Pacemaker Therapy for Drug-refractory Symptoms in Mid-cavity Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
NCT ID: NCT03450252
Last Updated: 2023-02-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
17 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-02-09
2023-01-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Comparison of Two Treatments: Pacemaker and Percutaneous Transluminal Septal Ablation for Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
NCT00001894
CArdiac Desynchronization In Obstructive HCM, CARDIO-HCM
NCT01332162
Biventricular Pacing in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy After Aortic Valve Replacement
NCT01081093
Biventricular Pacing in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
NCT00504647
Studying the Effectiveness of Pacemaker Therapy in Children Who Have Thickened Heart Muscle
NCT00001960
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The obstruction can cause patients to suffer from symptoms such as shortness of breath and chest pain, along with poor exercise tolerance, and dizzy spells. In very symptomatic patients with the commonest type of obstruction, invasive procedures performed either via an open-heart or keyhole operation can reduce the increased basal septal muscle mass at the point of obstruction. However, in around 1 in 10 HCM patients, the obstruction is deep within the LV where a ring of thick muscle blocks blood flow when it contracts. These patients provide a challenge for doctors, as this type of obstruction is much less suitable for open heart or keyhole operation.
An alternative is to use a cardiac pacemaker to alter the timing of the contraction in the ring of thick muscle such that different parts of the ring contract at different times and thereby reduce obstruction to blood flow. The investigators' early experience with this new treatment shows that carefully placing the pacemaker wires can reduce the obstruction and improve patient symptoms.
Key questions of this research include:
* How much can optimal ventricular pacing reduce the obstruction by?
* How important is choosing which part of the heart the pacemaker activates first?
* Does reducing obstruction in this way make patients better in the short and long term?
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
At the pre-implant visit, participants will undergo assessment of symptoms, physical performance and blood test for a protein, Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP).
During the pacemaker implantation, the investigators will record the pressures within the heart using a catheter during both active pacing and back-up pacing settings.
The day after the pacemaker implant participants will undergo double-blind randomisation into either the treatment or non-treatment arm (active or back-up pacing respectively). At four months, cross-over takes place with assessment as above, before device reprogramming into either the treatment or non-treatment arm depending on which was completed first.
At the end of the second four month period, participants will undergo repeat assessment as above. That will conclude the study.
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Active pacing
Active ventricular pacing. The pacemaker is set-up with a short atrio-ventricular delay to allow for appropriate pacing capture of the ventricle.
Active pacing
Ventricular pacing via the invasive haemodynamic study-defined optimal pacing site in order to relieve pressure gradient across the mid-cavity obstruction in mid-cavity obstructive variant hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
Back-up pacing
Back-up pacing. The pacemaker is set-up to sense and pace only in the right atrium (AAI) without any pacing capacity in the ventricle.
Back-up pacing
Back-up pacing. The pacemaker is set-up to sense and pace only in the right atrium (AAI) without any pacing capacity in the ventricle.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Active pacing
Ventricular pacing via the invasive haemodynamic study-defined optimal pacing site in order to relieve pressure gradient across the mid-cavity obstruction in mid-cavity obstructive variant hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
Back-up pacing
Back-up pacing. The pacemaker is set-up to sense and pace only in the right atrium (AAI) without any pacing capacity in the ventricle.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Referred for PPM +/- ICD implantation for either primary prevention of sudden cardiac death or other indications such as heart block or obstructive physiology.
3. HCM patients with evidence of mid-cavity gradient demonstrated by echocardiography and gradient ≥30 mmHg confirmed by cardiac catheterisation at rest or with isoprenaline provocation.
4. All patients should be taking maximum tolerated doses of beta blockers or verapamil with or without disopyramide.
5. Symptoms refractory to optimum medical therapy as above, for example breathlessness, chest pain, dizziness, or syncope.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patients with moderate or severe valvular stenosis or regurgitation.
3. Patients with a history of myocardial infarction or acute coronary syndrome.
4. Patients unable to provide informed consent.
5. Patients in atrial fibrillation.
6. Pregnancy.
7. Renal failure.
8. If considered unsuitable by clinician.
9. Patients already participating in trials involving invasive procedures.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Barts & The London NHS Trust
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Saidi A Mohiddin, BSc, MBChB, FRCP, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Barts Health NHS Trust and Queen Mary University of London
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Barts Heart Centre
London, Thames, United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Malcolmson JW, Hughes RK, Husselbury T, Khan K, Learoyd AE, Lees M, Wicks EC, Smith J, Simms AD, Moon JC, Lopes LR, O'Mahony C, Sekhri N, Elliott PM, Petersen SE, Dhinoja MB, Mohiddin SA. Distal Ventricular Pacing for Drug-Refractory Mid-Cavity Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Personalized Pacing. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2024 Jul;17(7):e012570. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.123.012570. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
V11_27 10 20
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.