SANTE - Stimulation of the Anterior Nucleus of the Thalamus for Epilepsy
NCT ID: NCT00101933
Last Updated: 2018-03-22
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
157 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2003-12-31
2017-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Stimulation of the Anterior Nucleus of the Thalamus for Epilepsy - Recruitment Stimulation of the Anterior Nucleus of the Thalamus for Epilepsy - Recruitment Rhythm
NCT00772421
Deep Brain Stimulation of the Anterior Nucleus of the Thalamus in Epilepsy
NCT02076698
The Mechanism of cTBS Targeting Dentate Nucleus for DRE
NCT05809349
Subthalamic Nucleus Electrical Stimulation for Drug-resistant Focal Motor Epilepsy
NCT06248333
Thalamic Stimulation for Epilepsy Study
NCT04102254
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The prospective, randomized, double-blind trial uses existing technology to test whether bilateral stimulation of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus can safely and effectively reduce seizure frequency in patients with epilepsy. It includes enrollment of 157 patients at 17 sites in the U.S. 110 patients were implanted and monitored for 13 months following implant, with long-term follow-up until the device is approved or the study is stopped. 109 of the 110 implanted subjects were randomized to Active stimulation or Control.
Patients in the active group, who received neurostimulation, were monitored for a reduction in seizure rates compared to the control group, who did not receive neurostimulation during the three-month double-blind phase. After the double-blind phase, all patients received neurostimulation.
Candidates for the trial were adults with partial-onset epilepsy for whom at least three antiepileptic drugs have proven ineffective. They were to have had an average of six or more seizures per month. Candidates continued to receive their epilepsy medications while participating in the trial.
Deep brain stimulation therapy has already received approval in the United States, Europe, Canada, and Australia for the treatment of Essential Tremor and Parkinson's disease. Deep brain stimulation is not approved in the United States for the treatment of epilepsy.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
Active Stimulation
Medtronic DBS Therapy for epilepsy
Stimulation On
2
No Stimulation
Medtronic DBS Therapy for epilepsy
Stimulation Off
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Medtronic DBS Therapy for epilepsy
Stimulation On
Medtronic DBS Therapy for epilepsy
Stimulation Off
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Anticipated average of 6 or more partial-onset seizures (with or without secondary generalized seizures) per month during the Baseline Phase, with no more than 30 days between seizures during the Baseline Phase.
* Refractory to antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Patients will be considered refractory if they have failed at least three AEDs due to lack of efficacy.
* Receiving one to four currently marketed AEDs
* Be between 18 and 65 years of age at the time of lead implant
Exclusion Criteria
* Symptomatic generalized epilepsy
* Previous diagnosis of psychogenic/non-epileptic seizures
* Presence of implanted electrical stimulation medical device anywhere in the body (e.g., cardiac pacemakers, spinal cord stimulator) or any metallic implants in the head (e.g., aneurysm clip, cochlear implant). Vagal nerve stimulators are allowed if the device has been turned off for at least 30 days prior to the Baseline Week -12 visit and the patient agrees to have the generator explanted prior to or at the time of the Kinetra Neurostimulator implant.
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
MedtronicNeuro
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Miller PM, Gross RE. Wire tethering or 'bowstringing' as a long-term hardware-related complication of deep brain stimulation. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2009;87(6):353-9. doi: 10.1159/000236369. Epub 2009 Sep 10.
Fisher R, Salanova V, Witt T, Worth R, Henry T, Gross R, Oommen K, Osorio I, Nazzaro J, Labar D, Kaplitt M, Sperling M, Sandok E, Neal J, Handforth A, Stern J, DeSalles A, Chung S, Shetter A, Bergen D, Bakay R, Henderson J, French J, Baltuch G, Rosenfeld W, Youkilis A, Marks W, Garcia P, Barbaro N, Fountain N, Bazil C, Goodman R, McKhann G, Babu Krishnamurthy K, Papavassiliou S, Epstein C, Pollard J, Tonder L, Grebin J, Coffey R, Graves N; SANTE Study Group. Electrical stimulation of the anterior nucleus of thalamus for treatment of refractory epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2010 May;51(5):899-908. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2010.02536.x. Epub 2010 Mar 17.
Troster AI, Meador KJ, Irwin CP, Fisher RS; SANTE Study Group. Memory and mood outcomes after anterior thalamic stimulation for refractory partial epilepsy. Seizure. 2017 Feb;45:133-141. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2016.12.014. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
Salanova V, Witt T, Worth R, Henry TR, Gross RE, Nazzaro JM, Labar D, Sperling MR, Sharan A, Sandok E, Handforth A, Stern JM, Chung S, Henderson JM, French J, Baltuch G, Rosenfeld WE, Garcia P, Barbaro NM, Fountain NB, Elias WJ, Goodman RR, Pollard JR, Troster AI, Irwin CP, Lambrecht K, Graves N, Fisher R; SANTE Study Group. Long-term efficacy and safety of thalamic stimulation for drug-resistant partial epilepsy. Neurology. 2015 Mar 10;84(10):1017-25. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001334. Epub 2015 Feb 6.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1604
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.