Computerized Cognitive Training in Neurodegenerative Diseases (NDD2019)

NCT ID: NCT04111640

Last Updated: 2019-10-01

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: UNKNOWN
• Clinical Phase: NA
• Total Enrollment: 40 participants
• Study Classification: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2017-03-15
• Study Completion Date: 2020-12-15

Brief Summary

The prevalence of neurodegenerative diseases is expected to increase over the next years, in parallel to the aging of the world population. Therefore, research efforts need to be devoted to evaluate intervention strategies that delay the onset of cognitive decline. Given the paucity of pharmacological interventions, strategies for non-pharmacological enhancement, such as cognitive training, are receiving increasing attention. Moreover, the advances in the development of Information & Communication Technologies (ICT) has recently prompted the possibility to develop computer-based solution, also called Serious Game (SG), for the training of one or more cognitive functions. This approach could help overcome the limits of traditional paper-and-pencil cognitive intervention techniques. However, the clinical, ethical, economic and research impact of the use of these computer-based solutions in these target populations is still under discussion. In order to acquire more academic and professional credibility and acceptance, researchers need to collect more data to test and evolve usability and usefulness of SG as clinical tools targeting people with dementia-related disorders.

The general aim of this research is to evaluate the effects of a computer-supported Cognitive Training (CT) compared to a paper-and-pencil CT, in the early stage of neurodegenerative diseases. Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) are enrolled and randomly assigned to the experimental group (CoRe software) or control group (paper-and-pencil CoRe version). All patients are evaluated before (T0) and after (T1) treatment with an exhaustive neuropsychological assessment. Furthermore, follow-up visits are scheduled 6 months (T2) and 12 months (T3) after the end of the treatment.

Detailed Description

Serious games (SG), are digital applications specialized for purpose other than entertaining. These technology devices could help to overcome the limits of traditional paper-and-pencil approaches. These traditional interventions, even if particular familiar to older patients, involve indeed some disadvantages, such as data management and analysis particularly complex for therapists; possible learning effects related to stimuli, boredom and reduction of the patient's compliance.

Conversely, SG uses motivational cues and provides real-time feedback; task complexity and response time demands may change frequently during and across sessions, in accordance with changes in individual performance. This allows to avoid over- or under-stimulation and to train areas of relative weakness. Computer support also saves time for therapists in the preparation of exercises and allows to record all session parameters for further statistics. Talking about disadvantages, the more critical is that elderly people might have poor information technology skills with a consequent lack of familiarity with technological devices. These difficulties derive from the fact that most of the SG used have been developed for entertainment purposes (e.g., the Nintendo Wii Fit, Wii Sports, and Big Brain Academy) and for a "typical healthy user" in mind. Some practical recommendations for the usability and usefulness of SG as clinical tools in dementia-related disorders were collected, but there is still no a general consensus about how, when and for what purpose these digital games should be developed. In fact, in the contest of neurodegenerative disease, cognitive intervention to be effective must be proportionate to the degree of cognitive deterioration and consequently it is necessary to take into account the phases of the disease, the specific disease characteristics and the specific cognitive domains affected. Some studies suggested that computerized CT is efficacious at the early phases of the disease, or where MCI is present, while it may not be beneficial at the dementia stage. Though these emerging results are encouraging, some issue about the use of this computer-based solution as clinical tools remain unresolved.

In this frame, we develop a computer-based CT (CoRe software) for the training of logical-executive and working-memory functions. We aim to assess the efficacy of this computer-supported CT compared to a paper-and-pencil CoRe version. This could be useful for two main reasons: 1) understand the comparability of the two interventions; 2) explore possible extra advantages of the CoRe software with respect to the paper-and-pencil version that could make it more suitable for the clinical routine.

CoRe is an ontology-based software tool that allows several degrees of personalization and the possibility to generate different patient-tailored exercises; for a more detailed description see previous papers.

Inpatients with idiopathic PD are recruited from the Neurorehabilitation Unit of the IRCCS Mondino Foundation. The diagnosis of mild dementia or PD-MCI is formulated on the basis of a comprehensive neuropsychological evaluation (baseline cognitive assessment - T0) according to the guidelines presented in the literature. The following standardized tests assessing different domains are used:

• global cognitive function: Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Montreal Montreal Overall Cognitive Assessment (MoCA);
• memory: verbal (Verbal Span; Digit Span) and spatial (Corsi's blocktapping test - CBTT) span; verbal long-term memory (Logical Memory Test immediate and delayed recall; Rey's 15-word test immediate and delayed recall); spatial long-term memory (Rey Complex Figure delayed recall - RCF-dr);
• logical-executive functions: non-verbal reasoning; frontal functionality (Frontal Assessment Battery - FAB); semantic fluency (animals, fruits, car brands), phonological fluency (FAS);
• attention: visual selective attention (Attentive Matrices); simple speed processing and complex attention (Trail Making Test parts A - TMT A and part B - TMT B);
• visuospatial abilities: constructive apraxia Rey Complex Figure copy - RCF-copy.

The same battery is also used at the post-training assessment (T1) and at the follow-up visits six months (T2) and one year after (T3). Parallel versions are applied when available (verbal long-term memory tests), in order to avoid the learning effect. All the test scores are corrected for age, sex, and education and compared with the values available for the Italian population.

At the baseline, the cognitive reserve is assessed using Cognitive Reserve Index questionnaire (CRIq). The patients' functional status is assessed using Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) at the baseline and at the last follow-up visit after one year (T3). Moreover, mood is assessed using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) at the baseline and at the follow-up visits (T1, T2 and T3), while quality of life is assessed using the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey questionnaire (SF-36) at the baseline and at the follow-up visits six months (T2) and one year (T3) after training.

This study is a prospective, double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial. All the patients recruited undergo baseline cognitive assessment (T0). Patients who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria are enrolled and randomly assigned to the experimental group (CoRe software) or control group (paper-and-pencil CoRe version). CT program consists of 12 individual sessions (3 sessions/week) each lasting 45 minutes of computer-based or paper-and-pencil logical-executive and working-memory tasks.

All the patients are evaluated at the end of the 3-weeks training (T1), to detect the training effect, and six month (T2) and one year (T3) after the end of CT to assess the persistence of the training-related improvement and also to evaluate the impact of CT on the evolution of cognitive decline.

Conditions

Mild Cognitive Impairment

Study Design

• Allocation Method: RANDOMIZED
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Primary Study Purpose: TREATMENT
• Blinding Strategy: DOUBLE

Study Groups

Experimental group

A computer-supported cognitive training for the training of logical-executive and working-memory functions (CoRe software)

Group Type: EXPERIMENTAL

Control Group

Intervention Type: OTHER

Paper and pencil cognitive training (paper-and-pencil CoRe version)

Control Group

Paper and pencil cognitive training (paper-and-pencil CoRe version)

Group Type: OTHER

CoRe software

Intervention Type: OTHER

Computer-supported cognitive training (CT)

Interventions

CoRe software

Computer-supported cognitive training (CT)

Intervention Type: OTHER

Control Group

Paper and pencil cognitive training (paper-and-pencil CoRe version)

Intervention Type: OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• diagnosis of idiopathic PD according to UKPDBB criteria (Hughes, Daniel, Kilford, & Lees, 1992) and Hoehn&Yahr scale≤4 (Hoehn & Yahr, 1967);
• presence of PD-MCI single-domain (executive) or PD-MCI multiple-domain with executive involvement (Litvan et al., 2012);
• age between 50 and 85 years;
• education level ≥5 years.

Exclusion Criteria

• pre-existing cognitive impairment (e.g. aphasia,neglect);
• severe disturbances in consciousness;
• severe sensory or motor disturbances that do not allow the patient to control the trunk or to maintain the sitting position; in particular patients with disturbing resting and/or action tremor (corresponding to score 2-4 in the specific items of Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS III) (Fahn,1987) were excluded;
• concomitant severe psychiatric or neurological conditions;
• patients with Deep Brain Stimulation.

• Minimum Eligible Age: 50 Years
• Maximum Eligible Age: 85 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Sponsors

IRCCS National Neurological Institute "C. Mondino" Foundation

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Responsibility Role: SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Elena Sinforiani, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia

Locations

Struttura Semplice Neuropsicologia Clinica/ Centro UVA

Pavia, , Italy

Site Status: RECRUITING

Countries

Italy

Central Contacts

Cinzia Fattore, MD

Role: CONTACT

cinzia.fattore@mondino.it

0039 0382 380385

Facility Contacts

Sara Bottiroli, Psychologist

Role: primary

sara.bottiroli@mondino.it

0382380290

References

Mayeux R, Stern Y. Epidemiology of Alzheimer disease. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2012 Aug 1;2(8):a006239. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a006239.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 22908189 (View on PubMed)

Belleville S. Cognitive training for persons with mild cognitive impairment. Int Psychogeriatr. 2008 Feb;20(1):57-66. doi: 10.1017/S104161020700631X. Epub 2007 Oct 25.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 17958927 (View on PubMed)

Jean L, Bergeron ME, Thivierge S, Simard M. Cognitive intervention programs for individuals with mild cognitive impairment: systematic review of the literature. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2010 Apr;18(4):281-96. doi: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e3181c37ce9.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 20220584 (View on PubMed)

Robert PH, Konig A, Amieva H, Andrieu S, Bremond F, Bullock R, Ceccaldi M, Dubois B, Gauthier S, Kenigsberg PA, Nave S, Orgogozo JM, Piano J, Benoit M, Touchon J, Vellas B, Yesavage J, Manera V. Recommendations for the use of Serious Games in people with Alzheimer's Disease, related disorders and frailty. Front Aging Neurosci. 2014 Mar 24;6:54. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2014.00054. eCollection 2014.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 24715864 (View on PubMed)

Walton CC, Naismith SL, Lampit A, Mowszowski L, Lewis SJ. Cognitive Training in Parkinson's Disease. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017 Mar;31(3):207-216. doi: 10.1177/1545968316680489. Epub 2016 Dec 13.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 27899737 (View on PubMed)

Coyle H, Traynor V, Solowij N. Computerized and virtual reality cognitive training for individuals at high risk of cognitive decline: systematic review of the literature. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2015 Apr;23(4):335-359. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2014.04.009. Epub 2014 May 14.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 24998488 (View on PubMed)

Bernini S, Alloni A, Panzarasa S, Picascia M, Quaglini S, Tassorelli C, Sinforiani E. A computer-based cognitive training in Mild Cognitive Impairment in Parkinson's Disease. NeuroRehabilitation. 2019;44(4):555-567. doi: 10.3233/NRE-192714.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 31256092 (View on PubMed)

Alloni A, Quaglini S, Panzarasa S, Sinforiani E, Bernini S. Evaluation of an ontology-based system for computerized cognitive rehabilitation. Int J Med Inform. 2018 Jul;115:64-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.04.005. Epub 2018 Apr 21.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 29779721 (View on PubMed)

Alloni A, Sinforiani E, Zucchella C, Sandrini G, Bernini S, Cattani B, Pardell DT, Quaglini S, Pistarini C. Computer-based cognitive rehabilitation: the CoRe system. Disabil Rehabil. 2017 Feb;39(4):407-417. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1096969. Epub 2015 Oct 27.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 26505323 (View on PubMed)

Bernini S, Panzarasa S, Barbieri M, Sinforiani E, Quaglini S, Tassorelli C, Bottiroli S. A double-blind randomized controlled trial of the efficacy of cognitive training delivered using two different methods in mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease: preliminary report of benefits associated with the use of a computerized tool. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2021 Jun;33(6):1567-1575. doi: 10.1007/s40520-020-01665-2. Epub 2020 Sep 8.

Reference Type: DERIVED

PMID: 32895890 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

NDD2019

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id