Randomized Study to Compare CyberKnife to Surgical Resection In Stage I Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

NCT ID: NCT00840749

Last Updated: 2020-07-14

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

36 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-12-31

Study Completion Date

2013-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Lung cancer remains the most frequent cause of cancer death in both men and women in the world. Surgical resection using lobectomy with mediastinal lymph node dissection or sampling has been a standard of care for operable early stage NSCLC. Several studies have reported high local control and survival using SBRT in stage I NSCLC patients. SBRT is now an accepted treatment for medically inoperable patients with stage I NSCLC and patients with operable stage I lung cancer are entered on clinical protocols. The purpose of this study is to conduct a phase III randomized study to compare CyberKnife SBRT with surgery, the current standard of care for stage I operable NSCLC.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Objectives:

Primary Goal: To compare overall survival at 3 years.

Secondary goals:

1. To compare disease specific survival at 3 years.
2. To compare 3 year progression free survival at the treated primary tumor site
3. To compare grade 3 and above acute and/or chronic toxicities.
4. To evaluate predictive value of pre and post treatment PET scan in clinical outcome.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

CyberKnife Stereotactic Radiotherapy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CyberKnife Stereotactic Radiotherapy

Intervention Type RADIATION

Central lesion dose/fractionation: 15 Gy x 4 fractions = 60 Gy; Peripheral lesion dose/fractionation: 20 Gy x 3 fractions = 60 Gy

Surgery

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Both open thoracotomy and video assisted thoracotomy (VATS) are acceptable procedures. Surgery may consist of a lobectomy, sleeve resection, bilobectomy or pneumonectomy as determined by the attending surgeon based on the operative findings

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

CyberKnife Stereotactic Radiotherapy

Central lesion dose/fractionation: 15 Gy x 4 fractions = 60 Gy; Peripheral lesion dose/fractionation: 20 Gy x 3 fractions = 60 Gy

Intervention Type RADIATION

Surgery

Both open thoracotomy and video assisted thoracotomy (VATS) are acceptable procedures. Surgery may consist of a lobectomy, sleeve resection, bilobectomy or pneumonectomy as determined by the attending surgeon based on the operative findings

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

CyberKnife SBRT, CyberKnife SRT, CyberKnife SRS Open thoracotomy, video assisted thoracotomy (VATS)

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Histological confirmation of non-small cell cancer will be required by either biopsy or cytology. The following primary cancer types are eligible: squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma with or without BAC features, large cell carcinoma with or without neuroendocrine features, neuroendocrine carcinoma, bronchioloalveolar cell carcinoma, or non-small cell carcinoma not otherwise specified.
2. Eligible patients must have appropriate staging studies identifying them as specific subsets of the revised IASCL state IA or IB based on only one of the following combinations of TNM staging:

T1, N0, M0 or T2 (\<=4 cm), N0, M0
3. A PET/CT scan is required. Patients with hilar or mediastinal lymph nodes with short axis diameter \< 1 cm and no abnormal hilar or mediastinal uptake on PET will be considered N0. Patients with \> 1 cm short axis diameter of hilar or mediastinal lymph nodes on CT or abnormal PET (including suspicious but non-diagnostic uptake) may still be eligible if directed tissue biopsy of all abnormally identified areas are negative for cancer. Solitary pulmonary lesions \<4 mm will not be considered significant.
4. The patients must be considered a reasonable candidate for surgical resection of the primary tumor. Standard justification for deeming a patient medically operable based on pulmonary function for surgical resection of NSCLC may include any of the following: Baseline FEV1 \> 40% predicted, post-operative predicted FEV1 \> 30% predicted, diffusion capacity \> 40% predicted, absent baseline hypoxemia and/or hypercapnia, exercise oxygen consumption \> 50% predicted, absent severe pulmonary hypertension, absent severe cerebral, cardiac, or peripheral vascular disease, and absent severe chronic heart disease.
5. Patients must be ≥ 18 years of age.
6. The patient's Zubrod performance status must be Zubrod 0-2.
7. Mandatory staging studies: Must be done within 8 weeks prior to study entry
8. Patients must sign a study-specific consent form.
9. Patients (men and women) of child bearing potential should use an effective (for them) method of birth control throughout their participation in this study.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patients with primary tumors \> 4 cm;
2. Patients with well-differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma (carcinoid tumor)
3. Direct evidence of regional or distant metastases after appropriate staging studies, or synchronous primary or prior malignancy in the past 5 years other than nonmelanomatous skin cancer or in situ cancer;
4. Previous lung or mediastinal radiotherapy;
5. Plans for the patient to receive other concomitant local therapy (including standard fractionated radiotherapy and surgery) while on this protocol except at disease progression;
6. Pregnant or lactating women, as treatment involves unforeseeable risks to the embryo or fetus;
7. Cannot achieve acceptable SRT planning to meet minimal requirement of target coverage and dose-volume constraints of critical structures (see RT techniques).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Accuray Incorporated

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jack Roth, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Community Regional Medical Center

Fresno, California, United States

Site Status

Penrose Cancer Center

Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Denver CyberKnife

Lone Tree, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Jupiter Medical Center

Jupiter, Florida, United States

Site Status

Advocate Christ Medical Center

Oak Lawn, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Parkview Cancer Center

Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Central Baptist Hospital

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

St. Joseph Mercy Hospital

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

St. Mary's of Michigan

Saginaw, Michigan, United States

Site Status

St. Mary's Duluth Clinic Health System

Duluth, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Saint Louis University

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

St. Mary's

Reno, Nevada, United States

Site Status

St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

U.T. M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Ruikang Hospital

Nanning, Guangxi, China

Site Status

Tianjin Cancer Institute and Hospital

Hexi Linchang, Tianjin Municipality, China

Site Status

Centre Oscar Lambret

Lille, , France

Site Status

Centre Antoine Lacassagne

Nice, , France

Site Status

CyberKnife Center of WanFang Medical Hospital

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States China France Taiwan

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Park S, Kim HJ, Park IK, Kim YT, Kang CH. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy versus surgery in older patients with stage I lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Jul 14;60(1):74-80. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezab045.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33668061 (View on PubMed)

Chang JY, Senan S, Paul MA, Mehran RJ, Louie AV, Balter P, Groen HJ, McRae SE, Widder J, Feng L, van den Borne BE, Munsell MF, Hurkmans C, Berry DA, van Werkhoven E, Kresl JJ, Dingemans AM, Dawood O, Haasbeek CJ, Carpenter LS, De Jaeger K, Komaki R, Slotman BJ, Smit EF, Roth JA. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy versus lobectomy for operable stage I non-small-cell lung cancer: a pooled analysis of two randomised trials. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Jun;16(6):630-7. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)70168-3. Epub 2015 May 13.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25981812 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

STARS

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.