Assessment of a Robotic Exoskeleton for Upper Limb Rehabilitation

NCT ID: NCT05615766

Last Updated: 2025-09-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

9 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-09-01

Study Completion Date

2026-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Rehabilitation robotics has the potential to facilitate rehabilitation at home and empower people with spinal injuries to self-manage increasing their independence and improving their quality of life.

The objective of this study is to assess for the first time in the NHS the efficacy of a commercial robotic orthosis for upper limb rehabilitation in patients with spinal cord injury. The device is produced by Myomo (myomo.com) which is an American company. We will be assessing the wearable robotic orthosis also known as robotic exoskeleton in two different neuro-rehabilitation centres: National Spinal injuries Unit in Glasgow (Scotland) and The Robert Jones and Agnus Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital in Oswestry (England). The study will involve nine spinal cord injured tetraplegic inpatients in total.

Patients will follow a twelve-week rehabilitation programme with three to four sessions per week in addition to their usual care and rehabilitation. Each session lasts for approximately 45 minutes. Participants arm function, range of motion, spasticity level will be measured before, half-way and at the end of the programme to assess change in these and other parameters. Training will focus on the dominant arm of the patient and compared to the other arm at every assessment stage.

We shall evaluate therapists' and patients' satisfaction with the commercial device in addition to assessing various clinical measures to evaluate the efficacy of using the robotic orthosis in rehabilitation and recovery of arm function.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Spinal Cord Injuries

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

DEVICE_FEASIBILITY

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Device Intervention

The intervention group who will be undergoing rehabilitation using the robotic exoskeleton in addition to the assigned traditional rehabilitation programme on their dominant arm only.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Experimental: Device Intervention

Intervention Type DEVICE

The robotic rehabilitation programme using the MARK from Myomo (myomo.com) for the intervention group will last for 12 weeks with up to four sessions of rehabilitation per week, i.e. total of 48 sessions. Spinal cord injured inpatients in the study will have this intervention on their dominant arm in addition to the traditional rehabilitation programme assigned and standard care.

Control

the matched control group will be the same subjects undergoing traditional rehabilitation only on their non-dominant arm.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Experimental: Device Intervention

The robotic rehabilitation programme using the MARK from Myomo (myomo.com) for the intervention group will last for 12 weeks with up to four sessions of rehabilitation per week, i.e. total of 48 sessions. Spinal cord injured inpatients in the study will have this intervention on their dominant arm in addition to the traditional rehabilitation programme assigned and standard care.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Robotic Rehabilitation

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age 18+ years.
* The levels of C5 C6 Asia C/D would provide individuals with elbow and hand impairment and potentially functional shoulder movements. C7, C8 individuals could also benefit from the hand component of the device.
* Some gross shoulder movement at start of the trial to enable changes at the elbow/hand, to have the greatest potential for functional change.
* Preservation of hand sensation as base for motor restoration.
* Some sitting balance would give the best opportunity for the arm to be released for functional upper limb activity.
* EMG (muscle activity) evidence of active finger flexion, extension and elbow flexion extension Grade 1-2.
* Minimal or No community functional use of upper limb at start of trial.
* Spasticity MAS 1-3/5.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic and District NHS Trust

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

The Queen Elizabeth National Spinal Injuries Unit, Scotland

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Stoke Mandeville Spinal Research

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Liverpool

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Heba Lakany, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Liverpool

Simon J Pickard

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital (Stanmore)

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status RECRUITING

The Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

Oswestry, , United Kingdom

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Heba Lakany, PhD

Role: CONTACT

+447737353181

Karen Wilding

Role: CONTACT

+447717 863747

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Emma Linley

Role: primary

020 3947 0100

Simon Pickard

Role: primary

01691 404000

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRAS312522

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

tSCS + EksoGT in SCI Patients
NCT05921175 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA