Clinical Relevance of Major Pathologic Regression for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

NCT ID: NCT06879197

Last Updated: 2025-03-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

1187 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-04-30

Study Completion Date

2023-03-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

We evaluated all related clinical and pathologic data of patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer following Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy, including the pathologic regression grading, and other histopathologic characteristics. Finally, the present study was aimed at (1) clarifying the clinical significance of the Major Pathologic Regression for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer following Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer and (2) comparing different Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy treatments of this uncommon disease through conducting a large, multi-center cohort study.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This large-scale, multi-center cohort study aims to investigate the clinical and prognostic implications of histopathologic characteristics in patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer (LARC) following Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy (NCRT). The study will retrospectively and prospectively analyze data from consecutive LARC patients treated at participating institutions between 2016 and 2022.

Study Design and Objectives

Primary Objective:

To evaluate the clinical significance of Major Pathologic Regression (MPR) in LARC patients following NCRT. MPR is defined as ≤10% residual viable tumor within the tumor bed in the pathologic evaluation. The study will correlate MPR status with long-term survival outcomes, including Progression-Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS), to determine its validity as a surrogate endpoint for treatment efficacy.

Secondary Objectives:

To compare the efficacy of different NCRT regimens (e.g., fluoropyrimidine-based vs. oxaliplatin-containing protocols) in achieving MPR and improving survival outcomes.

To assess the prognostic value of novel histopathologic parameters, such as tumor necrosis density (NECR-TD), tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TLS) density, and TLS-to-necrosis ratio (T/NR), in predicting DFS and OS.

Study Population

Inclusion Criteria:

Adults (≥18 years) diagnosed with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma (clinical stage II-III).

Completion of NCRT followed by curative-intent surgery. Availability of pre- and post-treatment histopathologic data, including standardized regression grading and digitized whole-slide images (WSIs).

Exclusion Criteria:

Metastatic disease at diagnosis. Incomplete clinical or pathologic records. Data Collection and Variables

Clinical Data:

Demographics, tumor stage ( ypTNM), NCRT regimen, surgical approach, recurrence, and survival outcomes.

Pathologic Data:

Regression Grading: Residual viable tumor percentage, necrosis extent, and lymph node regression (ypN-Reg+/-).

Quantitative Digital Pathology: AI-driven analysis of WSIs to compute NECR-TD, TLS-TD, and T/NR (Figure 1).

Follow-Up:

PFS and OS will be tracked for a minimum of 3 years post-surgery. Statistical Analysis

Survival Analysis:

Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models will assess associations between MPR, histopathologic parameters, and survival outcomes.

Comparative Analysis:

Subgroup analyses will compare outcomes across NCRT regimens and LARC subtypes (e.g., mucinous vs. adenocarcinoma).

Machine Learning:

Prognostic models integrating clinical and histopathologic variables will be developed to predict DFS/OS.

Ethical Considerations The Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) of all participating centers have approved the study protocol.

Patient data will be anonymized, and informed consent will be waived for retrospective cohorts but obtained prospectively.

Innovation and Impact

This study addresses critical gaps in the prognostication of LARC by:

Validating MPR as a standardized endpoint for NCRT efficacy. Introducing quantitative, AI-driven histopathologic biomarkers (e.g., T/NR) to refine risk stratification.

Providing evidence for optimizing NCRT regimens based on tumor biology and regression patterns.

Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and clinical guidelines to improve personalized treatment strategies for LARC.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Rectal Neoplasms Chemotherapy Effect

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adults (≥18 years) diagnosed with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma (clinical stage II-III).

Completion of NCRT followed by curative-intent surgery. Availability of pre- and post-treatment histopathologic data, including standardized regression grading and digitized whole-slide images (WSIs).

Exclusion Criteria

* Metastatic disease at diagnosis. Incomplete clinical or pathologic records.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Yanhong Deng

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Yanhong Deng

M.D.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

GIH-SYSUyip33

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.