Medtronic Shock-Less Study on Physician Utilization of Shock Reduction Programming
NCT ID: NCT00856349
Last Updated: 2014-07-03
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
4384 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2009-04-30
2013-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effect of Low LEVel TrAgus STimulation on the Electrophysiological Substrate of Patients With Ischemic CardioMyopathy Substrate of Subjects With Ischemic CardioMyopathy
NCT03549468
Smartphone Twelve Lead Electrocardiogram Utility In ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction
NCT04057404
Characterization of Cardiac Electrophysiological Effects of Autonomic Neuromodulation
NCT05377216
Endocardial Pacing in On-table Non-responders in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
NCT01193712
To Determine Optimal Time for Delivering Electrical Shocks to Cardiac Arrest Patients
NCT01665755
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Analysis cohort
Enrolled subjects who met study eligibility criteria and contributed data toward study endpoints.
Therapy Programming Report (TPR)
Center-specific therapy programming reports (TPRs) illustrating physician usage of shock reduction programming are provided to each center approximately 9-12 months after their first enrollment and monthly thereafter throughout the study.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Therapy Programming Report (TPR)
Center-specific therapy programming reports (TPRs) illustrating physician usage of shock reduction programming are provided to each center approximately 9-12 months after their first enrollment and monthly thereafter throughout the study.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Subject has been implanted with a Medtronic market released ICD or CRT-D device (US/Canada - Concerto®/Virtuoso® or newer model; AsiaPacific, Israel, Latin America - EnTrust™, InSync Sentry®, or Concerto®/Virtuoso® or newer model) within the past 30 days
* Subject has commercially released RA (if applicable), RV, and LV (if applicable) leads
Exclusion Criteria
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Marc Silver, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Raleigh Cardiology Associates
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Anniston, Alabama, United States
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Tucson, Arizona, United States
Hot Springs, Arkansas, United States
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
Fremont, California, United States
Fresno, California, United States
Modesto, California, United States
Northridge, California, United States
Orange, California, United States
San Bernardino/Los Angeles, California, United States
Ventura, California, United States
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Ocala, Florida, United States
Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, United States
Pensacola, Florida, United States
Plantation, Florida, United States
Rockledge, Florida, United States
St. Petersburg, Florida, United States
Zephyrhills, Florida, United States
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Berwyn, Illinois, United States
Elk Grove Village, Illinois, United States
Maywood, Illinois, United States
Evansville, Indiana, United States
Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States
Scarborough, Maine, United States
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Takoma Park, Maryland, United States
New Bedford, Massachusetts, United States
Flint, Michigan, United States
Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States
Lansing, Michigan, United States
Saint Joseph, Michigan, United States
Robbinsdale, Minnesota, United States
Saint Louis Park, Minnesota, United States
Jackson, Mississippi, United States
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Lincoln, Nebraska, United States
Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
Cherry Hill, New Jersey, United States
Clifton, New Jersey, United States
Flemington, New Jersey, United States
Newark, New Jersey, United States
Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States
Elmira, New York, United States
Flushing, New York, United States
New York, New York, United States
Utica, New York, United States
Williamsville, New York, United States
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
Wilmington, North Carolina, United States
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
Fargo, North Dakota, United States
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Mansfield, Ohio, United States
Youngstown, Ohio, United States
Lawton, Oklahoma, United States
Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States
Medford, Oregon, United States
Erie, Pennsylvania, United States
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Wyomissing, Pennsylvania, United States
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
Columbia, South Carolina, United States
Sioux Falls, South Dakota, United States
Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
El Paso, Texas, United States
Fort Sam Houston, Texas, United States
Houston, Texas, United States
McAllen, Texas, United States
Tyler, Texas, United States
Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
Manassas, Virginia, United States
Charleston, West Virginia, United States
Morgantown, West Virginia, United States
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
Buenos Aires, , Argentina
Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
Frankston, Victoria, Australia
Perth, Western Australia, Australia
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Kitchener, Ontario, Canada
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Beijing, , China
Kowloon, , Hong Kong
New Dehli, National Capital Territory of Delhi, India
Sāket, New Dehli, India
Mexico City, , Mexico
Frankton, Hamilton, New Zealand
Singapore, , Singapore
Seoul, , South Korea
Kaohsiung City, , Taiwan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Joung B, Lexcen DR, Ching CK, Silver MT, Piccini JP, Sterns LD, Rabinovich R, Pickett RA, Liu S, Brown ML, Cheng A. Additional antitachycardia pacing programming strategies further reduce unnecessary implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks. Heart Rhythm. 2020 Jan;17(1):98-105. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.07.027. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Shock-Less
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.