Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
NA
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-01-07
2025-01-10
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Stimulation of the Thalamus for Arousal Restoral in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy
NCT04897776
Human Intracranial Electrophysiology
NCT05529264
Feasibility Study: tDCS for Treatment of Refractory Status Epilepticus
NCT05934903
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Measure Cortical Excitability in Dravet Syndrome
NCT04614506
Efficacy of Personnalized Transcranial Direct Current Electrical Stimulation (tDCS) in Drug-resistant Epileptic
NCT06334952
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Approximately 3 million people in the United States experience epilepsy. Despite medical therapy, up to 30% of these patients continue to experience recurrent seizures. In this medically refractory population, tissue resection or ablation offer a high likelihood of seizure freedom, if a single epileptogenic focus can be precisely identified. For patients who are not candidates for resection or ablation, or those who continue to have seizures after these treatments, neuromodulation represents an alternative therapeutic option. One such therapy, deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been approved for around 5 years in Europe and was recently approved in the United States as a treatment for medically refractory epilepsy.
A number of potential DBS targets are being investigated, particularly, the ANT, which consists of the anteroventral, anterodorsal, and anteromedial nuclei. The ANT was recognized as a potential target because of its central connectivity to cortical regions where seizures often originate. Several pilot studies and recent trials have demonstrated 5-year efficacy and safety outcomes for ANT DBS. In a large randomized controlled study of ANT stimulation with long-term follow-up, there was a 56% median seizure reduction at the 2 year, and a 69% median and seizure reduction at the 5 year, in patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy. This study also suggested that patients with temporal lobe epilepsy achieved greater benefit than those with extra-temporal or multifocal seizures. Since these pivotal trials, DBS of the ANT has emerged as a promising therapy for focal drug resistant epilepsy, however, its basic mechanism of action is unclear. One study which examined cortical local field potentials recordings during high-frequency ANT stimulation (130 Hz), has suggested that epileptic network desynchronization is a potential mechanism of DBS of the ANT.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
BASIC_SCIENCE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
ANT recording and stimulation
Up to 15 adult patients who present to Duke Neurosurgery for routine seizure location using sEEG will be asked to enroll in this pilot study of ANT recording and stimulation. Once enrolled in the trial, subjects will have additional placement of two thalamic electrodes during the course of standard sEEG placement surgery. Patients routinely remain hospitalized for 7-14 days after sEEG placement, during which time their seizure medications are tapered. Continuous neural recordings are made through the sEEG electrodes for the purposes of seizure localization during the entire time the depth electrodes are in place. Up to three times daily, standard intermittent high-frequency stimulation \[130 Hertz (Hz), 90-millisecond pulse width, and 2 milliamps (mA) intensity\] will be performed with a 60-seconds on and a 300-seconds off cycle following surgery up to the entire length of sEEG monitoring.
ANT recording and stimulation
In this study, the investigator aims to perform sEEG recordings during simultaneous ANT recording and stimulation to better understand the following: 1) how the ANT is involved in various seizure types; 2) which cortical regions are modulated by established ANT stimulation patterns; and 3) how novel ANT stimulation patterns modify epileptogenic cortical activity.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
ANT recording and stimulation
In this study, the investigator aims to perform sEEG recordings during simultaneous ANT recording and stimulation to better understand the following: 1) how the ANT is involved in various seizure types; 2) which cortical regions are modulated by established ANT stimulation patterns; and 3) how novel ANT stimulation patterns modify epileptogenic cortical activity.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Duke University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Derek Southwell, M.D., Ph.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Duke Health
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Duke University Health System
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Pro00103374
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.