Follow-up of Kryptogenic Stroke Patients With Implantable vs. Non-invasive Devices to Detect Atrial Fibrillation.
NCT ID: NCT02641678
Last Updated: 2016-01-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
106 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2013-03-31
2015-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
1. How many stroke patients with atrial fibrillation are missed by standard stroke unit 24h- electrocardiography, and
2. what is the effectiveness of the extended invasive and non-invasive ECG analysis tools to detect atrial fibrillation in stroke patients?
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Detecting Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With an Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source (From the DAF-ESUS Registry)
NCT04761315
Extended Rhythm SCreening for AtRial Fibrillation in Cryptogenic Stroke Patients
NCT01550042
Early Detection of Atrial Fibrillation Using Mobile Technology in Cryptogenic Stroke Patients
NCT05006105
Intensive Rhythm Monitoring to Decrease Ischemic Stroke and Systemic Embolism - the Find-AF 2 Study
NCT04371055
Detection of Occult Paroxysmal AF in Cryptogenic Stroke or TIA Patients Using an Implantable Loop Recorder and Correlation With Genetic Markers.
NCT02216370
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Due to the known poor sensitivity of a 24h-ECG, all patients with stroke of unknown cause will undergo the above mentioned non-invasive and invasive ECG monitoring. Based on the data of these extended ECG-analyses, the rate of missed AF in conventionally diagnosed stroke unit patients could be determined by comparison to the 24h-ECG results. Additionally, a cost-benefit equation of the different ECG analysis tools will be calculated by comparison of the respective detection rates and the known follow-up costs.
Inclusion criteria: Patients years with acute ischemic stroke of unknown cause, monitored on a stroke unit undergoing routine diagnostic procedures (conventional 12-lead-ECG, 24h-ECG, echocardiography, cranial computed tomography or cranial magnetic resonance tomography, Transcranial Doppler and carotid duplex ultrasound, long-term blood pressure monitoring, standard laboratory investigations) Exclusion criteria: Stroke with known etiology, Stroke caused by intracranial hemorrhage
Diagnosis-as-usual:
\- Standard 24h-ECG on stroke units according to existing guidelines
Investigational measure:
Non-invasive:
* Online ECG analysis during the standardized stroke unit- monitoring
* Ambulatory 7-day ECG monitoring
Invasive:
\- atrial fibrillation detection by a permanently implantable direct cardiac rhythm monitor device in a period of up to 6 month
Duration of measures per patient:
2 weeks hospitalization, \~1 month rehabilitation, then implantation of the ECG device, and 6 months follow-up: 7.5 months in total
Primary outcome:
To determine the prevalence of undiagnosed AF in stroke patients undergoing the diagnostic standard (24h-ECG)
Secondary outcome:
Effectivity and cost-effectiveness ratios of the different ECG analyis tools
Description of the outcome:
Based on the obtained data, the prevalence of undiagnosed atrial fibrillation in stroke patients whom atrial fibrillation is missed by the standard diagnostic procedure (24h-ECG) will be determined by different extensive non-invasive and invasive ECG monitoring tools.
Additionally, following values of the applied ECG analysis tools will be calculated and compared:
* Sensitivity: (true positives) / (true positives + false negatives)
* Specificity: (true negatives) / (true negatives + false positives)
* Positive predicted value: (true positives) / (true positives + false positives)
* Negative predicted value: (true negatives) / (true negatives + false negatives)
Safety:
The implantable direct cardiac rhythm monitor device is an established and widely used diagnostic procedure in patients with unexplained syncope.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Implantation of cardiac monitor
In patients with kryptogenic stroke, a cardiac monitor was implanted to detect atrial fibrillation
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
European Union
OTHER
University Hospital Muenster
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Dittrich Ralf, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Department of Neurology, University of Muenster
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Bettin M, Dechering D, Kochhauser S, Bode N, Eckardt L, Frommeyer G, Reinke F. Extended ECG monitoring with an implantable loop recorder in patients with cryptogenic stroke: time schedule, reasons for explantation and incidental findings (results from the TRACK-AF trial). Clin Res Cardiol. 2019 Mar;108(3):309-314. doi: 10.1007/s00392-018-1358-4. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
Reinke F, Bettin M, Ross LS, Kochhauser S, Kleffner I, Ritter M, Minnerup J, Dechering D, Eckardt L, Dittrich R. Refinement of detecting atrial fibrillation in stroke patients: results from the TRACK-AF Study. Eur J Neurol. 2018 Apr;25(4):631-636. doi: 10.1111/ene.13538. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
TRACK-AF
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.