A Pilot Study on Pacemaker Interference From Peripheral Nerve Stimulator for Regional Anesthesia

NCT ID: NCT00586248

Last Updated: 2008-01-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

14 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-03-31

Study Completion Date

2007-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In this prospective pilot study, we proposed to evaluate the effects of left interscalene stimulation on cardiac pacemaker function.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The principle of the nerve stimulation technique consists of using a battery powered peripheral nerve stimulator to generate electrical stimuli through an insulated needle at appropriate anatomical locations. The electrical impulses then trigger depolarization as insulated needle approaches the target nerve bundles. Braun Stimuplex, a common nerve stimulator used for peripheral nerve localization, is currently being used in the United States and other countries. Previous studies have suggested it to be a reliable stimulator for the purpose of peripheral nerve blocks. The operational manual however indicated that this device should not be used in patients with cardiac pacemaker because malfunction of the pacemaker may occur. Literature search on the topic of pacemaker interference from peripheral nerve stimulator showed that there was one case of pacemaker interference caused by activation of a nerve stimulator, resulting in cardiac arrest in a patient with a fixed-rate ventricular pacemaker. Studies and case reports suggest that unipolar electrode seems to be most susceptible to interferences from electrosurgical equipment, TENS unit, spinal cord stimulators. Perhaps this is the reason why the manufacturer of the peripheral nerve stimulator recommends against the use of peripheral nerve stimulator in patients with pacemakers. With the advancements of modern pacemakers technology, it is our experience; interscalene nerve blocks and other peripheral nerve blocks using the nerve stimulator can be performed in patients with pacemakers without notable interferences with pacemaker functions and perhaps the initial recommendation by the peripheral nerve stimulator manufacturer can be modified. In this prospective pilot study, we proposed to evaluate the effects of left interscalene stimulation (most likely scenario to interfere with pacemaker function) by varying the configurations of the pacemaker leads (unipolar vs. bipolar pacer lead configuration) and by varying the positions of the positive electrode of the stimulator.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pacemaker, Artificial

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* age greater than 18, ASA II or III status

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnancy, unable to provide informed consent
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mayo Clinic

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mayo Clinic Jacksonville

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ruei Hsin D Wang, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Mayo Clinic

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mayo Clinic Jacksonville

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Skinner HB. Multimodal acute pain management. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2004 May;33(5 Suppl):5-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15195936 (View on PubMed)

De Andres J, Alonso-Inigo JM, Sala-Blanch X, Reina MA. Nerve stimulation in regional anesthesia: theory and practice. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2005 Jun;19(2):153-74. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2004.11.002.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15966491 (View on PubMed)

Rasmussen MJ, Hayes DL, Vlietstra RE, Thorsteinsson G. Can transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation be safely used in patients with permanent cardiac pacemakers? Mayo Clin Proc. 1988 May;63(5):443-5. doi: 10.1016/s0025-6196(12)65639-0.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 3258950 (View on PubMed)

O'Flaherty D, Wardill M, Adams AP. Inadvertent suppression of a fixed rate ventricular pacemaker using a peripheral nerve stimulator. Anaesthesia. 1993 Aug;48(8):687-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1993.tb07181.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8214459 (View on PubMed)

Kaiser H, Niesel HC, Hans V. [Fundamentals and requirements of peripheral electric nerve stimulation. A contribution to the improvement of safety standards in regional anesthesia]. Reg Anaesth. 1990 Sep;13(7):143-7. German.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 2236709 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

06-002237

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Ideal Pacer Pad Position Study
NCT03898050 COMPLETED NA