Non-invasive Brain Stimulation and Strategic Memory Training

NCT ID: NCT05929872

Last Updated: 2023-07-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

56 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-07-30

Study Completion Date

2026-12-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Physiological aging is often associated with memory function decline. Recently, the use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a type of non-invasive brain stimulation, has been combined with adaptive working memory training interventions in healthy older adults, providing evidence for a significant improvement in memory functions. To the best of our knowledge, no study addressed the use of strategic memory training coupled with the use of tDCS in normal aging. Strategic memory trainings allow to improve participants' performance in the practiced task and to generalize the use of memory strategies to new materials. This Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a combined intervention associating strategic memory training with the use of tDCS. Healthy older adults and participants with subjective cognitive decline will be recruited and randomly assigned to the experimental group (strategic memory training + ACTIVE tDCS) or the control group (strategic memory training + SHAM tDCS). All participants will be evaluated on transfer and practiced tasks before (T0) and after (T1) the treatment and during follow-up visits, scheduled at 1 month (T2) and 3 months (T3) after the intervention.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The use of cognitive functions such as memory is essential for the execution of daily activities and represents a crucial element for autonomy maintenance during aging. It is known that the physiological cognitive decline associated with aging also involves memory and can significantly impact the older person's independence. For these reasons, great interest has been generated by two tools that have proved to be decisive in supporting memory functions: non-invasive neurostimulation and memory training. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a form of noninvasive brain stimulation that modulates brain activity by employing a direct current delivered through electrodes applied to the scalp. Recently, the use of tDCS has been combined with training interventions focused on working memory in healthy older adults, providing evidence of a significant improvement in memory function when memory training is associated with the use of tDCS compared to when it is performed without it. In particular, adaptive memory trainings coupled with stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex provide benefits that last also at follow-up visits after 1 or 3 months, especially in participants who exhibit a lower baseline performance.

While it was observed that adaptive working memory training alone is unable to modulate brain plasticity mechanisms, it was hypothesized that tDCS can modulate brain plasticity by acting through long-term potentiation (LTP) mechanisms and that it can modulate brain neurotrophic factor (BDNF), a protein that plays a relevant role in LTP.

Several adaptive memory trainings focused on working memory, which is essential for decision-making processes and daily activities.

Even if promising results have been shown so far, it appears that no study addressed the implementation of strategic memory training coupled with the use of tDCS. Adaptive trainings allow improving the performance in each task by gradually increasing its difficulty, without however resorting to teaching a strategy. Strategic memory trainings permit not only to improve participants' performance in the practiced task but also to generalize the use of memory strategies to new tasks.

Intending to prevent cognitive impairment, using these intervention methods in healthy aging and the prodromal phases can be useful. To this end, subjective cognitive decline (SCD) indeed represents an intermediate state between normal cognition and mild cognitive impairment (nMCD) and may predict the development of objective cognitive decline.

In this frame, the primary goal of this double-blind randomized controlled trial is to assess whether the application of transcranial direct current stimulation during strategic memory training (on-line neurostimulation) enhances the effect of strategic memory training. The follow-up visits allow for investigating whether eventual improvements are preserved over time and if this combined intervention affects the evolution of cognitive decline.

The treatment protocol consists of 5 sessions (2/3 session/week, 1 hour/day) of strategic memory training combined with on-line tDCS (anodic tDCS, 2mA for 20 minutes, versus sham tDCS, applied to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex - DLPFC).

Healthy old participants will be recruited from the general population. Participants with subjective cognitive decline (SCD) are recruited from Neuropsychology/Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Unit and Neurorehabilitation Unit of IRCCS Mondino Foundation. The diagnosis of SCD is formulated based on a comprehensive neuropsychological evaluation (baseline cognitive assessment - T0) according to the guidelines presented in the literature.

At T0, the following standardized tests are used:

* Global cognitive function is assessed using Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE);
* Cognitive reserve is assessed using Cognitive Reserve Index Questionnaire (CRIq);
* Mood is assessed using Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS).

At T0, practiced and not practiced memory tasks (Bottiroli et al., 2013) will be administered to the participants as pre-tests:

1. Associative learning;
2. List learning;
3. Name-face learning;
4. Place learning;
5. Text learning;
6. Grocery learning;

Participants who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria are enrolled and randomly assigned to the experimental group (strategic memory training + ACTIVE tDCS) or control group (strategic memory training + SHAM tDCS).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cognitive Decline Healthy Aging

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled study
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators
Double

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Experimental group

The experimental group receives strategic memory training plus non-invasive brain stimulation (ACTIVE tDCS).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Non-invasive brain stimulation

Intervention Type OTHER

ACTIVE transcranial direct current stimulation( tDCS)

Control Group

The control group receives strategic memory training plus sham non-invasive brain stimulation (SHAM tDCS).

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Sham non-invasive brain stimulation

Intervention Type OTHER

SHAM tDCS

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Non-invasive brain stimulation

ACTIVE transcranial direct current stimulation( tDCS)

Intervention Type OTHER

Sham non-invasive brain stimulation

SHAM tDCS

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* MMSE ≥ 24.
* GDS \< e uguale 11.
* Age between 65 and 85 years.
* Educational level ≥ 5 years.

Exclusion Criteria

* Pre-existing cognitive impairment (e.g. aphasia, neglect).
* Dementia.
* Severe disturbances in consciousness.
* Concomitant severe psychiatric disease or other neurological conditions (e.g. depression and behavioral disorders).
* Motor or sensory diseases that may interfere with test execution or strategic memory training.
Minimum Eligible Age

65 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Pavia

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

IRCCS National Neurological Institute "C. Mondino" Foundation

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Stefano Cappa, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Dementia Research Center

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Sara Bottiroli, Dc.

Role: CONTACT

+39 0382 380201

Cinzia Fattore, MD

Role: CONTACT

+39 0382 380385

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Antonenko D, Thams F, Grittner U, Uhrich J, Glockner F, Li SC, Floel A. Randomized trial of cognitive training and brain stimulation in non-demented older adults. Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2022 Feb 23;8(1):e12262. doi: 10.1002/trc2.12262. eCollection 2022.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35229023 (View on PubMed)

Assecondi S, Hu R, Kroeker J, Eskes G, Shapiro K. Older adults with lower working memory capacity benefit from transcranial direct current stimulation when combined with working memory training: A preliminary study. Front Aging Neurosci. 2022 Oct 10;14:1009262. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.1009262. eCollection 2022.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 36299611 (View on PubMed)

Bottiroli S, Cavallini E, Dunlosky J, Vecchi T, Hertzog C. The importance of training strategy adaptation: a learner-oriented approach for improving older adults' memory and transfer. J Exp Psychol Appl. 2013 Sep;19(3):205-18. doi: 10.1037/a0034078. Epub 2013 Aug 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23978160 (View on PubMed)

Grady C. The cognitive neuroscience of ageing. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2012 Jun 20;13(7):491-505. doi: 10.1038/nrn3256.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22714020 (View on PubMed)

Kane MJ, Engle RW. Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: the contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2003 Mar;132(1):47-70. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.132.1.47.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12656297 (View on PubMed)

Lu H, Cheng PL, Lim BK, Khoshnevisrad N, Poo MM. Elevated BDNF after cocaine withdrawal facilitates LTP in medial prefrontal cortex by suppressing GABA inhibition. Neuron. 2010 Sep 9;67(5):821-33. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.08.012.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20826313 (View on PubMed)

Park DC, Lautenschlager G, Hedden T, Davidson NS, Smith AD, Smith PK. Models of visuospatial and verbal memory across the adult life span. Psychol Aging. 2002 Jun;17(2):299-320.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12061414 (View on PubMed)

Pergher V, Au J, Alizadeh Shalchy M, Santarnecchi E, Seitz A, Jaeggi SM, Battelli L. The benefits of simultaneous tDCS and working memory training on transfer outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Brain Stimul. 2022 Nov-Dec;15(6):1541-1551. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2022.11.008. Epub 2022 Nov 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 36460294 (View on PubMed)

Reisberg B, Shulman MB. Commentary on "a roadmap for the prevention of dementia II: Leon Thal Symposium 2008." Subjective cognitive impairment as an antecedent of Alzheimer's dementia: policy import. Alzheimers Dement. 2009 Mar;5(2):154-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2009.01.011. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19328449 (View on PubMed)

Ripp I, Emch M, Wu Q, Lizarraga A, Udale R, von Bastian CC, Koch K, Yakushev I. Adaptive working memory training does not produce transfer effects in cognition and neuroimaging. Transl Psychiatry. 2022 Dec 13;12(1):512. doi: 10.1038/s41398-022-02272-7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 36513642 (View on PubMed)

Teixeira-Santos AC, Moreira CS, Pereira DR, Pinal D, Fregni F, Leite J, Carvalho S, Sampaio A. Working Memory Training Coupled With Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Experiment. Front Aging Neurosci. 2022 Apr 12;14:827188. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.827188. eCollection 2022.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35493937 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

StMe-tDCS2023

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

MI Practice and tDCS With Aging
NCT02813291 COMPLETED NA
Noninvasive Brain Stimulation for pAD
NCT05468268 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Cognitive Stimulation Study
NCT02067689 COMPLETED NA
Neuromodulation of Memory in Aging
NCT05460468 RECRUITING NA