A Pilot Study on Pacemaker Interference From Peripheral Nerve Stimulator for Regional Anesthesia
NCT ID: NCT00586248
Last Updated: 2008-01-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
14 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2006-03-31
2007-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Supraclavicular Block Associated With a Pecs Blocks I to Ensure Analgesia When Placing a Pacemaker
NCT04067024
Effective Use of Pecs and Transversus Thoracics Plane Blocks for Subcutaneous Cardiac Pacemaker Insertion: A Case Series
NCT03899701
Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Cardioneuroablation to Permanent Pacing in Patients With an Implanted Pacemaker for Symptomatic Bradycardia.
NCT05896592
Application of the "Haemoblock" in Pacemaker Patients
NCT04559646
Ventricular Electrical Synchronization by Stimulating Left and Right Bundle Branches Area in Pacing-indicated Patients
NCT04023890
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mayo Clinic
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mayo Clinic Jacksonville
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ruei Hsin D Wang, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Mayo Clinic
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Mayo Clinic Jacksonville
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Skinner HB. Multimodal acute pain management. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2004 May;33(5 Suppl):5-9.
De Andres J, Alonso-Inigo JM, Sala-Blanch X, Reina MA. Nerve stimulation in regional anesthesia: theory and practice. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2005 Jun;19(2):153-74. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2004.11.002.
Rasmussen MJ, Hayes DL, Vlietstra RE, Thorsteinsson G. Can transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation be safely used in patients with permanent cardiac pacemakers? Mayo Clin Proc. 1988 May;63(5):443-5. doi: 10.1016/s0025-6196(12)65639-0.
O'Flaherty D, Wardill M, Adams AP. Inadvertent suppression of a fixed rate ventricular pacemaker using a peripheral nerve stimulator. Anaesthesia. 1993 Aug;48(8):687-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1993.tb07181.x.
Kaiser H, Niesel HC, Hans V. [Fundamentals and requirements of peripheral electric nerve stimulation. A contribution to the improvement of safety standards in regional anesthesia]. Reg Anaesth. 1990 Sep;13(7):143-7. German.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
06-002237
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.