Seated Balance Using the Indego™

NCT ID: NCT04047992

Last Updated: 2025-05-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-02-01

Study Completion Date

2025-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Exoskeleton-assisted walking (EAW) provides a new mobility option and appears to have potential therapeutic benefits for persons with SCI. However, present day technology is not sufficient to replace the wheelchair. During EAW, users stand upright, maintain static and dynamic balance by actively and passively stimulating trunk and lower limb muscles in a manner not challenged during wheelchair use. Preliminary results in our laboratory suggest that the indirect balance challenges and postural perturbations that result during EAW training transfer to better seated balance control, resulting in more independence during seated activities. The purpose of this pilot study is to determine the effects of EAW training on various measures of seated balance (primary outcomes) and body composition (secondary outcomes). Twenty people with SCI (T4 and below) who are wheelchair users for mobility and cannot walk independently will be recruited. The participants will receive 36 sessions of EAW training in 12 weeks. The outcomes will be evaluated pre (baseline) and post (24 and 36 sessions). If EAW devices can be demonstrated to help people with SCI have better seated balance, in addition to the other potential benefits that are being investigated elsewhere, then exoskeletons may have the possibility to be more readily accepted in the clinical, home environments, and by the insurance companies.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Introduction/Background: People with spinal cord injury (SCI) can lose partial to complete voluntary control of arm, trunk and leg muscles, resulting in an inability to sit with stability, stand and/or walk. Because of poor trunk control during sitting, it may be challenging to reach for objects, dress or transfer independently, and the risk of a fall from their wheelchair is increased. Exoskeleton-assisted walking (EAW) provides upright, over ground mobility and has been demonstrated to be beneficial to improve patient-reported quality of life and some health-related outcomes. However, present day exoskeletons are not ready to replace the wheelchair. Our preliminary findings suggest that while walking in an exoskeleton, people with SCI are challenged to maintain upright balance by using their trunk muscles in a way that is rarely done from a wheelchair. Stimulation of the trunk muscles from upright postural challenges during EAW appears to benefit overall seated trunk control.

Summary of Goals and Objectives: The purpose of this study is to determine whether EAW can improve the primary outcomes of: seated balance, seated activities of daily living, and trunk muscle use. Additional secondary outcomes for body composition will be studied. Twenty people with SCI (T4 and below) who are wheelchair users will be recruited to participate.

Impact: The investigators believe that EAW training will significantly improve seated balance to improve wheelchair safety, stability and quality of life, thus, empowering people with SCI who use a wheelchair to live more independently. If EAW is demonstrated to have a significant benefit on seated balance, then use of these devices in the clinical and home environments may be further justified.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Spinal Cord Injuries

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Exoskeleton Users

All participants will receive 36 sessions of supervised EAW training using Indego™ for 12 weeks (3 to 4 sessions per week, 4-6 hours per week). The goal is to complete all 36 sessions in 12 weeks, but allowing for a two-week carryover to accommodate schedule conflicts or missed sessions.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Indego™ Exoskeleton

Intervention Type DEVICE

The Indego® is a powered exoskeleton that can be used as a mode of therapy in an institutional setting. Proper walking in this device requires the user to manipulate their center of gravity and balance by postural trunk excursions in order for the legs to take steps.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Indego™ Exoskeleton

The Indego® is a powered exoskeleton that can be used as a mode of therapy in an institutional setting. Proper walking in this device requires the user to manipulate their center of gravity and balance by postural trunk excursions in order for the legs to take steps.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Traumatic or non-traumatic SCI ≥6 months duration of SCI;
2. Wheelchair-user for indoor and outdoor mobility;
3. Level and completeness of injury T4 and below with complete or incomplete SCI (ISNCSCI A to D);
4. Able to hold the crutches in hands with or without modifications; and
5. Able to provide informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Diagnosis of neurological injury other than SCI;
2. Progressive condition that would be expected to result in changing neurological status;
3. Severe concurrent medical disease, illness or condition judged to be contraindicated by the Site Physician;
4. Anthropocentric incompatibility to be fitted with the device;
5. Traumatic or high impact lower extremity fracture within the past 2 years;
6. Fragility, minimal trauma or low impact fracture of the lower extremity since spinal cord injury;
7. Knee BMD \< 0.60 gm/cm2;
8. Total hip BMD T-scores \< -3.5;
9. Untreatable severe spasticity judged to be contraindicated by the Site Physician;
10. Flexion contracture that is incompatible with the device;
11. Limitations in ankle range of motion that cannot be adapted with an orthotic device (plantar flexion \> 00);
12. Fracture of the foot by x-ray and confirmed by CT;
13. Untreated or uncontrolled hypertension (systolic blood pressure \>140 mmHg; diastolic blood pressure \>90 mmHg);
14. Unresolved orthostatic hypotension (systolic blood pressure \<90 mmHg; diastolic blood pressure \<60 mmHg) as judged to be contraindicated by the Site Physician;
15. Current pressure ulcer of the arms, trunk, pelvic area, or lower extremities;
16. History of seizure;
17. Use of medications that significantly lower seizure threshold, such as tricyclic antidepressants, amphetamines, neuroleptics, dalfampridine, and bupropion;
18. History of stroke, brain tumor, brain abscess, or multiple sclerosis;
19. History of moderate or severe head trauma (loss of consciousness for greater than one hour or evidence of brain contusion or hemorrhage or depressed skull fracture on prior imaging);
20. History of implanted brain/spine/nerve simulators, aneurysm clips, ferromagnetic metallic implants, or cardiac pacemaker/defibrillator;
21. Psychopathology documentation in the medical record or history that may conflict with study objectives; and/or
22. Pregnancy or women who plan to become pregnant during the study period.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center

FED

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ann M. Spungen, EdD

Associate Director, VA RR&D National Center for the Medical Consequences of Spinal Cord Injury

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

James J. Peters VA Medical Center

The Bronx, New York, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Steven Knezevic, MS

Role: primary

718-584-9000 ext. 3130

Pierre K Asselin, MS

Role: backup

718-584-9000 ext. 3124

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SPU-17-029

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Neuromodulation Techniques After SCI
NCT04241250 COMPLETED PHASE2