Non-invasive Brain Stimulation and Strategic Memory Training
NCT ID: NCT05929872
Last Updated: 2023-07-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
56 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-07-30
2026-12-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Noninvasive Brain Stimulation to Enhance Cognitive Training in Older Adults
NCT04050046
Novel, Individualized Brain Stimulation, Network-based Approaches to Improve Cognition
NCT04986787
tDCS-enhanced Working Memory Training in Subjective Cognitive Decline
NCT03236454
tDCS and Cognitive Efficiency in Ageing
NCT05216315
TDCS to Improve Motivation and Memory in Elderly (TIME)
NCT04268186
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
While it was observed that adaptive working memory training alone is unable to modulate brain plasticity mechanisms, it was hypothesized that tDCS can modulate brain plasticity by acting through long-term potentiation (LTP) mechanisms and that it can modulate brain neurotrophic factor (BDNF), a protein that plays a relevant role in LTP.
Several adaptive memory trainings focused on working memory, which is essential for decision-making processes and daily activities.
Even if promising results have been shown so far, it appears that no study addressed the implementation of strategic memory training coupled with the use of tDCS. Adaptive trainings allow improving the performance in each task by gradually increasing its difficulty, without however resorting to teaching a strategy. Strategic memory trainings permit not only to improve participants' performance in the practiced task but also to generalize the use of memory strategies to new tasks.
Intending to prevent cognitive impairment, using these intervention methods in healthy aging and the prodromal phases can be useful. To this end, subjective cognitive decline (SCD) indeed represents an intermediate state between normal cognition and mild cognitive impairment (nMCD) and may predict the development of objective cognitive decline.
In this frame, the primary goal of this double-blind randomized controlled trial is to assess whether the application of transcranial direct current stimulation during strategic memory training (on-line neurostimulation) enhances the effect of strategic memory training. The follow-up visits allow for investigating whether eventual improvements are preserved over time and if this combined intervention affects the evolution of cognitive decline.
The treatment protocol consists of 5 sessions (2/3 session/week, 1 hour/day) of strategic memory training combined with on-line tDCS (anodic tDCS, 2mA for 20 minutes, versus sham tDCS, applied to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex - DLPFC).
Healthy old participants will be recruited from the general population. Participants with subjective cognitive decline (SCD) are recruited from Neuropsychology/Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Unit and Neurorehabilitation Unit of IRCCS Mondino Foundation. The diagnosis of SCD is formulated based on a comprehensive neuropsychological evaluation (baseline cognitive assessment - T0) according to the guidelines presented in the literature.
At T0, the following standardized tests are used:
* Global cognitive function is assessed using Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE);
* Cognitive reserve is assessed using Cognitive Reserve Index Questionnaire (CRIq);
* Mood is assessed using Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS).
At T0, practiced and not practiced memory tasks (Bottiroli et al., 2013) will be administered to the participants as pre-tests:
1. Associative learning;
2. List learning;
3. Name-face learning;
4. Place learning;
5. Text learning;
6. Grocery learning;
Participants who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria are enrolled and randomly assigned to the experimental group (strategic memory training + ACTIVE tDCS) or control group (strategic memory training + SHAM tDCS).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Experimental group
The experimental group receives strategic memory training plus non-invasive brain stimulation (ACTIVE tDCS).
Non-invasive brain stimulation
ACTIVE transcranial direct current stimulation( tDCS)
Control Group
The control group receives strategic memory training plus sham non-invasive brain stimulation (SHAM tDCS).
Sham non-invasive brain stimulation
SHAM tDCS
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Non-invasive brain stimulation
ACTIVE transcranial direct current stimulation( tDCS)
Sham non-invasive brain stimulation
SHAM tDCS
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* GDS \< e uguale 11.
* Age between 65 and 85 years.
* Educational level ≥ 5 years.
Exclusion Criteria
* Dementia.
* Severe disturbances in consciousness.
* Concomitant severe psychiatric disease or other neurological conditions (e.g. depression and behavioral disorders).
* Motor or sensory diseases that may interfere with test execution or strategic memory training.
65 Years
85 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Pavia
OTHER
IRCCS National Neurological Institute "C. Mondino" Foundation
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Stefano Cappa, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Dementia Research Center
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Antonenko D, Thams F, Grittner U, Uhrich J, Glockner F, Li SC, Floel A. Randomized trial of cognitive training and brain stimulation in non-demented older adults. Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2022 Feb 23;8(1):e12262. doi: 10.1002/trc2.12262. eCollection 2022.
Assecondi S, Hu R, Kroeker J, Eskes G, Shapiro K. Older adults with lower working memory capacity benefit from transcranial direct current stimulation when combined with working memory training: A preliminary study. Front Aging Neurosci. 2022 Oct 10;14:1009262. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.1009262. eCollection 2022.
Bottiroli S, Cavallini E, Dunlosky J, Vecchi T, Hertzog C. The importance of training strategy adaptation: a learner-oriented approach for improving older adults' memory and transfer. J Exp Psychol Appl. 2013 Sep;19(3):205-18. doi: 10.1037/a0034078. Epub 2013 Aug 26.
Grady C. The cognitive neuroscience of ageing. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2012 Jun 20;13(7):491-505. doi: 10.1038/nrn3256.
Kane MJ, Engle RW. Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: the contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2003 Mar;132(1):47-70. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.132.1.47.
Lu H, Cheng PL, Lim BK, Khoshnevisrad N, Poo MM. Elevated BDNF after cocaine withdrawal facilitates LTP in medial prefrontal cortex by suppressing GABA inhibition. Neuron. 2010 Sep 9;67(5):821-33. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.08.012.
Park DC, Lautenschlager G, Hedden T, Davidson NS, Smith AD, Smith PK. Models of visuospatial and verbal memory across the adult life span. Psychol Aging. 2002 Jun;17(2):299-320.
Pergher V, Au J, Alizadeh Shalchy M, Santarnecchi E, Seitz A, Jaeggi SM, Battelli L. The benefits of simultaneous tDCS and working memory training on transfer outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Brain Stimul. 2022 Nov-Dec;15(6):1541-1551. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2022.11.008. Epub 2022 Nov 29.
Reisberg B, Shulman MB. Commentary on "a roadmap for the prevention of dementia II: Leon Thal Symposium 2008." Subjective cognitive impairment as an antecedent of Alzheimer's dementia: policy import. Alzheimers Dement. 2009 Mar;5(2):154-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2009.01.011. No abstract available.
Ripp I, Emch M, Wu Q, Lizarraga A, Udale R, von Bastian CC, Koch K, Yakushev I. Adaptive working memory training does not produce transfer effects in cognition and neuroimaging. Transl Psychiatry. 2022 Dec 13;12(1):512. doi: 10.1038/s41398-022-02272-7.
Teixeira-Santos AC, Moreira CS, Pereira DR, Pinal D, Fregni F, Leite J, Carvalho S, Sampaio A. Working Memory Training Coupled With Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Experiment. Front Aging Neurosci. 2022 Apr 12;14:827188. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.827188. eCollection 2022.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
StMe-tDCS2023
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.