Virtual Reality as a Distraction Technique for Performing Lumbar Punctures in Children and Young Adu

NCT ID: NCT04092803

Last Updated: 2024-07-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

13 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-09-09

Study Completion Date

2022-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this feasibility study is to determine if Virtual Reality (VR) can be adequately used as an alternative to General Anesthesia (GA) for Lumbar Punctures (LP).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The primary purpose of this study is to determine the feasibility of implementing VR as an alternative to general anesthesia in adolescents and young adults with leukemia who undergo LPs for maintenance of chemotherapy. The patients in this study will be presented the opportunity to use VR instead of undergo GA for a LP. Success will be defined as successful performance of the procedure with VR instead of GA.

Additionally, we plan to administer questionnaires to all patients approached for the trial if they are willing, even if they decide not to use VR for their LP. These questionnaires are listed below.

Studies have linked the use of technology with decreased distress, increased cooperation, and improved pain management. For example, pediatric patients who had access to a video game to engage for distraction during anesthesia induction for surgery were less distressed and more cooperative during mask induction. In children and adolescents requiring port access VR distraction was significantly better than standard of care in terms of reducing physiological arousal (i.e., pulse rate) and pain ratings. VR has been utilized effectively in the management of pediatric and adult wound care, burn care, and dressing changes. Patients who had dressing changes while immersed in VR used less pain medication, had lower pain scores and often requested to use VR for future dressing changes all while having their procedures take less time. Simple distraction techniques might not be enough. One study evaluated the effectiveness of using augmented reality with children undergoing burn dressing changes. They compared augmented reality to standard distraction with an age appropriate video game. The study found augmented reality reduced pain scores significantly better than video game distraction.

When not accompanied by appropriate pain control, stressful and invasive medical procedures can lead to posttraumatic stress symptoms and negative reactions or noncompliance to subsequent medical experiences. Specifically, adults who experienced more medical fear and pain as children were more likely to rate their adult medical fear and pain higher and avoid medical care. Pharmacological strategies alone are often not enough to effectively manage a child's pain. Non-pharmacological pain management uses alternative strategies, such as distraction, to replace or augment medication to help reduce a child's pain. VR systems have been successfully trialed in a small number of patients, mostly adolescents and adults. VR has reliably demonstrated decreased pain, anxiety, suffering, time spent thinking about pain and perceived time spent in a medical procedure.

Typically, VR has to be experienced seated upright or standing with few exceptions because of the design of the software. Patients underoing LP are often required to lay laterally, as is the case with this study. Therefore, we will be using VR software (Pebbles the Penguin and SpacePups, Weightless Studios) that is age appropriate for the study population, engaging enough for young adults, and designed to be reoriented to the patient's position.

The goal of this feasibility study is to determine if VR can be adequately used as an alternative to GA for LP. Utilizing distraction will eliminate the risk associated with general anesthesia, and the accompanying inconvenience of general anesthetic exposure on these patients perioperatively, as well as long term. Additionally, we wish to decrease the burden of cost for these procedures as currently practiced. LPs performed under GA require the presence of an anesthesiologist, medications, and recovery staff, all of which add increased cost to the procedure. With this VR system, there is a one time cost associated with the purchase of the system (in our case, the VR system was donated to our hospital by a non-profit called The Starlight Foundation), and the system can be used multiple times on multiple patients.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Leukemia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

GA for LP

Patients who decline to undergo an LP with VR will be asked if they would be willing to participate by answering questionnaires specific to their pre procedure anxiety. This will include questionnaires 2 and 3 from above. The investigators will also plan to collect vital sign data if they agree to participate in that capacity.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

VR for LP

The patients in this study will be presented the opportunity to use VR instead of undergo GA for a LP. Patients who agree to undergo an LP with VR will be assessed by a certified child life specialist (CCLS) to determine whether the patient is an appropriate candidate for using VR.The system includes a VR headset with VR software already loaded in to it. The VR software to be used is either a game called "Pebbles the Penguin" or "SpacePups" (Weightless Studios).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Virtual Reality

Intervention Type OTHER

The system includes a VR headset with VR software already loaded in to it.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Virtual Reality

The system includes a VR headset with VR software already loaded in to it.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Pediatric and young adult patients 10-25 years of age
2. Lumbar puncture for chemotherapy per leukemia therapy
3. Cognitively appropriate
4. Assessed by child life specialist as appropriate to use VR
5. Previous LP with GA
6. Tested negative for COVID-19

Exclusion Criteria

1. History of seizures
2. Active headache
3. Active nausea or vomiting
4. ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) greater than 4
5. Allergy to lidocaine, procaine, or propofol
6. Developmental delay
7. No previous LP with GA
8. Tested positive for COVID-19, or opted out of of COVID-19 testing
Minimum Eligible Age

10 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

25 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Colorado, Denver

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

James Thomas, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Physician

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Children's Hospital Colorado

Aurora, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

P30CA046934

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

19-0994.cc

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.