Guideline-based Pacing Therapy for Reflex Syncope

NCT ID: NCT01509534

Last Updated: 2015-07-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

281 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-01-31

Study Completion Date

2015-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Study hypothesis: Dual-chamber pacemaker therapy with rate-hysteresis features is effective in preventing syncopal recurrences in patients affected by cardioinhibitory (CI) forms of reflex syncope diagnosed by means of carotid sinus massage, tilt table testing or implantable loop recorder (ILR). The outcome is measured either by the time to first syncopal recurrence or the total syncope burden.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background Divergence of opinion exists regarding the efficacy of cardiac pacing in patients affected by different forms of reflex syncope.

Definitions.

Severe syncope is defined when:

* it is perceived by patient that it alters his/her quality of life, and
* is unpredictable because occurs without, or with very short prodromes \< 10 sec (thus exposing patients to risk of trauma) or, if preceded by prodromes, syncope recurs despite appropriate therapies (CPM or drugs).

Recurrent syncopes: at least 2 episodes during the last year (including the index episode) or 3 episodes during the last 2 years (including the index episode).

Suspected (undetermined) reflex syncope: the suspicion of reflex syncope is based on a history of uncertain syncope in the absence of (i) severe structural heart disease, significant ECG abnormalities, or rhythm disturbances; (ii) orthostatic hypotension; and (iii) non-syncopal causes of transient loss of consciousness.

Study protocol

1. The eligible patients undergo firstly carotid sinus massage (according to the method of symptoms); if a diagnosis of cardioinhibitory carotid sinus syndrome (CI-CSS) is made, a pacemaker is implanted and follow-up immediately starts.
2. If the carotid sinus massage is negative or vasodepressor, the patients undergo tilt table testing (with nitroglycerin or clomipramine drug challenge); if a diagnosis of VASIS 2B form is made, a pacemaker is implanted and follow-up immediately starts.
3. If tilt table testing is negative or a form different from VASIS 2B is induced, the patients undergo ILR implantation. If a diagnosis of asystolic reflex syncope is made, a pacemaker is implanted and follow-up immediately starts.

End-points End-point of the study is syncope recurrence after pacemaker (PM) implantation. Syncope is defined as complete transient loss of consciousness. Pre-syncope is counted but it is not an end-point.

Primary end-points:

1. Comparison of the time to first syncopal recurrence in CI-CSS and CI-TTT pts with PM and in control patients with ILR.
2. Intra-patient comparison of the syncope burden in the year before and in the year following PM implant in all patients receiving a PM (CCS, TTT and ILR groups). Index syncope is not counted.

Follow-up One year after PM implantation for all enrolled patients for burden of syncope end-points Until the study end for time to first syncope recurrence end-points. Thus, the study ends one year after the enrollment of the last patient.

Study size Based on the sample size calculation the study will stop when 700 patients are enrolled.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Syncope

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients affected by severe, recurrent, certain or suspected (undetermined) reflex syncopes, aged ≥ 40 years.

Exclusion Criteria

* Reflex syncopes due to reversible causes, e.g., vasoactive drugs, concomitant diseases, etc
* Suspected of certain cardiac syncope
* Syncope caused by orthostatic hypotension
* Non-syncopal causes of transient loss of consciousness
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Gruppo Italiano Multidisciplinare per lo Studio della Sincope

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Michele Brignole, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Ospedali del Tigullio, Lavagna, Italy

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ospedale Generale Regionale

Bolzano, , Italy

Site Status

AO di Rilievo Nazionale e di Alta Specializzazione Garibaldi

Catania, , Italy

Site Status

PO S. Giuseppe

Empoli, , Italy

Site Status

AO Careggi

Florence, , Italy

Site Status

Nuovo Ospedale S. Giovanni di Dio

Florence, , Italy

Site Status

Department of Cardiology, Ospedali del Tigullio

Lavagna, , Italy

Site Status

Arcispedale S. Maria Nuova

Reggio Emilia, , Italy

Site Status

Ospedale SS. Annunziata

Taranto, , Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Solari D, Tesi F, Unterhuber M, Gaggioli G, Ungar A, Tomaino M, Brignole M. Stop vasodepressor drugs in reflex syncope: a randomised controlled trial. Heart. 2017 Mar;103(6):449-455. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2016-309865. Epub 2016 Sep 23.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27664002 (View on PubMed)

Brignole M, Arabia F, Ammirati F, Tomaino M, Quartieri F, Rafanelli M, Del Rosso A, Rita Vecchi M, Russo V, Gaggioli G; Syncope Unit Project 2 (SUP 2) investigators. Standardized algorithm for cardiac pacing in older patients affected by severe unpredictable reflex syncope: 3-year insights from the Syncope Unit Project 2 (SUP 2) study. Europace. 2016 Sep;18(9):1427-33. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv343. Epub 2015 Nov 26.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26612880 (View on PubMed)

Brignole M, Ammirati F, Arabia F, Quartieri F, Tomaino M, Ungar A, Lunati M, Russo V, Del Rosso A, Gaggioli G; Syncope Unit Project (SUP) Two Investigators. Assessment of a standardized algorithm for cardiac pacing in older patients affected by severe unpredictable reflex syncopes. Eur Heart J. 2015 Jun 21;36(24):1529-35. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv069. Epub 2015 Mar 29.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25825044 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

GIMSI-001-2011

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Ideal Pacer Pad Position Study
NCT03898050 COMPLETED NA