Advances in Imaging to Assess Response in Rectal Cancer
NCT ID: NCT06822634
Last Updated: 2025-02-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
20 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-11-11
2026-06-26
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The main question it aims to answer:
Is it feasible to acquire serial MR images for advanced radiotherapy planning for rectal cancer.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Predicting Pathological Complete Response of Rectal Cancer With Magnetic Resonance(MR) Radiomics
NCT03238885
Predicting Neoadjuvant Therapy Response of Rectal Cancer With MRI
NCT02640586
Advanced MR Imaging for Early Biologic Tumor Changes to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Treatment for Rectal Cancer
NCT01830582
Post-Neoadjuvant Treatment MRI Based AI System to Predict pCR for Rectal Cancer
NCT04278274
Application of PET/MRI in the Evaluation of the Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Therapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
NCT06653452
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Radiotherapy (RT) is a well-established treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). It can be used pre operatively in margin threatening disease to increase the likelihood of R0 resection margins; reduce the rate of loco regional recurrence; and to improve loco regional control for patients unsuitable for surgery. There are two treatment regimes used internationally, with strong evidence from numerous randomised clinical trials. These are long course chemoradiotherpy (LCRT) with a dose of 45-60Gy delivered in 25 fractions and short course radiotherapy (SCRT) with a dose of 25Gy in 5 fractions. No long-term superiority of either approach has been found thus far.
RT indications for LARC are defined by clinic-radiological MRI defined criteria. Accurate and precise delineation of the target volume is fundamental to the success of RT. CT planning scans are traditionally used for target delineation in RT, have poor soft tissue contrast and on this dataset have shown overestimation of tumour volumes. Given that magnetic resonance images (MRI) brings superior visualisation of soft tissue in the diagnostic phase of LARC, there has been a move towards routine use of MRI within the delivery of RT.
MRI imaging is considered the gold standard in the staging and response assessment of rectal cancers. The rectum lends well to the exquisite soft tissue definition MRI offers, and additional functional information can be used to further characterise tumour. Improved tumour localisation up front and assessment of responses during RT has the potential to improve patient outcomes in numerous ways.
The use of MRI in RT planning of rectal cancer is relatively new. A survey of UK practice identified specifically 64% of centres use a diagnostic MRI alongside to aid delineation, 28% register MRI images with the diagnostic scan and only 3% use a registered scan in the RT position. National rectal cancer guidelines recommend MRI to be used if possible to aid delineation of the gross tumour volume (GTV). A report published by IPEM gives clear guidance for the optimal use in RT planning for rectal cancer.
There is a general acceptance that the use of MRI in rectal cancer RT planning is superior. In the literature there are a number of studies looking at different aspects of MRI application in the rectal cancer RT pathway. However, there is great disparity in the focus of these research papers.
One of the main challenges in gaining optimal benefit from this technology is the many uncertainties in the planning and delivery of RT to rectal cancers. Largely due to the target being a soft tissue structure, which moves independently due to gas and faecal filling. The surrounding elective volume includes the mesorectum and regional lymph nodes, resulting in targets with a differential motion. This brings more uncertainty in reproducibility, the foundation of accurate and precise RT. MRI with improved soft tissue visualisation could potentially enable voluming of only the tumour and not the full rectal lumen. This could be practice changing and requires careful consideration in implementation. For these reasons correct application of MRI in rectal cancer RT planning is crucial to ensure the optimal benefit from this technology is gained. In the setting of serial imaging reproducibility is more important, where repeatability and reliability of data matters more.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Colorectal cancer patients
Patients with histologically confirmed invasive rectal adenocarcinoma
Observational single centre feasibility study
Patients scheduled to undergo standard of care neo. adjuvant radiotherapy prior to surgery.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Observational single centre feasibility study
Patients scheduled to undergo standard of care neo. adjuvant radiotherapy prior to surgery.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* T stage 3b or above and/or high risk factors eg. EMVI, nodal disease.
* Participant able to give written informed consent.
* Male or non-pregnant female ≥18 years of age.
* Scheduled to undergo radical radiotherapy.
* Patients willing and able to comply with the protocol for the duration of study.
Exclusion Criteria
* Any previous radiotherapy to the pelvis.
* Inflammatory bowel disease.
* Other severe or uncontrolled systemic disease or evidence of any other significant disorder or lab finding that makes it undesirable for the patient to participate in the study, as determined by the treating clinician.
* History of physical or psychiatric disorder that would prevent informed consent and compliance with the protocol.
* Patients with de-functioning stoma.
* Major surgery within 28 days prior to trial entry.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ms Lynsey Devlin
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre
Glasgow, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
329328
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
GN23ON218
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.