Optimal Detection of Atrial Fibrillation in TIA

NCT ID: NCT04075500

Last Updated: 2025-11-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

515 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-03-12

Study Completion Date

2025-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Transient ischemic attack (TIA) is a common neurologic emergency. Although the detection of atrial fibrillation (AF) has identical consequences for preventive therapy in patients with ischemic stroke and TIA, the management setting and diagnostic pathways frequently differ substantially between both manifestations. Despite these differences between stroke and TIA patients, previous studies have investigated diagnostic work-up for AF primarily in stroke patients. Thus, there is no common practice or "gold standard" of rhythm monitoring for TIA patients in most healthcare systems and the optimal method and duration of cardiac monitoring for TIA patients is currently unknown. This is likely to result in a substantial under-diagnosis of AF in TIA patients, failure to initiate appropriate secondary preventive medication (i.e. anticoagulation) and ultimately the occurrence of many otherwise preventable strokes.

The primary research question of the trial is whether prolonged ECG recording using a subcutaneously implanted event recorder increases the detection rate of paroxysmal AF (pAF) within 6 months after the event in patients with recent TIA both compared to 24-h ECG recording and compared to prolonged ECG recording using non-invasive continuous ECG recording for 28 days AND To determine whether 28-day non-invasive ECG monitoring increases the detection rate of pAF within 6 months after the event compared to 24-h ECG recording.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Transient ischemic attacks (TIA) are a common neurologic emergency. Clinical management guidelines recommend oral anticoagulation for TIA patients suffering from atrial fibrillation (AF). Therefore, a diagnosis of AF in TIA patients has a major impact on the choice of adequate secondary stroke prevention. However, detection of paroxysmal AF in patients with TIA can be challenging. AF remains undetected in a relevant proportion of stroke and TIA patients using current routine diagnostic procedures. The actual prevalence of AF in TIA patients is unknown.

Although the detection of AF has identical consequences for preventive therapy in patients with ischemic stroke and TIA, the management setting and diagnostic pathways frequently differ substantially between both manifestations. So far, only limited data exist on AF detection after TIA specifically, and the best method for diagnosis of AF has not been established. The usefulness of prolonged rhythm monitoring using event recorders or non-invasive continuous ECG in TIA patients has not been determined. While the use of an AF detection tool in TIA patients is desirable, an adequate use of resources of AF detection technologies in unselected TIA patients may be needed for this large scale health care problem. Identifying TIA patients that are at increased risk of suffering from AF using clinical and blood-based biomarkers and therefore most likely to benefit from such diagnostic procedures would be useful.

The primary research question of the trial is whether prolonged ECG recording using a subcutaneously implanted event recorder increases the detection rate of paroxysmal AF (pAF) within 6 months after the event in patients with recent TIA both compared to 24-h ECG recording and compared to prolonged ECG recording using non-invasive continuous ECG recording for 28 days AND To determine whether 28-day non-invasive ECG monitoring increases the detection rate of pAF within 6 months after the event compared to 24-h ECG recording. The ODEA-TIA trial is an investigator initiated prospective, multicentre, randomized, open study with blinded outcome assessment comparing different diagnostic methods for detection of paroxysmal AF in patients with recent TIA. The primary endpoint is the rate of AF detection during the 6 months after randomization. Approximately 40 centers in Europe (Germany and Spain) will participate in this trial. Patients with a recent TIA fulfilling the eligibility criteria (see below) will be randomized in a 1:1:1 fashion between 24 h arrhythmia monitoring (control arm) and the two procedures for prolonged ECG monitoring (interventional arms). That means we have two interventional arms, patients receiving either continuous 28d non-invasive ECG monitoring or ECG event recording using a subcutaneously implanted event recorder.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Atrial Fibrillation Transient Ischemic Attack

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Patient will be randomized to either receive 24-h Holter Monitoring or receive one of the two modes for prolonged ECG recording (interventional arms). Patient will either undergo 28-day ECG recording using a commercially available Holter Recorder that can function as a non-invasive ECG patch or receive an implantable cardiac device (REVEAL LINQ).
Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm 1

Control arm, 24-h Holter monitoring

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Arm 2

1st interventional arm, subcutaneously implanted event recorder (REVEAL LINQ)

Group Type OTHER

Subcutaneously implanted event recorder (REVEAL LINQ)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Patients receive a subcutaneously implantable cardiac device (REVEAL LINQ).

Arm 3

2nd interventional arm, 28-day continuous ECG monitoring

Group Type OTHER

28-day non-invasive continuous ECG monitoring (patch)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Patients receive a non-invasive continuous ECG monitoring (patch)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Subcutaneously implanted event recorder (REVEAL LINQ)

Patients receive a subcutaneously implantable cardiac device (REVEAL LINQ).

Intervention Type DEVICE

28-day non-invasive continuous ECG monitoring (patch)

Patients receive a non-invasive continuous ECG monitoring (patch)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Written informed consent by patient.
* Age ≥ 50 years.
* TIA diagnosed by a stroke physician defined as rapidly developing clinical signs of focal or global disturbances of cerebral function, lasting less than 24 hours with no apparent non-vascular cause
* 12-channel ECG available before enrolment
* Brain imaging available before enrolment (CCT or cranial MRI)
* Vascular imaging of cervical vessels performed

Exclusion Criteria

* Previously documented history of AF
* Ischemic stroke within the last 6 months before enrolment
* Pre-screening monitoring for cardiac arrhythmias lasting ≥72 hours
* AF lasting \> 30 s on a 12 channel ECG or other ECG recording technique prior to enrolment
* Life expectancy less than 1 year.
* Significant stenosis \> 50% in intracranial or extracranial vessels which, in the opinion of the investigator, is the likely cause of the patients TIA.
* Severely disabled patients (i.e. modified Rankin Score \>3)
* Lack of therapeutic consequence in case of diagnosis of AF (e.g. other indication for long term anticoagulation
* Pacemaker or Implanted Cardiac Defibrillator
Minimum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medtronic Bakken Research

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Coordinating Centre for Clinical Trials Heidelberg

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Wuerzburg University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Alfried Krupp Krankenhaus

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Roland Veltkamp, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Initiator of study, leader PI

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Neurologie

Aachen, , Germany

Site Status

Rhön Klinikum Campus Bad Neustadt

Bad Neustadt an der Saale, , Germany

Site Status

Vivantes Klinikum Neukölln

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Carl-Thiem-Klinikum Cottbus; Klinik für Neurologie

Cottbus, , Germany

Site Status

Klinikum Dortmund, Klinikzentrum Mitte / Neurologie

Dortmund, , Germany

Site Status

Alfried Krupp Krankenhaus

Essen, , Germany

Site Status

Universitätsmedizin Frankfurt; Klinik für Neurologie;

Frankfurt, , Germany

Site Status

Bezirkskliniken Schwaben; Bezirkskrankenhaus Günzburg; Klinik für Neurologie

Günzburg, , Germany

Site Status

Krankenhaus Marth-Maria-Halle-Dölau GmbH; Klinik für Neurologie

Halle, , Germany

Site Status

Universitätsmedizin Halle; Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale); Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie

Halle, , Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinik Heidelberg, Neurologie

Heidelberg, , Germany

Site Status

Universität Leipzig, Medizinische Fakultät; Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie

Leipzig, , Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck

Lübeck, , Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Tübingen; Neurologische Universitätsklinik; Abt. Neurologie mit Schwerpunkt vaskuläre Erkrankungen

Tübingen, , Germany

Site Status

RKU Universitäts- und Rehabilitationskliniken Ulm

Ulm, , Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Würzburg

Würzburg, , Germany

Site Status

Hospital Universitario de Cruces

Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain

Site Status

Complejo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña

A Coruña, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario Torrecárdenas

Almería, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol

Badalona, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital del Mar

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario Reina Sofia

Córdoba, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Dr. Josep Trueta

Girona, , Spain

Site Status

Complejo Hospitalario Clinico Universitario de Santiago

Santiago de Compostela, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio

Seville, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Virgen Macarena

Seville, , Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany Spain

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

AKKNeuro2019July

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Connected Cardiology to Control Cardiac Rythm
NCT06091514 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA