Atrial Fibrillation Detected by ELR and Holter Recording, a Comparison in Patients With Ischemic Stroke or TIA
NCT ID: NCT02155907
Last Updated: 2018-05-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
1507 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2013-06-01
2017-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
1. To validate 2 -day loop recording ( R.Test Evolution 4 ) to 2 -day Holter recording (gold standard) for the detection of atrial fibrillation of ≥ 30 seconds duration in a consecutive population of patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA).
2. To determine whether short run of atrial fibrillation (\< 30s ) or the presence of many supraventricular extrasystoles detected on Holter recording, is associated with risk of re-stroke in a consecutive population of patients with stroke or TIA .
3. To test whether a 7-day Loop Recording (R -test) detects more patients with atrial fibrillation than 2 days of Holter recording in a consecutive population of patients with stroke or TIA.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
30-Day Cardiac Event Monitor Belt for Recording Atrial Fibrillation After a Cerebral Ischemic Event
NCT00846924
Early Detection Of Atrial Fibrillation In Patients With Transient Ischemic Attack
NCT02011256
Optimal Detection of Atrial Fibrillation in TIA
NCT04075500
Evaluation of 5 Days Holter and 30 Days Thumb-ECG for Detection of Atrial Fibrillation in Stroke Patients
NCT02261766
Finding Atrial Fibrillation in Stroke - Evaluation of Enhanced and Prolonged Holter Monitoring
NCT01855035
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Detection of atrial fibrillation in patients with recent stroke or TIA: Validity of automated loop-recording (Rtest) compared to Holter recording and predictive value of short runs of atrial fibrillation and an excess supraventricular extra systoles for a new stroke
Abstract:
Stroke constitutes a major health problem both nationally and globally. Each year 15 million people worldwide are attacked by stroke. In Denmark stroke hits 14.000 people a year and is the third leading cause of death. In this research project, we will examine the heart rate of more than 1,500 patients whom within 1 week has had a blood clot in the brain (ischemic stroke) or have had symptoms of a blood clot in the brain, which has dwindled within 24 hours (TIA). There are no clear international or national guidelines regarding the optimal way to detect atrial fibrillation in stroke and TIA patients, though atrial fibrillation is known to increase fivefold the risk of stroke. Holter recording with two days electrocardiogram is considered as the golden standard for investigation of heart rhythm disturbances and is offered at Department of Neurology in Holstebro, where we recruit patients. Holter recording is a resource-intensive procedure in data analysis. Project patients will be mounted with a 2- day Holter and Rtest for either 2 or 7 days. The Rtest is a loop recorder and a new device on the market that continuously monitor and opposite a Holter recorder, automatically analyses heart rhythm. The validity of the Rtest with regard to detect atrial fibrillation compared to Holter is unknown and is what we which to clarify. Additionally we use the 2-day Holter recordings to test whether short-term rhythm disorders as atrial fibrillation \<30 seconds, and/or many extra heartbeats (supraventricular extra systoles) increases the risk of stroke recurrence. Patients will be followed in the Danish Stroke Register. If an increased risk is found, these gray area patients who are currently not offered anticoagulant therapy, may prove to have treatment indication. If the study shows that loop recording can replace Holter recording it will mean an economic gain. The study is expected to contribute substantial evidence for the future treatment of stroke and TIA patients.Stroke constitutes a major health problem both nationally and globally. Each year 15 million people worldwide are attacked by stroke. In Denmark stroke hits 14.000 people a year and is the third leading cause of death. In this research project, we will examine the heart rate of more than 1,500 patients whom within 1 week has had a blood clot in the brain (ischemic stroke) or have had symptoms of a blood clot in the brain, which has dwindled within 24 hours (TIA). There are no clear international or national guidelines regarding the optimal way to detect atrial fibrillation in stroke and TIA patients, though atrial fibrillation is known to increase fivefold the risk of stroke. Holter recording with two days electrocardiogram is considered as the golden standard for investigation of heart rhythm disturbances and is offered at Department of Neurology in Holstebro, where we recruit patients. Holter recording is a resource-intensive procedure in data analysis. Project patients will be mounted with a 2- day Holter and Rtest for either 2 or 7 days. The Rtest is a loop recorder and a new device on the market that continuously monitor and opposite a Holter recorder, automatically analyses heart rhythm. The validity of the Rtest with regard to detect atrial fibrillation compared to Holter is unknown and is what we which to clarify. Additionally we use the 2-day Holter recordings to test whether short-term rhythm disorders as atrial fibrillation \<30 seconds, and/or many extra heartbeats (supraventricular extra systoles) increases the risk of stroke recurrence. Patients will be followed in the Danish Stroke Register. If an increased risk is found, these gray area patients who are currently not offered anticoagulant therapy, may prove to have treatment indication. If the study shows that loop recording can replace Holter recording it will mean an economic gain. The study is expected to contribute substantial evidence for the future treatment of stroke and TIA patients.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Rtest, Atrial fibrillation
Patients with ischemic stroke or TIA within the last week. Sinus rhythm on the surface ECG. Age ≥ 60 years. Given written informed consent
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hospitalsenheden Vest
OTHER
University of Aarhus
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Michala H Sejr, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Aarhus
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Regional Hospital of Herning, Cardiovascular Research Unit, Medical Department
Herning, Jutland, Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Sejr MH, May O, Damgaard D, Sandal BF, Nielsen JC. External continuous ECG versus loop recording for atrial fibrillation detection in patients who had a stroke. Heart. 2019 Jun;105(11):848-854. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-314186. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Rtest
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.