieved pCR after neoadjuvant chemotherapy would have better survival. But the overall pCR rate of breast cancer was about 20%. And patients with luminal like subtype were less reactive for neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Improving pCR rate maybe could achieve better survival. So, different methods have tried to select effective drug before chemotherapy.Drug sensitivity screening in vitro for different chemotherapy drugs was a promising method. This study will explore whether drug screening by culturing breast cancer cells in vitro from breast cancer tissue could consistent with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients.40 breast cancer patients were recruited.The results of drug sensitivity in vitro and pathological evaluation after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were compared whether they were consistent.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer could make unresectable breast cancer be resectable and improve breast conservation rate. Patients with triple negative or Her2 enriched subtype who achieved pCR after neoadjuvant chemotherapy would have better survival. But the overall pCR rate of breast cancer was about 20%. And patients with luminal like subtype were less reactive for neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Improving pCR rate maybe could achieve better survival. So, different methods have tried to select effective drug before chemotherapy.Drug sensitivity screening in vitro for different chemotherapy drugs was a promising method. This study will explore whether drug screening by culturing breast cancer cells in vitro from breast cancer tissue could consistent with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients.40 breast cancer patients who would receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy were recruited.Breast cancer tissues were obtained before chemotherapy. The breast cancer cells were cultured in unadhesive dishes. Chemotherapy drugs were put in dishes and drug sensitivity were evaluated. Patients received operation and pathological evaluationc after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The results of drug sensitivity in vitro and pathological evaluation after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were compared whether they were consistent.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Breast Cancer Drug Effect

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* invasive breast cancer candidates for neoadjuvant chemotherapy agreed to participate in this observative experiments could receive operation normal liver and renal function

Exclusion Criteria

* inflammatory breast cancer recurrent breast cancer
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Peking University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Peking University People's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Shu Wang, doctor

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Peking University People's Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Peking University People'S Hospital

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PKUPH10B002

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.