Effect of Closed Loop Pacemaker Treatment on Recurrent Vasovagal Syncope
NCT ID: NCT00292825
Last Updated: 2010-04-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2006-02-28
2010-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Risk of Syncopal Relapses in Patients Treated With Permanent Pacing for Bradyarrhythmic Syncope
NCT04229589
Prevention of Syncope by Cardiac Pacing in Patients With Bifascicular Block
NCT01463358
Guideline-based Pacing Therapy for Reflex Syncope
NCT01509534
Bradycardia Risk Stratification With Loop Recorder After Syncope
NCT04200014
Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Cardioneuroablation to Permanent Pacing in Patients With an Implanted Pacemaker for Symptomatic Bradycardia.
NCT05896592
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Vasodilatation is an obligate element of all vasovagal syncopal episodes and in many also an early sign associated with the hyperkinetic empty left ventricle which triggers the reflex wave. The principle in closed loop stimulation (CLS) is a continuous surveillance of the impedance in the right ventricle which correlates highly with myocardial contractility. When contractility is increased significantly atrial pacing with prolonged AV delay is commenced. This principle has been used in chronotropic incompetent patients and in one small study of patients with vasovagal syncope with a positive outcome. The hypothesis is that the CLS will potentially identify an incipient vasovagal attack and be able to prevent the drop in cardiac output and bradycardia by early accelerated pacing.
Patients will be treated 12 months with active pacing (CLS) and then crossed over to 12 months with passive pacing (VVI, 30 bpm).
The study will be double blinded, only a technician will know the status of the pacemaker.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Pacemaker treatment, pacemaker programmed as active = CLS
Pacemaker treatment with closed loop function(CLS)
Pacemaker, programmed as passive = VVI 30 beats per minute (bpm)
pacemaker treatment as VVI 30 bpm
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* A positive tilt-table test.
* Exclusion of other causes for syncope by a complete diagnostic work-up allowing only minor cardiac abnormalities
* Syncope for \>= 2 years.
* Number of syncopal episodes \>= 3
* At least 1 instance of syncope within the last 6 months.
* A positive tilt-table test which reproduces the clinical syncope and is associated with a clearly abnormal haemodynamic response:
* Vasovagal Syncope International Study (VASIS) type 1 with bradycardia \< 40 bpm, or
* VASIS type 2A, or
* VASIS type 2B
* Stable clinical condition
* Able to accept and follow the protocol and give written consent.
Exclusion Criteria
* Indication for cardiac resynchronisation therapy (i.e. left bundle branch block \[LBBB\])
* Documented atrial fibrillation or flutter
* Epilepsy
* Congestive heart failure
* History of myocardial infarction (MI) or angina pectoris
* Serious chronic disease, life expectancy \< 3 years.
* Age \< 25 years
* Pregnant and lactating women
* Participating in other investigation
25 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Aarhus University Hospital
OTHER
Biotronik SE & Co. KG
INDUSTRY
Aarhus University Hospital Skejby
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby; Århus, Denmark
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Henning Mølgaard, MD, DMSc
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Department of Cardiology, Skejby Sygehus, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Henning Mølgaard, MD, DMSc
Århus N, Århus N, Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
skejbyH
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.