Pre-therapeutic MRI Assessment of Early-Stage Rectal Cancer and Significant Rectal Polyps to Avoid Major Resectional Surgery

NCT ID: NCT04103372

Last Updated: 2024-11-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

200 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-09-01

Study Completion Date

2031-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

When a patient is diagnosed with a rectal (bowel) polyp or cancer, radiology doctors read MRI scans to describe how deeply the cancer invades into the bowel wall (this is the 'stage' of the cancer). In this project, we will teach radiologists to find more early-stage rectal cancers. These are cancers that have only grown partially into the bowel wall. If we succeed, more patients could have these lesions removed by a local procedure that preserves the bowel and avoids the risks and complications of major surgery.

We have developed a new method for radiology doctors to read MRI scans, which is more accurate than current practice. Currently only 3/10 of early rectal cancers are found by radiologists but by using our MRI reading system, 9/10 patients can be accurately identified as having early rectal cancer. We have proven that we can teach this method to other radiology doctors whose reports help to accurately inform patients of all possible treatment options, so they can be offered the option of a local procedure.

In this initial work we will train radiology doctors in our MRI reading method in 20 hospitals. We will compare MRI reports before and after training to see if an accurate reading method improves treatments choices for patients. We will also determine whether more patients have local procedures after our training. The results of this initial work will help us to apply for national funding for a trial that we can quickly roll out to all NHS hospitals.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Many patients diagnosed with Early Rectal Cancer (ERC) are currently over-treated. Most patients with confirmed ERC will undergo an MRI, but some are not correctly identified in endoscopy and immediately removed. Of those who undergo MRI, 69% are over-staged and undergo major surgery or unnecessary radiotherapy when local excision surgery to preserve the patients rectum, and quality of life, would have been possible. \<10% of patients with ERC are staged accurately and offered local excision, with the majority who are staged as ERC on MRI still undergoing major surgery, likely due to uncertainty in the staging report.

Prof Gina Brown developed a more accurate radiological staging system (PRESERVE) or ERC, whereby T2 tumours are identified and classified according to the degree of preservation of the individual layers of the rectal wall. It has been shown that PRESERVE enabled better identification of ERC suitable for local excision from the expected 30% to 89% accuracy. This improved accuracy was replicated in a further study by training a cohort of 12 radiologists. It is predicted that wider adoption of PRESERVE will result in increased organ-preserving surgery from the current rates of 10% to \>50%.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Rectal Cancer Colo-rectal Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Multicentre, stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial. This pilot study will run for 9 months and utilise a stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial design (including transition period). Sites will enter data from the diagnostic and treatment pathways of all rectal cancer patients who are eligible for primary surgical treatment, eg those radiologically staged as less than or equal to T3b or with confirmed as less than or equal to pT2N0 pathological staging.

Prior to the trial opening the participating sites will be randomly allocated a number, which will determine the number of months the site will remain in the control and then subsequently the intervention phase of the trial.
Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control Arm Schedule

All sites will begin in the Control arm, with patients recruited to the Control Arm Schedule. Clinical investigations prior to treatment, during treatment, after surgery and during further treatment should be performed as per standard clinical practice and as clinically indicated. Each site will transition to the Intervention arm at a month prescribed by their randomised cluster, and from that point patients are recruited to the Intervention Arm Schedule . Patients will be recruited to either the Control or Intervention arms dependent on which arm is in progress at the site at the time of recruitment. There will be no crossover of patients between the arms at any point.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Intervention Arm Schedule

Each site will transition to the Intervention arm at a month prescribed by their randomised cluster, and from that point patients are recruited to the Intervention Arm Schedule . The transition period lasts one month during which recruitment is halted and two interventions implemented:

1. MRI scans will be recommended for all rectal polyps ≥20mm in size, or with other features suspicious of malignancy, prior to removal. This is designed to reduce the numbers of Early Rectal Cancers missed in endoscopy.
2. Radiologist training in the use of the PRESERVE mrSRT for suspected Early Rectal Cancer.

Patients will be recruited to either the Control or Intervention arms dependent on which arm is in progress at the site at the time of recruitment. There will be no crossover of patients between the arms at any point.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

MRI scan

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

MRI scans will be recommended for all rectal polyps ≥20mm in size, or with other features suspicious of malignancy, prior to removal. This is designed to reduce the numbers of Early Rectal Cancers missed in endoscopy.

Radiologist training

Intervention Type OTHER

Radiologist training in the use of the PRESERVE mrSRT for suspected Early Rectal Cancer.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

MRI scan

MRI scans will be recommended for all rectal polyps ≥20mm in size, or with other features suspicious of malignancy, prior to removal. This is designed to reduce the numbers of Early Rectal Cancers missed in endoscopy.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Radiologist training

Radiologist training in the use of the PRESERVE mrSRT for suspected Early Rectal Cancer.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Have a rectal tumour or suspected tumour less than or equal to T3b on MRI stage or pT2 or less after excision, or 20mm or more on endoscopy with suspicion of malignancy
2. Be aged 16 years or over

Exclusion Criteria

1. Have metastatic disease at time of initial staging
2. Have a biopsy-proven rectal malignancy which is not adenocarcinoma
3. Are contraindicated for MRI
Minimum Eligible Age

16 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

100 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Pelican Cancer Foundation

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

RM Partners West London Cancer Alliance

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Imperial College London

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Gina Brown, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Imperial College London

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Royal Berkshire Hospital

Reading, Berkshire, United Kingdom

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Buckinghamshire Healthcare Nhs Trust

Amersham, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom

Site Status RECRUITING

University College London Hospitals Nhs Foundation Trust

London, Greater London, United Kingdom

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

King'S College Hospital Nhs Foundation Trust

London, Greater London, United Kingdom

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

West Middlesex Hospital

London, Greater London, United Kingdom

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Imperial College Healthcare Nhs Trus

London, Greater London, United Kingdom

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

The Hillingdon Hospitals Nhs Foundation Trust

Uxbridge, Greater London, United Kingdom

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Hampshire Hospitals Nhs Foundation Trust

Basingstoke, Hampshire, United Kingdom

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Southampton General Hospital

Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Kent & Canterbury Hospital

Canterbury, KENT, United Kingdom

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Maidstone Hospital

Maidstone, KENT, United Kingdom

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Westmorland General Hospital

Kendal, Lancashire, United Kingdom

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Leicester Royal Infirmary

Leicester, Leicestershire, United Kingdom

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

St George'S Hospital

Tooting, London, United Kingdom

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

John Radcliffe Hospital

Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Nhs Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent Integrated Care Board

Stafford, Staffordshire, United Kingdom

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Frimley Health Nhs Foundation Trust

Camberley, Surrey, United Kingdom

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

St Helier Hospital

Carshalton, Surrey, United Kingdom

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Kingston Hospital Nhs Foundation Trust

Kingston upon Thames, Surrey, United Kingdom

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Croydon Health Services Nhs Trust

Thornton Heath, Surrey, United Kingdom

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Tonna Hospital

Swansea, Wales, United Kingdom

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Salisbury District Hospital

Salisbury, Wiltshire, United Kingdom

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

St Marks Bowel Cancer Screening Centre

Harrow, , United Kingdom

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Caroline Martin

Role: CONTACT

+44 (0) 7749 655 817

Syvella Ellis

Role: CONTACT

+44 (0) 7732 315 234

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Principal Investigator

Role: primary

Principal Investigator

Role: primary

Principal Investigator

Role: primary

Principal Investigator

Role: primary

Principal Investigator

Role: primary

Principal Investigator

Role: primary

Principal Investigator

Role: primary

Principal Investigator

Role: primary

Principal Investigator

Role: primary

Principal Investigator

Role: primary

Principal Investigator

Role: primary

Principal Investigator

Role: primary

Principal Investigator

Role: primary

Principal Investigator

Role: primary

Principal Investigator

Role: primary

Principal Investigator

Role: primary

Principal Investigator

Role: primary

Principal Investigator

Role: primary

Principal Investigator

Role: primary

Principal Investigator

Role: primary

Principal Investigator

Role: primary

Principal Investigator

Role: primary

Principal Investigator

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Detering R, van Oostendorp SE, Meyer VM, van Dieren S, Bos ACRK, Dekker JWT, Reerink O, van Waesberghe JHTM, Marijnen CAM, Moons LMG, Beets-Tan RGH, Hompes R, van Westreenen HL, Tanis PJ, Tuynman JB; Dutch ColoRectal Audit Group*. MRI cT1-2 rectal cancer staging accuracy: a population-based study. Br J Surg. 2020 Sep;107(10):1372-1382. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11590. Epub 2020 Apr 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32297326 (View on PubMed)

Balyasnikova S, Read J, Wotherspoon A, Rasheed S, Tekkis P, Tait D, Cunningham D, Brown G. Diagnostic accuracy of high-resolution MRI as a method to predict potentially safe endoscopic and surgical planes in patients with early rectal cancer. BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2017 Aug 14;4(1):e000151. doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2017-000151. eCollection 2017.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29259791 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

https://www.nboca.org.uk/content/uploads/2023/01/NBOCA-2022-Final.pdf

National Bowel Cancer Audit. Annual Report 2022 \[Internet\]. Leeds: NBOCA; 2022

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

DOCUMAS 24HH8769

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Radiomics in Rectal Cancer
NCT05331040 UNKNOWN