Respiratory Muscle Training Before Surgery in Preventing Lung Complications in Patients With Stage I-IIIB Lung Cancer

NCT ID: NCT04067830

Last Updated: 2025-09-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

220 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-03-20

Study Completion Date

2027-03-22

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This phase II trial studies how well respiratory muscle training before surgery works in preventing lung complications after surgery in patients with stage I-IIIB lung cancer. Patients with lung cancer who choose to undergo surgical resection often have complications after surgery such as pneumonia, unplanned intubations, difficulty breathing and reduced physical functioning, and increased medical costs and a reduced quality of life. Improving pre-surgical pulmonary health through respiratory muscle training may improve respiratory muscle strength, response to surgery, and quality of life after surgery in patients with lung cancer.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. Assess the impact of a short-duration respiratory muscle training (RMT) program on respiratory muscle strength in patients undergoing resection for lung cancer.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. Compare the extent of diaphragm atrophy and catabolic/anabolic pathway activation between RMT responders and non-responders evaluated for gene expression and candidate and candidate causative protein levels.

II. Determine the effect of the short-duration RMT program on health related quality-of-life measures.

III. Assess the impact of the short-duration RMT program on postoperative outcomes.

EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:

I. Determine the financial sustainability of a transitional home-based prehabilitation program targeting respiratory muscle weakness prior to lung resection.

II. Analysis of molecular markers to correlate with patient outcome and potentially differentiate responders from non-responders.

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.

ARM I (USUAL CARE): Patients receive usual care consisting of physical therapy once weekly, receiving pre-surgical information, instruction on the use of a spirometer device, and wearing a Fitbit to track activity. Patients then undergo video-assisted thoracic surgery or laparoscopic surgery. Patients continue to track activity using the Fitbit for 3 months post-surgery.

ARM II (RMT + USUAL CARE): Patients use a power lung device to complete 3 sets of 15 RMT exercises over 30 minutes 6 days per week over 2-4 weeks for a minimum of 12 sessions prior to surgery. Patients also receive usual care consisting of physical therapy once weekly, receiving pre-surgical information, instruction on the use of a spirometer device, and wearing a Fitbit to track activity. Patients then undergo video-assisted thoracic surgery or laparoscopic surgery. Patients continue to track activity using the Fitbit for 3 months post-surgery.

After completion of study, patients are followed up at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stage I Lung Cancer AJCC v8 Stage IA1 Lung Cancer AJCC v8 Stage IA2 Lung Cancer AJCC v8 Stage IA3 Lung Cancer AJCC v8 Stage IB Lung Cancer AJCC v8 Stage II Lung Cancer AJCC v8 Stage IIA Lung Cancer AJCC v8 Stage IIB Lung Cancer AJCC v8 Stage IIIA Lung Cancer AJCC v8 Stage IIIB Lung Cancer AJCC v8

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm I (usual care)

Patients receive usual care consisting of physical therapy once weekly, receiving pre-surgical information, instruction on the use of a spirometer device, and wearing a Fitbit to track activity. Patients then undergo video-assisted thoracic surgery or laparoscopic surgery. Patients continue to track activity using the Fitbit for 3 months post-surgery.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Best Practice

Intervention Type OTHER

Receive usual care

Laparoscopic Surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Undergo laparoscopic surgery

Quality-of-Life Assessment

Intervention Type OTHER

Ancillary studies

Questionnaire Administration

Intervention Type OTHER

Ancillary studies

Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Undergo video-assisted thoracic surgery

Arm II (RMT + usual care)

Patients use a power lung device to complete 3 sets of 15 RMT exercises over 30 minutes 6 days per week over 2-4 weeks for a minimum of 12 sessions prior to surgery. Patients also receive usual care consisting of attending physical therapy once weekly, receiving pre-surgical information, instruction on the use of a spirometer device, and wearing a Fitbit to track activity. Patients then undergo video-assisted thoracic surgery or laparoscopic surgery. Patients continue to track activity using the Fitbit for 3 months post-surgery.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Best Practice

Intervention Type OTHER

Receive usual care

Laparoscopic Surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Undergo laparoscopic surgery

Quality-of-Life Assessment

Intervention Type OTHER

Ancillary studies

Questionnaire Administration

Intervention Type OTHER

Ancillary studies

Respiratory Muscle Training Device

Intervention Type DEVICE

Use power lung device to complete RMT

Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Undergo video-assisted thoracic surgery

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Best Practice

Receive usual care

Intervention Type OTHER

Laparoscopic Surgery

Undergo laparoscopic surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Quality-of-Life Assessment

Ancillary studies

Intervention Type OTHER

Questionnaire Administration

Ancillary studies

Intervention Type OTHER

Respiratory Muscle Training Device

Use power lung device to complete RMT

Intervention Type DEVICE

Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery

Undergo video-assisted thoracic surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

standard of care standard therapy laparoscopic-assisted resection laparoscopy-assisted surgery Quality of Life Assessment VATS

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Documented stage I-IIIb lung cancer or is undergoing surgery for diagnosis
* Participant is able to speak, read, and comprehend English
* Participant must be undergoing or is anticipated to either video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS or robotic surgery) or laparoscopic surgery for curative intent lung resection
* Patients with or without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) prior to surgery will be included
* Ability to follow written and verbal instructions
* Participant must understand the investigational nature of this study and sign an Independent Ethics Committee/Institutional Review Board approved written informed consent form prior to receiving any study related procedure

Exclusion Criteria

* Documented ischemic heart disease; congestive heart failure or; significant cardiac arrhythmias that would exclude them from having surgery
* Overall medical frailty (clinician discretion) or ECOG \> 2
* Pregnant or nursing female participants
* Unwilling or unable to follow protocol requirements
* Any condition which in the investigator's opinion deems the participant an unsuitable candidate to participate in this study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Roswell Park Cancer Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Saikrishna S Yendamuri

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Roswell Park Cancer Institute

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Roswell Park Cancer Institute

Buffalo, New York, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Saikrishna S. Yendamuri

Role: primary

716-845-8675

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NCI-2019-03537

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

I 72818

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

R01CA222382

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

I 72818

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.