PET on Surgery for Loco-regionally Recurrent Colorectal Cancer

NCT ID: NCT05924282

Last Updated: 2023-07-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

193 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-07-01

Study Completion Date

2023-06-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The influence of Positron-Emission-Tomography (PET) on the surgical treatment of loco-regionally recurrent colorectal cancer (LRRCRC) remains obscure and deserves further investigation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Loco-regionally recurrent colorectal cancer (LRRCRC) occurs in 4.0-11.5% of patients following treatment of primary colorectal cancer with curative intent, and can be categorized as peri-anastomotic, mesenteric/paracolic (nodal), retroperitoneal and peritoneal.1-4 In contrast to distant recurrences (e.g. liver, lung or bone metastasis), LRRCRCs is a less recognized clinical entity, although it is generally accepted that surgical resection remains the major treatment modality to provide the long-term survival for such patients.5-7 However, the value of resection for LRRCRC is obscure, given the role of surgical resection in treating LRRCRC has received comparatively little attention with a scant literature to draw upon when making treatment recommendations and no available consensus statements.8,9 Moreover, in clinical practice, it has been recognized that more than 50% of patients with recurrent colorectal cancer brought to the operating room for attempted curative surgery were unable to undergo the planned operation because more extensive disease than anticipated was discovered at laparotomy. Therefore, it has been suggested that a formal multidisciplinary team (MDT) discussion based on more precise diagnostic armamentariums be mandatory for more accurate evaluation of tumor burden and would allow curative surgery to be offered to a better-selected group of patients with recurrent colorectal malignancy10-14.

Remarkably, Positron-Emission-Tomography (PET) scans are now being widely used for the surveillance of patients having undergone curative resection for the primary colorectal cancer . Whole-body PET scanning in the patient with recurrent colorectal cancer has been reported to be more sensitive and accurate than Computed-Tomography (CT) and Magnetic-Resonance-Imaging (MRI). Moreover, PET is purported to be capable of differentiating among recurrent malignancy, scar, fibrosis, and necrosis, thus preventing the patients from futile surgery.15 With the above-mentioned reasons in mind, we then conducted this retrospective study to look at the efficacy of PET scan for directing surgery in patients with LRRCRC. We hypothesized that with the better diagnostic sensitivity and specificity, as compared to the conventional imaging methods (CT/MRI) in detecting recurrences of colorectal cancer, PET can positively affect the surgical decision-making and thus improve the treatment outcomes for patients with LRRCRCs.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

PET-driven Surgery Loco-regional Recurrent Colorectal Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Sole PET group

Tumor recurrence was detected solely by PET; the surgery was performed and the extent of the resection was guided by the PET.

Curative intent surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Curative intent surgery means that surgeons intend to perform R0 resection.

Combined CT/MRI plus PET group

Tumor recurrence was detected by computed tomography (CT) / magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and PET; the surgery was performed and the extent of the resection was guided by the CT/MRI+PET.

Curative intent surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Curative intent surgery means that surgeons intend to perform R0 resection.

Control group

Tumor recurrence was detected but no surgery was performed.

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Curative intent surgery

Curative intent surgery means that surgeons intend to perform R0 resection.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

i. patients with primary colorectal cancers undergoing R0 resection ii. Patients with final histopathologic reports documenting the pathologic Tumor-Node-Metastasis (pTNM) stage I, II, or III

Exclusion Criteria

i. Patients with pTNM stage IV primary colorectal cancer ii. Patients with R1/2 resection
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Taiwan University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jin-Tung LIANG, MD,PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

National Taiwan University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

National Taiwan University Hospital

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Taiwan

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

202305096RINA

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.