Microwave Ablation of Primary and Secondary Lung Malignancies
NCT ID: NCT04369872
Last Updated: 2020-11-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE1/PHASE2
35 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-05-01
2022-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is currently an alternative therapy for these patients with 3-year survival rates of between 42 and 60%. SBRT has excellent local control rates and a favorable toxicity profile relative to other surgical and non-surgical therapies. Radiation pneumonitis (RP), amongst others, is one of the major toxicities which can limit the maximal radiation dose that can be safely delivered to thoracic tumors. Reported rates of SBRT induced RP requiring clinical intervention range from 0% to 29% and life-threatening toxicities have been reported in up to 12% of cases in various studies. The potential for toxicities from SBRT could limit the number of times a patient could be treated with SBRT for residual, recurrent or new pulmonary lesions over time.
Following the first report of thermal ablation for lung malignancies in 2000, this modality has been used to treat primary and secondary malignancies and has emerged as an effective, low-cost, safe and repeatable alternative to SBRT for local tumour control. The most widely practised technique is radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Microwave ablation (MWA) is a relatively new therapy and offers all the advantages of RFA, but with significant additional advantages 3. These include reduced procedure times, lower complication rates, increased ablative temperatures, improved propagation of thermal energy particularly in the lung, improved efficacy in lesions that are in close proximity to blood vessels due to reduced heat-sink effect, and less procedure associated pain 2,3. Using high energy MWA to treat 87 pulmonary tumors, Egashira et al achieved a primary technical success rate of 94% and technique effectiveness of 98% at a median of 15 months.
MWA is performed by Interventional Radiologists using CT guidance. The treatment is performed under general anaesthesia and is repeatable. Multiple lesions can be ablated in one treatment session. Patients can potentially be discharged the same day of treatment, if there are no adverse events.
MWA is a relatively new treatment option that could be considered in situations where the patient is not a candidate for further treatment with surgery, SBRT or chemotherapy, or the patient declines the recommended standard available treatments.
Objectives for Phase I:
The primary objective for Phase I of this study will be to demonstrate the Safety of MWA performed for treatment of lung malignancy in patients not suitable for surgery, chemotherapy or SBRT.
Primary objective (Safety): to determine the proportion of patients experiencing local adverse events at one week definitively related to the mwa procedure.
Secondary objective (Feasibility): To determine the proportion of patients in whom technical success of MWA was achieved by assessing completion of ablation on CT at the time of the procedure, indicated by replacement of tumor by ground glass change (including a 5mm ablation zone in normal surrounding lung parenchyma).
Objectives for Phase II Primary objective (Efficacy): To demonstrate efficacy by measuring the proportion of patients demonstrating absence of residual tumor on follow up CT at 1 month after MWA.
Secondary objective: To determine the proportion of patients needing re-treatment for recurrent tumor at 1 month post MWA.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Microwave Ablation
Study participants will receive percutaneous microwave ablation of their malignant lung neoplasm.
Microwave ablation
Microwave ablation of lung lesion using Solero Microwave Tissue Ablation system.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Microwave ablation
Microwave ablation of lung lesion using Solero Microwave Tissue Ablation system.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient median estimate survival of \> 1 year, as determined by the treating physician
* ECOG 0-1
* \<5 lesions in either lung
* Limited and/or controlled extra-pulmonary disease - to be determined by multidisciplinary consensus
* Not amenable to surgery, SBRT or chemotherapy (or patient refusal)
* Patient will have documentation by surgeon and/or radiation oncologist that the patient is unamenable to surgery and SBRT
Exclusion Criteria
* Lesions within 1 cm of any critical mediastinal structure (e.g. aorta, main pulmonary arteries, esophagus, phrenic nerve), diaphragm or pleura
* FEV1≤35% predicted
* Clinically significant emphysema (to be determined by the treating physician)
* Previous pneumonectomy
* Inability to tolerate pneumothorax as judged by referring clinician's clinical assessment
* Inability to tolerate general anaesthetic
* Inability to provide informed consent
* INR \> 1.5
* Platelets \< 100
* PTT \> 40
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Calgary
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Stefan J Przybojewski, MB ChB
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Calgary
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Foothills Medical Centre
Calgary, Alberya, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Stefan J Przybojewski
Role: primary
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HREBA.CC-19-0304
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id