30-Day Cardiac Event Monitor Belt for Recording Atrial Fibrillation After a Cerebral Ischemic Event

NCT ID: NCT00846924

Last Updated: 2018-10-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

564 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-05-31

Study Completion Date

2018-10-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Atrial fibrillation is the most common cardiac cause of ischemic stroke. Detecting atrial fibrillation after a stroke or TIA is critical because highly effective secondary stroke prevention therapy is available for individuals who are recognized to have atrial fibrillation. However, atrial fibrillation is likely under-diagnosed after stroke and TIA because atrial fibrillation is often difficult to detect as it is frequently paroxysmal and asymptomatic, and patients do not routinely undergo prolonged screening. The purpose of this study is to determine the diagnostic yield of a novel 30-day cardiac event monitor compared to a repeat 24-hour Holter monitor for detecting occult paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in patients with a recent ischemic stroke or TIA of undetermined etiology after completion of a standard clinical stroke work-up (including an initial negative Holter monitor.)

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stroke Transient Ischemic Attack Atrial Fibrillation Atrial Flutter

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

repeat 24-hour Holter monitor

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

24-hour Holter

Intervention Type DEVICE

Repeat standard 24-hour Holter Monitor

30-day ambulatory cardiac event monitor

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

a 30-day ambulatory cardiac event monitor

Intervention Type DEVICE

Patients will be fitted with dry electrode belt (including cardiac event monitor)and instructed to wear the device for as many hours(waking and sleeping) each day as possible, for a total of 30 days.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

a 30-day ambulatory cardiac event monitor

Patients will be fitted with dry electrode belt (including cardiac event monitor)and instructed to wear the device for as many hours(waking and sleeping) each day as possible, for a total of 30 days.

Intervention Type DEVICE

24-hour Holter

Repeat standard 24-hour Holter Monitor

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

AccuHeart Electrode Belt, Braemar ER 910AF (cardiac event monitor) Performed as per individual hospital routines

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Diagnosis of the index event\* made by a stroke specialist of an acute ischemic stroke or TIA (WHO definition) of undetermined etiology (cryptogenic) occurring within the previous 6 months (180 days).The event must be either:

* an embolic arterial ischemic stroke confirmed by neuroimaging; or
* a transient ischemic attack, defined as involving a focal unilateral motor deficit, speech/language deficit, or hemianopia, with symptom duration \<24 hours (note: amaurosis fugax/transient monocular blindness, pure sensory spells, isolated vertigo spells, etc. do not qualify for enrolment given the potential for misdiagnosis of such events).
2. Patient meets the following:

* At least one 12-lead ECG has already been obtained as part of the routine clinical post-stroke/TIA work-up, and no ECGs have shown any episodes of atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter, and;
* A Holter monitor has already been obtained as part of the routine clinical post-stroke/TIA work-up, and does not show any episodes of atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter ≥30 seconds.
3. The patient is being actively investigated for the etiology of the stroke/TIA event and additional cardiac monitoring is desired to screen further for the possibility of occult paroxysmal atrial fibrillation/flutter, i.e. patients selected for this study are those for whom the investigator, in his/her clinical judgment, would consider ordering a repeat Holter monitor as part of clinical care.
4. The following diagnostic tests have already been completed as part of clinical routine post-stroke/TIA:

* brain imaging with CT or MRI,
* vascular imaging of the extracranial and intracranial circulation with either CT angiography or MR angiography to exclude significant large vessel occlusive disease as the most likely mechanism for the index ischemic event (carotid Doppler ultrasound is acceptable for those presenting with anterior circulation ischemic events),
* transthoracic (or transesophageal) echocardiography to exclude thrombus or other structural heart disease that in the opinion of the investigator is the most likely cause for the stroke/TIA event. \[Note: If a baseline echocardiogram cannot be obtained clinically after the index event and prior to study enrollment, then it is acceptable for study purposes for an echocardiogram to be obtained after patient enrollment into the study but prior to the 90-day follow-up visit. Alternatively, an echocardiogram already performed within one year prior to study enrollment may serve as the baseline echocardiogram for study purposes.\]
5. Age 55 years or older \[Note: Participants aged 55-59 years should have imaging confirmation of the index stroke/TIA event with an embolic imaging pattern of acute cerebral ischemia\]
6. Informed consent from the patient (or from a legally authorized representative if the patient is not competent, e.g. due to stroke-related cognitive impairment, aphasia, or anosognosia).
7. The patient is expected to survive at least 6 months.
8. The patient has a valid provincial health insurance number.

* The index event will be defined as the event leading to medical presentation

Exclusion:

1. Any previously documented atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter, i.e. a past history of atrial fibrillation/flutter or atrial fibrillation/flutter detected on ECG, Holter, or telemetry following the index stroke/TIA event (a remote history of transient perioperative atrial fibrillation is not exclusionary
2. Exclusively retinal stroke or TIA event.
3. A most responsible etiological diagnosis for the qualifying stroke/TIA event has already been determined, i.e. probable small-vessel (lacunar) disease, probable large vessel disease, cervicocephalic artery dissection, venous sinus thrombosis, hypercoagulable states, or other known cause.
4. Planned carotid endarterectomy within 90 days.
5. Patient is already currently participating in a clinical trial involving an investigational medication or device.\*
6. Any finding on echocardiography for which there is already an evidence-based indication for long-term anticoagulation (e.g. mechanical heart valve, thrombus, etc.).
7. Endocarditis
8. Pacemaker or ICD device.
9. Patients with known skin reactions to synthetic polymers or to silver. (Some people who display sensitivity to silver jewellery are sensitive to the impurities present in silver alloys and not to the silver itself. These people may participate.)
Minimum Eligible Age

55 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr. David Gladstone

Study Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

David J Gladstone, MD, PhD, FRCPC

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Foothills Medical Centre

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Grey Nuns Hospital

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Walter C. Mackenzie Health Sciences Centre

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Vancouver Hospital and Health Sciences Centre

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Vancouver Island Health Research Centre (VIHA)

Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Hamilton Health Sciences Centre

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Kingston General Hospital

Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

London Health Sciences Centre

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Robarts Research Institute

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute -The Ottawa Hospital

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Thunder Bay Regional HSC

Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

St. Michael's Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

UHN / Toronto Western Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

York Central Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Montreal General Hospital

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

CHA-Hôpital de l'Enfant-Jesus

Québec, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Gladstone DJ, Dorian P, Spring M, Panzov V, Mamdani M, Healey JS, Thorpe KE; EMBRACE Steering Committee and Investigators. Atrial premature beats predict atrial fibrillation in cryptogenic stroke: results from the EMBRACE trial. Stroke. 2015 Apr;46(4):936-41. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.008714. Epub 2015 Feb 19.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25700289 (View on PubMed)

Gladstone DJ, Spring M, Dorian P, Panzov V, Thorpe KE, Hall J, Vaid H, O'Donnell M, Laupacis A, Cote R, Sharma M, Blakely JA, Shuaib A, Hachinski V, Coutts SB, Sahlas DJ, Teal P, Yip S, Spence JD, Buck B, Verreault S, Casaubon LK, Penn A, Selchen D, Jin A, Howse D, Mehdiratta M, Boyle K, Aviv R, Kapral MK, Mamdani M; EMBRACE Investigators and Coordinators. Atrial fibrillation in patients with cryptogenic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2014 Jun 26;370(26):2467-77. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1311376.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24963566 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Embrace001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.