Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Supraclavicular Block Associated With a Pecs Blocks I to Ensure Analgesia When Placing a Pacemaker

NCT ID: NCT04067024

Last Updated: 2019-08-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

31 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-01-18

Study Completion Date

2017-07-07

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Pacemakers are currently placed at the Erasmus Hospital under local anesthesia performed by the surgeon, and the amount of local anesthetic agents sometimes reach the maximum permitted doses, with a risk of systemic toxicity. Moreover, these patients often present an associated conduction block. This represents a contraindication/constraint in the use of lidocaine 2% (local anesthesia frequently used by the surgeon to infiltrate). This study hypothesized that using a block of the supraclavicular nerve associated with a Pecs Block I. guided by ultrasound should require a smaller quantity of local anesthetic.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

PECS 1 Block and Supraclavicular Nerve Block, were performed by an anesthesiologist under ultrasound control using a linear 8Mzt transducer, a Phillips HD 11 machine and a 50 mm needle Stimuplex 360 Braun. The ALR procedure was performed 30 minutes before the surgical incision. A volume of 15 ml of ropivacaine 3.75 mg/ml is used and distributed as follows: 12 ml for the Pecs 1 Block and 3 ml for the Supraclavicular nerve block: The patient was placed in supine position with the arm abducted at about 90 °, the puncture site being sterilized with betadine. The transducer was first placed in a subclavicular position in order to identify the major and minor pectoralis muscles, as well as the thoracoacromial artery, particularly the pectoral branch, additional color Doppler, was used for the identification of those vessels. The needle was directed in plane to the intermuscular space lying between the large and small pectoral, a careful avoidance of the thoracoacromial artery or its pectoral branch was ensured. The LA injection, under visual control of the spread between the two muscles, was initiated at the level of the 2nd and 3rd ribs after a classical aspiration test; 12 ml of the ropivacaine 0.375% were used. A spread of the LA appearing as an intermuscular hypoechoic "lens" was always searched.

Second, a supraclavicular nerve block was performed. We initially identified the C5 root and scanned cranially to visualize the superficial cervical plexus. then, moving caudally, the supraclavicular nerve was isolated appearing as a hypoechogenic structure between scalenus medius and posterior border of the sternocleidomastoid muscle. A total of 3 ml of ropivacaine 0,375% was deposited nearby this nerve.

In the ALC group (Anesthesia Local Surgeon's Anesthesia: Local Infiltration of N = 15 tissues) 15 ml Ropivacaine 3.75 mg/ml were injected in the subclavicular area, as usual, starting from the skin to the depth of the muscles.

In case of patient discomfort or failure of the techniques used, a further local infiltration consisting of a maximum of 10 ml lidocaine 2% performed as required by the surgeon was allowed as rescue. If this failed, the depth of sedation would gradually increase and ventilation would be controlled either by face or laryngeal mask Propofol 1-3 mg / Kg / IV + sufentanyl 2.5 μg / IV).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain Pacemaker Ddd

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Local anesthesia by the surgeon (LAS)

Local infiltration (ropivacaine 3,75 mg/ml) by surgeon

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Local anesthesia made by surgeon

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

infiltration with local anesthetics

Regional anesthesia group (LRA):

By ultrasound, a pecs block I associated with a supraclavicular nerf block is performed. (Ropivacaine 3,75 mg/ml)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Regional anesthesia group

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Pecs block I and Supraclavicular nerf block

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Local anesthesia made by surgeon

infiltration with local anesthetics

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Regional anesthesia group

Pecs block I and Supraclavicular nerf block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Women and men \> 18 years of age
* Patients scheduled for the implantation of a pace-maker

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients refusing to sign the consent
* Patients included in another protocol within 3 months
* Pregnant or breastfeeding patients
* Allergy to local anesthetics
* Patients with a contraindication to regional anesthesia (coagulopathy, local infection, etc.)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Erasme University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

wendy Fernandez, Dr.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Erasme Hospital,Route de lenniek 808, 1070, Brussels

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Erasme Hospital

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

P2016/447

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.