Ideal Pacer Pad Position Study

NCT ID: NCT03898050

Last Updated: 2022-10-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-09-30

Study Completion Date

2022-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Temporary transcutaneous cardiac pacing is a life-saving procedure in patients with unstable bradycardia. The American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines for the management of unstable bradycardia recommend initiating transcutaneous pacing in patients unresponsive to atropine while addressing the primary cause of the bradycardia. The two most commonly described pacer pad application sites are the anterior-posterior (A-P) position (positive pad placed under the left scapula and negative pad placed on the left anterior lower chest wall) and the anterior-lateral (A-L) position (positive pad placed on the right anterior chest wall and negative pad placed on the left lower axilla). Major resuscitation organization (AHA, European, Australian) guidelines and text books of emergency medicine recommendations for pacer pad placement do not address the issue of which set of positions are preferred. There are no published human studies addressing ideal pacer pad placement. This study's objective is to assess if there is a significant difference in the pacing threshold (mA) between these two pacer pad positions. The study hypothesis is that the anterior-posterior position will require a lower current and cause less involuntary muscle contraction. The investigators plan to enroll volunteer human subjects undergoing elective cardioversion in the electrophysiology laboratory for atrial fibrillation/flutter. After successful cardioversion to a sinus rhythm, each subject will be transcutaneously paced to mechanical capture in both pacer pad positions. Optimal placement will be determined by the pad position with the lowest current required for capture. The conclusions of this study will provide evidence for the optimal choice regarding pacer pad placement, which can be used in future resuscitation guidelines.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Temporary transcutaneous cardiac pacing is a life-saving procedure in patients with unstable bradycardia. The American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines for the management of unstable bradycardia recommend initiating transcutaneous pacing in patients unresponsive to atropine while addressing the primary cause of the bradycardia. The two most commonly described pacer pad application sites are the anterior-posterior (A-P) position (positive pad placed under the left scapula and negative pad placed on the left anterior lower chest wall) and the anterior-lateral (A-L) position (positive pad placed on the right anterior chest wall and negative pad placed on the left lower axilla). Major resuscitation organization (AHA, European, Australian) guidelines and text books of emergency medicine recommendations for pacer pad placement do not address the issue of which set of positions are preferred. There are no published human studies addressing ideal pacer pad placement. This study's objective is to assess if there is a significant difference in the pacing threshold (mA) between these two pacer pad positions. The study hypothesis is that the anterior-posterior position will require a lower current and cause less involuntary muscle contraction. The investigators plan to enroll volunteer human subjects undergoing elective cardioversion in the electrophysiology laboratory for atrial fibrillation/flutter. After successful cardioversion to a sinus rhythm, each subject will be transcutaneously paced to mechanical capture in both pacer pad positions. Optimal placement will be determined by the pad position with the lowest current required for capture. The conclusions of this study will provide evidence for the optimal choice regarding pacer pad placement, which can be used in future resuscitation guidelines.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Symptomatic Bradycardia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

The study will employ a prospective crossover design in which participants will function as their own controls. It will compare the pacing threshold of the two most common pacer pad placement positions. Pad placement order will be randomized to eliminate carry-over effect.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

A-P

Anterior - Posterior pad placement

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

transcutaneous cardiac pacing

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

transcutaneous cardiac pacing

A-L

Anterior - Lateral pad placement

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

transcutaneous cardiac pacing

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

transcutaneous cardiac pacing

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

transcutaneous cardiac pacing

transcutaneous cardiac pacing

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age \>17 years.
* Scheduled for cardioversion of supraventricular dysrhythmia in the electrophysiology lab.
* Full decision-making capacity.
* Fluent in English language.

Exclusion Criteria

* Age \<18 years.
* Unable to provide informed consent for any reason (including altered mental status or hemodynamic instability).
* Prisoner, under custody or ward of state.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Maryland, Baltimore

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Siamak Moayedi, MD

Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Maryland Medical Center

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Moayedi S, Patel P, Brady N, Witting M, Dickfeld TL. Anteroposterior pacer pad position is better than anterolateral for transcutaneous cardiac pacing. Resuscitation. 2022 Dec;181:140-146. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2022.11.009. Epub 2022 Nov 18.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36410605 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HP-00085450

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Ablation at Virtual-hEart pRedicted Targets for VT
NCT03536052 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Pacing in First-degree AV-block
NCT01985802 COMPLETED NA