Clinical Relevance of Major Pathologic Regression for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
NCT ID: NCT06879197
Last Updated: 2025-03-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
1187 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2016-04-30
2023-03-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Clinical Relevance of Pathologic Regression IN Lymph Node for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
NCT06883084
Preoperative (Chemo)Radiotherapy for Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer
NCT06617052
Randomized Controlled Study on Optimize Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
NCT02031939
Assessment of Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Therapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
NCT06314737
Outcomes of Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Cancer in a Tertiary Asian Institute
NCT05607186
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Study Design and Objectives
Primary Objective:
To evaluate the clinical significance of Major Pathologic Regression (MPR) in LARC patients following NCRT. MPR is defined as ≤10% residual viable tumor within the tumor bed in the pathologic evaluation. The study will correlate MPR status with long-term survival outcomes, including Progression-Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS), to determine its validity as a surrogate endpoint for treatment efficacy.
Secondary Objectives:
To compare the efficacy of different NCRT regimens (e.g., fluoropyrimidine-based vs. oxaliplatin-containing protocols) in achieving MPR and improving survival outcomes.
To assess the prognostic value of novel histopathologic parameters, such as tumor necrosis density (NECR-TD), tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TLS) density, and TLS-to-necrosis ratio (T/NR), in predicting DFS and OS.
Study Population
Inclusion Criteria:
Adults (≥18 years) diagnosed with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma (clinical stage II-III).
Completion of NCRT followed by curative-intent surgery. Availability of pre- and post-treatment histopathologic data, including standardized regression grading and digitized whole-slide images (WSIs).
Exclusion Criteria:
Metastatic disease at diagnosis. Incomplete clinical or pathologic records. Data Collection and Variables
Clinical Data:
Demographics, tumor stage ( ypTNM), NCRT regimen, surgical approach, recurrence, and survival outcomes.
Pathologic Data:
Regression Grading: Residual viable tumor percentage, necrosis extent, and lymph node regression (ypN-Reg+/-).
Quantitative Digital Pathology: AI-driven analysis of WSIs to compute NECR-TD, TLS-TD, and T/NR (Figure 1).
Follow-Up:
PFS and OS will be tracked for a minimum of 3 years post-surgery. Statistical Analysis
Survival Analysis:
Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models will assess associations between MPR, histopathologic parameters, and survival outcomes.
Comparative Analysis:
Subgroup analyses will compare outcomes across NCRT regimens and LARC subtypes (e.g., mucinous vs. adenocarcinoma).
Machine Learning:
Prognostic models integrating clinical and histopathologic variables will be developed to predict DFS/OS.
Ethical Considerations The Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) of all participating centers have approved the study protocol.
Patient data will be anonymized, and informed consent will be waived for retrospective cohorts but obtained prospectively.
Innovation and Impact
This study addresses critical gaps in the prognostication of LARC by:
Validating MPR as a standardized endpoint for NCRT efficacy. Introducing quantitative, AI-driven histopathologic biomarkers (e.g., T/NR) to refine risk stratification.
Providing evidence for optimizing NCRT regimens based on tumor biology and regression patterns.
Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and clinical guidelines to improve personalized treatment strategies for LARC.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Completion of NCRT followed by curative-intent surgery. Availability of pre- and post-treatment histopathologic data, including standardized regression grading and digitized whole-slide images (WSIs).
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Yanhong Deng
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Yanhong Deng
M.D.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
GIH-SYSUyip33
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.