Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Supraclavicular Block Associated With a Pecs Blocks I to Ensure Analgesia When Placing a Pacemaker
NCT ID: NCT04067024
Last Updated: 2019-08-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
31 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-01-18
2017-07-07
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Pilot Study on Pacemaker Interference From Peripheral Nerve Stimulator for Regional Anesthesia
NCT00586248
Effective Use of Pecs and Transversus Thoracics Plane Blocks for Subcutaneous Cardiac Pacemaker Insertion: A Case Series
NCT03899701
Physiological Pacing for AV Block to Prevent Pacemaker-induced Cardiomyopathy
NCT05214365
Can Medical Personnel Properly Proceed in the Case of a Patient With Bradycardia?
NCT02711748
Influence of Thoracic Paravertebral Block on Atrioventricular Conduction
NCT06833086
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Second, a supraclavicular nerve block was performed. We initially identified the C5 root and scanned cranially to visualize the superficial cervical plexus. then, moving caudally, the supraclavicular nerve was isolated appearing as a hypoechogenic structure between scalenus medius and posterior border of the sternocleidomastoid muscle. A total of 3 ml of ropivacaine 0,375% was deposited nearby this nerve.
In the ALC group (Anesthesia Local Surgeon's Anesthesia: Local Infiltration of N = 15 tissues) 15 ml Ropivacaine 3.75 mg/ml were injected in the subclavicular area, as usual, starting from the skin to the depth of the muscles.
In case of patient discomfort or failure of the techniques used, a further local infiltration consisting of a maximum of 10 ml lidocaine 2% performed as required by the surgeon was allowed as rescue. If this failed, the depth of sedation would gradually increase and ventilation would be controlled either by face or laryngeal mask Propofol 1-3 mg / Kg / IV + sufentanyl 2.5 μg / IV).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Local anesthesia by the surgeon (LAS)
Local infiltration (ropivacaine 3,75 mg/ml) by surgeon
Local anesthesia made by surgeon
infiltration with local anesthetics
Regional anesthesia group (LRA):
By ultrasound, a pecs block I associated with a supraclavicular nerf block is performed. (Ropivacaine 3,75 mg/ml)
Regional anesthesia group
Pecs block I and Supraclavicular nerf block
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Local anesthesia made by surgeon
infiltration with local anesthetics
Regional anesthesia group
Pecs block I and Supraclavicular nerf block
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients scheduled for the implantation of a pace-maker
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients included in another protocol within 3 months
* Pregnant or breastfeeding patients
* Allergy to local anesthetics
* Patients with a contraindication to regional anesthesia (coagulopathy, local infection, etc.)
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Erasme University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
wendy Fernandez, Dr.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Erasme Hospital,Route de lenniek 808, 1070, Brussels
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Erasme Hospital
Brussels, , Belgium
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
P2016/447
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.